Starve a LIBERAL instead of Terry Schiavo

Starve a Liberal for a better America

Published on March 20, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics

In the spirit of fair play I have decided that any LIBERAL that thinks it is ok to starve Terry Schiavo to death should have to take her place.

Since the liberals say they are in touch with the common man they should have no problem starving themselves to death for the betterment of man.

This simple plan will eliminate much of the “waste” of oxygen and precious resources.

So be a better person, Liberals, a few here,need to starve yourselves to death for a real progressive movement.

Starve a Liberal for a better America.com My newest sight.

So all you fathead liberals do america A FAVOR... starve slowly to death, then tell me how starving terry schiavo is better for her because she can't feel it. JERKS!

Comments (Page 17)

241

bakerstreet

on Mar 25, 2005

They showed film of her tracking with a balloon again yesterday, watching it as it went left and right in front of her face. To me, that's nothing remotely like "brain dead". I understand that you don't consider that to be a state you would want to be in. I respect that, and you won't catch me ever saying you should be forced to live in it.

To me, though, that isn't the issue in this case. To me, this is a case of the judicial system ignoring gaping holes in the law.

All this "liquid brain" stuff isn't coming from in-depth testing. Michal Schiavo has adamantly refused for any MRI or other imaging to be done on this woman in years. He has no tangible evidence of his wife's wishes. He has behaved in a way that speaks of far more incentive on HIS part for her to die. DIRE behavior has been quoted by Gid that was offered by witnesses in court.

Time after time, court after court, they REFUSE to even consider her condition, making all these appeals about legal procedure. Time after time they refuse to even REQUEST to look into the current condition of T.S. People have the wrong impression and believe each of these appeals is about her state. They aren't.

So, still, they let this guy with every reason to want her out of the way to decide, when the family would happily "let him go", and care for her themselves. Still, they refuse even a 5 minute MRI. This is the guy that on a previous occasion REFUSED TO ALLOW HER CATHOLIC LAST RIGHTS AS SHE LAY STARVING.

In a vaccuum, I think you'd be right, Rightwinger, but this isn't a vacuum. You seem to think that I am disagreeing with you about when "life ends". That's your call. I don't think they even have good data on T.S., and if they did, they don't know her wishes.

242

drmiler

on Mar 25, 2005

Starving children in third world countries, including USA, and those who are in the final episode of life, due to illness and/or injury, are not equatable. I would never advocate starving healthy people.

So from what your say is that you "could" advocate it for someone who is *not* healthy?

243

Moderateman

on Mar 25, 2005

248 by BakerStreet
Friday, March 25, 2005

So, still, they let this guy with every reason to want her out of the way to decide, when the family would happily "let him go", and care for her themselves. Still, they refuse even a 5 minute MRI. This is the guy that on a previous occasion REFUSED TO ALLOW HER CATHOLIC LAST RIGHTS AS SHE LAY STARVING.

But this makes LIBERALS happy because they are GODLESS, and anti-religion. sickens me.

244

Moderateman

on Mar 25, 2005

222 by Enigmatic Jester
Thursday, March 24, 2005

Perhaps she is better off dead, but that's not the point. The point is: "What would she want?" If we knew that she'd still want to live, then anybody who'd support still euthanizing her is a murderer.

agreed,!

245

Moderateman

on Mar 25, 2005

249 by little_whip
Friday, March 25, 2005

daby-baby.....

~throws hands up in disgust~

Never mind.

never surrender, to the dark side whip... fight the good fight for all mankind.

STARVE A LIBERAL FOR A BETTER AMERICA!

246

Moderateman

on Mar 25, 2005

#250 by drmiler
Friday, March 25, 2005

Starving children in third world countries, including USA, and those who are in the final episode of life, due to illness and/or injury, are not equatable. I would never advocate starving healthy people.

So from what your say is that you "could" advocate it for someone who is *not* healthy?

I am sure if dabe had her way because of my illness {hep C}
she would have no problem murdering me, because I fall in the unhealthy catagory.

247

Moderateman

on Mar 25, 2005

254 by little_whip
Friday, March 25, 2005

Suffice it to say, it was his wish, and he died peacefully after a long and protracted illness

Brain damage is not an illness, dabey-baby, it's an INJURY. Her condition was not worsening, nor did it require anything to treat other than what we all need, food, water, and shelter.

Whatever, anyone who can use this argument to bitch about everything from tax cuts, the minimum wage, and HDTVs to the privatization of prisons and school shootings obviously has a screw loose.

Mind you, I'm not even trying to argue with you dabe...you're far too gone for that. How would you like to be my poster child for the Futility of Arguing with the Ignorant?

And MM...please tell me this business about her having 11 kids is something you've made up. The idea of her multiplying is shiveringly repugnant.

ah yes , Liberals use anything that happens to cry about anything else, it's kind of like a dam breaking.. they just cannot miss an oppertunity to whine, cry, piss and moan, demean someone, trash someone else. and on and on.

Wish I could tell you for sure she doesn't have 11 kids, but as things are now I just cannot say for a certainty she doesn't Its not the 11 kids that bother me at all, its the 11 different fathers.

248

drmiler

on Mar 25, 2005

#250 by drmiler
Friday, March 25, 2005

Starving children in third world countries, including USA, and those who are in the final episode of life, due to illness and/or injury, are not equatable. I would never advocate starving healthy people.

So from what your say is that you "could" advocate it for someone who is *not* healthy?

I am sure if dabe had her way because of my illness {hep C}
she would have no problem murdering me, because I fall in the unhealthy catagory.

Or me since I have MS.

249

joeKnowledge

on Mar 25, 2005

.... has anyone heard that there were witnesses to Terri saying that she would rather die? I just read that a few minutes ago.

???

250

joeKnowledge

on Mar 25, 2005

Link

here is the link... I know its a blog but I want to know if anyone here knows of this? witnesses that Terri said she did not want to live like that?

251

Moderateman

on Mar 25, 2005

#257 by drmiler
Friday, March 25, 2005

so does my best friend in REAL life, she blogs here as gimpyone, she is a treasure to me from GOD doc, I pray for your illness to leave! Get out! go away!

252

Moderateman

on Mar 25, 2005

259 by joeKnowledge
Friday, March 25, 2005

here is the link... I know its a blog but I want to know if anyone here knows of this? witnesses that Terri said she did not want to live like that?

I have not heard or read anything about that. I have no problem with letting her "go" just the kind, painless method
of STARVEATION,{SIC}

253

bakerstreet

on Mar 25, 2005

" .... has anyone heard that there were witnesses to Terri saying that she would rather die? I just read that a few minutes ago."

Anna Nicole Smith's husband expressed that he wanted her to have the share of his money she was seeking. That wasn't enough for the courts.

How much less important should this kind of hearsay be when someone's life is on the line? Do we really want a legal environment where a "husband" can get a couple of people to nod and have his wife killed? You'll have people "put out of their misery" left and right...

254

Dr Guy

on Mar 25, 2005

Better than your response Doc.

Dabe, that means you support starving children in third world countries since they are not healthy, and the quality of their life is going to be very bad?

Is this a liberal position?

255

Rightwinger

on Mar 25, 2005

I realize that her husband is a shit who pretty much took himself out of the picture years ago.
Yet, I keep seeing this stuff about him refusing money. If he stood to gain something, then I could understand why he wants her dead and stays involved. If he's not getting any money or anything out of it, then why is he even concerning himself with it? They say he "moved on". It doesn't look like it to me. Why is he still around?
Sadism? Masochism, maybe? What are HIS motives for even peripherally staying involved when he's so clearly not even in this woman's orbit anymore?

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!