America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
Starve a Liberal for a better America
Published on March 20, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics
In the spirit of fair play I have decided that any LIBERAL that thinks it is ok to starve Terry Schiavo to death should have to take her place.

Since the liberals say they are in touch with the common man they should have no problem starving themselves to death for the betterment of man.

This simple plan will eliminate much of the “waste” of oxygen and precious resources.

So be a better person, Liberals, a few here,need to starve yourselves to death for a real progressive movement.

Starve a Liberal for a better America.com My newest sight.

So all you fathead liberals do america A FAVOR... starve slowly to death, then tell me how starving terry schiavo is better for her because she can't feel it. JERKS!

Comments (Page 19)
21 PagesFirst 17 18 19 20 21 
on Mar 26, 2005
Reply By: ProgressiveUSAPosted: Saturday, March 26, 2005In reply #236, im-moder-rant seethed:ironic how the LIBERAL MIND WORKS ISN'T IT? blind to everything that they disagree with, so sure THEY know whats best for everyone. Um, it's the big government GOP trying to disrupt, usurp & dictate private family decisions here, dude. End-of-life decisions belong to next of kin, not grandstanding politicians. Real conservatives understand that. Tell us again how many liberals you want to starve, when in fact the position you oppose -- keeping BIG GOVT OUT of PRIVATE DECISIONS -- is a CONSERVATIVE point of view. And no amount of your hate-filled hypocrisy will change that fact.Ready to apologize yet?


all I see when you type with such hate filled venom is.. WAH WAH, BLAH Bleet baa whine waaa cryy piss, moan blah blah wah wah doot doot.

I have nothing to apoligize for. period.

STARVE A LIBERAL FOR A BETTER AMERICA!!
on Mar 26, 2005
Reply By: riazlongi(Anonymous User)Posted: Saturday, March 26, 2005Some judicial system which turns a deaf ear to emergencies. It seems black laws are more importance to them than life.Its judicial killing.


agreed. totally. This judicial crap happening can be directly linked to LIBERALS and the twisted liberal point of view.
on Mar 26, 2005
In a blog of greatness and truth RETROGRESSIVE ussr writes blather, hate filled ad hominim attacks filled with hyperbole, fed my unreasoning hatred of the truth.


you should apoligize to everyone that posted here.
on Mar 26, 2005


No, If any liberal wants to take Terri's place, We'll let them go right ahead. There is a lot of doubt wether she said that she wanted to die if ever on life support. She wasn't on life support anyway, there is also testimony that when an lawyer for her parents went to talk to her, she told terri to end this all you would have to say is "I want to live" and that Terri tried to say it. over 30 doctors have sworn afidavits stating that she was not in a PSV, and some nurses have sworn statements that she communicated with them. Judge Greer ignored this evidence and sided with Michael Schiavo.
on Mar 26, 2005
In Reply #224 by im-moder-rant spluttered:

yeh right, you come in MY BLOG insult me, call me names, twist the facts, put words in my mouth {or fingers} and you want me to apoligize??


That's right: You should apologize for your own hypocritical & hate-filled words.

No fact twisting or word putting involved. I'll quote just one example...

In the first post of this thread, im-moder-rant spewed:

all you fathead liberals do america A FAVOR... starve slowly to death


Two wrongs don't make a right. You yourself said starvation is cruel & wrong. And yet you advocate it for millions of Americans.

So which is it? Apologize or admit that you are a hate-filled hypocrite?


I think you should be the one to apologize for being a mindless liberal.
on Mar 26, 2005
well then I would add that the 3 branches of goverment is what it is all about.

For the most part judges take the law as it is and states. There are examples of overturning that. Maybe some Jim Crow laws for example.

It does happen, but for the most part it is left alone.

This is a balance in action, I guess. A few days ago, whether extreme or not, the presidentail and congressional branches came together to try to change the law.

In Terri's case it is over, but that does not mean others have to be like it.


It is still a very big issue. What constitutes marriage? What makes someone dead? Him movig on at the speed it did might not make sense but it is not for us to judge that, the real question is can he truely be in her best interests if he hasn't shown any dedication to her for at least a limited amount of time. Did he just give up after one doctor said she is gone or did he try to see if she would come back?


I think to avoid situations like this, there has to be a level of consern on the partners side. You can't make him staybut since it is a marriage I would suspect a 5 to 6 month wait (if parent dispute claims of will) before he is with someone else.



Very touchy subject.
on Mar 26, 2005
Reply By: CR Patriots BlogPosted: Saturday, March 26, 2005No, If any liberal wants to take Terri's place, We'll let them go right ahead. There is a lot of doubt wether she said that she wanted to die if ever on life support. She wasn't on life support anyway, there is also testimony that when an lawyer for her parents went to talk to her, she told terri to end this all you would have to say is "I want to live" and that Terri tried to say it. over 30 doctors have sworn afidavits stating that she was not in a PSV, and some nurses have sworn statements that she communicated with them. Judge Greer ignored this evidence and sided with Michael Schiavo.


yes greer did, he totally discounted anything anyone had to say that supported terry and took as gospell anything the shithead hubby presented.
on Mar 27, 2005
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Saturday, March 26, 2005


think you should be the one to apologize for being a mindless liberal


the key word doc is "mindless" how can the apoligize or discuss rationally when they have no mind at all?
on Mar 27, 2005
Reply By: joeKnowledgePosted: Saturday, March 26, 2005well then I would add that the 3 branches of goverment is what it is all about.For the most part judges take the law as it is and states. There are examples of overturning that. Maybe some Jim Crow laws for example.


I agree with the "for the most " part, but all to often these days we have LIBERAL activist judges making new "interpataion" of excisting laws as they make decisions about life and death, gay marriage and life in general.
on Mar 27, 2005
They showed film of her tracking with a balloon again yesterday, watching it as it went left and right in front of her face. To me, that's nothing remotely like "brain dead".


That entire video is 40 minutes long. Why was only about that same 15 seconds chosen to air? Because it's the part that apparantely shows Terri watching the balloon? Maybe her mother made the balloon follow Terri's head.
there is also testimony that when an lawyer for her parents went to talk to her, she told terri to end this all you would have to say is "I want to live" and that Terri tried to say it.


Yeah, the priest who speaks for the Schindlers says that too. Terri didn't even get out 2 words of what was probably going to be a 4 word sentence. Why do some people think they know what the last word was going to be? MAYBE TERRI TRIED TO SAY "I WANT TO DIE." CONVOLUTED CONSERVATIVE CRACKPOTS!! There are a lot of things she could have been trying to say. Gee, I wonder why they would spin it and say that Terri intended for the last word to be "live"? Or maybe they're just too fucking stupid to think so clearly.
on Mar 27, 2005
They showed film of her tracking with a balloon again yesterday, watching it as it went left and right in front of her face. To me, that's nothing remotely like "brain dead".


That entire video is 40 minutes long. Why was only about that same 15 seconds chosen to air? Because it's the part that apparantely shows Terri watching the balloon? Maybe her mother made the balloon follow Terri's head. there is also testimony that when an lawyer for her parents went to talk to her, she told terri to end this all you would have to say is "I want to live" and that Terri tried to say it.


Yeah, the priest who speaks for the Schindlers says that too. Terri didn't even get out 2 words of what was probably going to be a 4 word sentence. Why do some people think they know what the last word was going to be? MAYBE TERRI TRIED TO SAY "I WANT TO DIE." CONVOLUTED CONSERVATIVE CRACKPOTS!! There are a lot of things she could have been trying to say. Gee, I wonder why they would spin it and say that Terri intended for the last word to be "live"? Or maybe they're just too fucking stupid to think so clearly.


Or maybe ya'll are to ignorant to hear the truth? What the actual truth is we'll never know, now will we? IGNORANT LEFTIST LOBOTOMIZED LIBERAL!
on Mar 27, 2005
Try to deflect the point. The point is, "die" might have been what she wanted to say. For some reason, some people are ignoring that fact. You included yourself in that "we", didn't you? Then why are you here? Pontificating.
on Mar 27, 2005
Try to deflect the point. The point is, "die" might have been what she wanted to say. For some reason, some people are ignoring that fact. You included yourself in that "we", didn't you? Then why are you here? Pontificating.


Better question would be why *any* of us are here?
on Mar 27, 2005
Reply By: Iconoclast™Posted: Sunday, March 27, 2005


MAYBE TERRI TRIED TO SAY "I WANT TO DIE." CONVOLUTED CONSERVATIVE CRACKPOTS!!


yeh yeh yeh and maybe she said I want to fly.. or I want to cry, because your killing me. the truth is no one know shit.. and the other truth is STARVATION is cruel.
on Mar 27, 2005
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Sunday, March 27, 2005


Or maybe ya'll are to ignorant to hear the truth? What the actual truth is we'll never know, now will we? IGNORANT LEFTIST LOBOTOMIZED LIBERAL!


is not it funny how the "truth to liberals" comes from an assumption that thye somehow know what terry might or might not think?
21 PagesFirst 17 18 19 20 21