Starve a LIBERAL instead of Terry Schiavo

Starve a Liberal for a better America

Published on March 20, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics

In the spirit of fair play I have decided that any LIBERAL that thinks it is ok to starve Terry Schiavo to death should have to take her place.

Since the liberals say they are in touch with the common man they should have no problem starving themselves to death for the betterment of man.

This simple plan will eliminate much of the “waste” of oxygen and precious resources.

So be a better person, Liberals, a few here,need to starve yourselves to death for a real progressive movement.

Starve a Liberal for a better America.com My newest sight.

So all you fathead liberals do america A FAVOR... starve slowly to death, then tell me how starving terry schiavo is better for her because she can't feel it. JERKS!

Comments (Page 1)

TheFazz

on Mar 20, 2005

Starving Terry Schiavo and starving a liberal are two different things. Liberals are fully-functioning humans capable of thought (for the most part). Mrs. Schiavo is entirely incapacitated with no chance of recovery. It's not as though she is able to live in the way humans normally do.

Ionolast

on Mar 20, 2005

Did she not say at one time that she doesn't want to live in a vegetative state? (Or something like that). (California notwithstanding). Why do her parents think they have the right to go against her wishes? Was she an adult when she said that? For someone who calls liberals fatheaded and feels the need to "use as many one syllable words as I can so they don't get confused", your spelling sucks. There used to be knee-jerk liberals, now there are knee-jerk conservatives.

philomedy

on Mar 20, 2005

Even if a liberal wanted to starve him or herself, wouldn't conservatives be morally obligated, with their whole life-must-be-preserved-at-all-costs thing, to decide what is best for said liberal, and prevent him or her from dying?

Ionolast

on Mar 20, 2005

Good one, Philomedy.

philomedy

on Mar 20, 2005

Good one, Philomedy. Do you get the feeling that moderateman is trying to rack up JU points?

If it was anyone else, maybe, but I think I know him well enough to say no to that one. I think his motivations for writing controversial things are the same as mine...we just disagree on the points that we make.

Moderateman

on Mar 20, 2005

Reply By: TheFazzPosted: Sunday, March 20, 2005Starving Terry Schiavo and starving a liberal are two different things. Liberals are fully-functioning humans capable of thought (for the most part). Mrs. Schiavo is entirely incapacitated with no chance of recovery. It's not as though she is able to live in the way humans normally do

so you decide who lives and who dies? why can't I? I would rather see terry alive and ted, hanoijohn, pelsoi dead than her.

Moderateman

on Mar 20, 2005

Reply By: Iconoclast™Posted: Sunday, March 20, 2005Did she not say at one time that she doesn't want to live in a vegetative state? (Or something like that). (California notwithstanding). Why do her parents think they have the right to go against her wishes? Was she an adult when she said that? For someone who calls liberals fatheaded and feels the need to "use as many one syllable words as I can so they don't get confused", your spelling sucks. There used to be knee-jerk liberals, now there are knee-jerk conservatives.

jerk this! and we ONLY have the word of a cheating husband {2 months after terry was fracked he was fuckin someone else} that terry told him she wanted to die if.. blah blah happened.

Moderateman

on Mar 20, 2005

Reply By: PhilomedyPosted: Sunday, March 20, 2005Even if a liberal wanted to starve him or herself, wouldn't conservatives be morally obligated, with their whole life-must-be-preserved-at-all-costs thing, to decide what is best for said liberal, and prevent him or her from dying?

I could make a clear concious exception...

Moderateman

on Mar 20, 2005

Reply By: Iconoclast™Posted: Sunday, March 20, 2005Good one, Philo

I will decide whats a good one here not you child.

Moderateman

on Mar 20, 2005

Reply By: PhilomedyPosted: Sunday, March 20, 2005Good one, Philomedy. Do you get the feeling that moderateman is trying to rack up JU points?If it was anyone else, maybe, but I think I know him well enough to say no to that one. I think his motivations for writing controversial things are the same as mine...we just disagree on the points that we make.

I see the child censored its self... took out some carp.. smart move hicolinicblast.

Moderateman

on Mar 20, 2005

thanx philo we do disagree alot but I RESPECT you.

philomedy

on Mar 20, 2005

I could make a clear concious exception...

Really...so...disagree with moderateman...he can kill you with a clear conscience...interesting...

philomedy

on Mar 20, 2005

thanx philo we do disagree alot but I RESPECT you.

Feeling is mutual as always.

Moderateman

on Mar 20, 2005

Reply By: PhilomedyPosted: Sunday, March 20, 2005I could make a clear concious exception...Really...so...disagree with moderateman...he can kill you with a clear conscience...interesting...

I could'nt kill anyone but if a liberal decided starving themselves to death was the way to go, I would'nt stop them. do NOT MAKE ME A KILLER PLEASE.

philomedy

on Mar 20, 2005

I could'nt kill anyone but if a liberal decided starving themselves to death was the way to go, I would'nt stop them. do NOT MAKE ME A KILLER PLEASE

I wouldnt dream of it...your original response just needed a little clarification, which you provided, as I had no doubt that you would.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!