America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
Starve a Liberal for a better America
Published on March 20, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics
In the spirit of fair play I have decided that any LIBERAL that thinks it is ok to starve Terry Schiavo to death should have to take her place.

Since the liberals say they are in touch with the common man they should have no problem starving themselves to death for the betterment of man.

This simple plan will eliminate much of the “waste” of oxygen and precious resources.

So be a better person, Liberals, a few here,need to starve yourselves to death for a real progressive movement.

Starve a Liberal for a better America.com My newest sight.

So all you fathead liberals do america A FAVOR... starve slowly to death, then tell me how starving terry schiavo is better for her because she can't feel it. JERKS!

Comments (Page 2)
21 Pages1 2 3 4  Last
on Mar 20, 2005
Reply By: PhilomedyPosted: Sunday, March 20, 2005I could'nt kill anyone but if a liberal decided starving themselves to death was the way to go, I would'nt stop them. do NOT MAKE ME A KILLER PLEASEI wouldnt dream of it...your original response just needed a little clarification, which you provided, as I had no doubt that you would.


K, clear.
on Mar 20, 2005
Reply By: Iconoclast™Posted: Sunday, March 20, 2005


your spelling sucks. There used to be knee-jerk liberals, now there are knee-jerk conservatives.


ah yes the big point of fair mineded liberal jerks... your spelling sucks. wow I am crushed by your wit, your cutting humor, your Brilliant anoligies.

try this site. www.liberals blows BULLS.com I am sure you will feel at home there.
on Mar 20, 2005
Liberals are fully-functioning humans capable of thought (for the most part). Mrs. Schiavo is entirely incapacitated with no chance of recovery. It's not as though she is able to live in the way humans normally do.


This is BS!!! The speech therapist alone has stated that in as little as 6 months of therapy, Terri could be talking again. But her scumbag husband has refused therapy. Makes me wonder why that is.....?
It's not like he doesn't have the money now is it? Go do a little google research and learn the "whole" truth!
on Mar 20, 2005
Starve them hell, line em up against the wall at dawn!
on Mar 20, 2005
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Sunday, March 20, 2005Liberals are fully-functioning humans capable of thought (for the most part). Mrs. Schiavo is entirely incapacitated with no chance of recovery. It's not as though she is able to live in the way humans normally do.This is BS!!! The speech therapist alone has stated that in as little as 6 months of therapy, Terri could be talking again. But her scumbag husband has refused therapy. Makes me wonder why that is.....?It's not like he doesn't have the money now is it? Go do a little google research and learn the "whole" truth


truth???? since when did truth ever stop a far left idiot from spewing crap?
on Mar 20, 2005
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Sunday, March 20, 2005Starve them hell, line em up against the wall at dawn!


nope since the far left feels "it's ok for terry to starve to death" it is only fair a few of them starve to death too since for the most part they are brain dead just like terry.
on Mar 20, 2005
I think it's funny how, when someone writes a mildly inflammatory article that elicits a lot of passionate responses, the side that opposes what they write wants to accuse them of points-whoring.

I, for one, wouldn't want to be left "living" my "life" in the same mental state as Ms. Schiavo. That's just me, though.
Yes, her husband is a bag of flyblown shit whose trustworthiness is about as solid and water-tight as a fish net, but what else do they have, really? The whole thing seems to be hearsay; he-said-she-said stuff.
I admire her family for their loving, unselfish desire to care for Terri for the rest of her life, but I have to wonder if and when that would get old.
on Mar 20, 2005
Reply By: RightwingerPosted: Sunday, March 20, 2005I think it's funny how, when someone writes a mildly inflammatory article that elicits a lot of passionate responses, the side that opposes what they write wants to accuse them of points-whoring.I, for one, wouldn't want to be left "living" my "life" in the same mental state as Ms. Schiavo. That's just me, though. Yes, her husband is a bag of flyblown shit whose trustworthiness is about as solid and water-tight as a fish net, but what else do they have, really? The whole thing seems to be hearsay; he-said-she-said stuff.I admire her family for their loving, unselfish desire to care for Terri for the rest of her life, but I have to wonder if and when that would get old.


this is why advanced directives ARE THE ONLY WAY TO GO.. they spell out what YOU want done what and if the shit hits the fan.
on Mar 20, 2005
Someone who has lved with a new family for ten years and has kids with another woman shouldn't be considered her "husband". There was no wish set down legally, and the hearsay we have has only been verified by him, and only a long time after she fell into this state.

Its a bad precedent to set, but since Senate Republicans have "taken a side", those who hate them will have the knee-jerk opposite reaction.
on Mar 20, 2005
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Sunday, March 20, 2005Starve them hell, line em up against the wall at dawn!


nope since the far left feels "it's ok for terry to starve to death" it is only fair a few of them starve to death too since for the most part they are brain dead just like terry


Who said a few? I meant ALL of them! You can have your few..... line up the rest!
on Mar 21, 2005
this is why advanced directives ARE THE ONLY WAY TO GO.. they spell out what YOU want done what and if the shit hits the fan.


I agree....or, barring that, sit down with your entire family and let them all know in no uncertain terms how you want it. Also, whether or not you want to be a donor, as I have.
on Mar 21, 2005
There should be nothing wrong with this. After all, if somebody consents to killing somebody else, as long as they're close, it will be as if that person who is being killed consented. That's how euthanasia, aka assisted suicide, works in the Netherlands, and the liberals love it!
on Mar 21, 2005
as long as they're close


So, if I get my brother, cousin or best friend to blow my brains out, it's okay. But if I talk somebody from off the street into doing it, it's murder? That's insane.
on Mar 21, 2005
this is too much. I don;t know the facts about this, but a congresional hearing? It just seems funny when there are other things to have congresional hearings about... like american security, labor laws, social security...

I do admit this sounds really fishy. I would think that is she knew how much her family wanted her alive, even if she really couldn't be cognitive for it, she might have said yes.
on Mar 21, 2005
I'll admit though, the title of this kinda makes it funny... save this person because of right to life... but kill this one because blah blah so its ok.

I still say right to life people don't sem to get that life without living is worthless. Just being alive is not enough. People in slave ships throw their babies into the ocean for that reason.

Kill a crimanal? Have a war? Have a gun?
21 Pages1 2 3 4  Last