America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
Starve a Liberal for a better America
Published on March 20, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics
In the spirit of fair play I have decided that any LIBERAL that thinks it is ok to starve Terry Schiavo to death should have to take her place.

Since the liberals say they are in touch with the common man they should have no problem starving themselves to death for the betterment of man.

This simple plan will eliminate much of the “waste” of oxygen and precious resources.

So be a better person, Liberals, a few here,need to starve yourselves to death for a real progressive movement.

Starve a Liberal for a better America.com My newest sight.

So all you fathead liberals do america A FAVOR... starve slowly to death, then tell me how starving terry schiavo is better for her because she can't feel it. JERKS!

Comments (Page 4)
21 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 6  Last
on Mar 21, 2005
Reply By: Iconoclast™Posted: Monday, March 21, 2005


You sure are an angry asshole. Go get laid.


you offering? if yer male the answere is no, if female the answere is still no. married here and get all I want or need. angry? well that is on the money, asshole? thats true too, now will you own up to being a petulant child? and angry too?
on Mar 21, 2005
no painkillers will be administered


On CNN this morning, Dr. Sanjay Gupta said they would give her painkillers.

All the doctors who examined her in person, not just on videotape, said she has no chance of recovery. I think she should die in peace with what dignity she has left.

The only reason many people think life is sacred is that they're alive. It's just self-interest. Dead people don't give a damn.

If it was anyone else, maybe, but I think I know him well enough to say no to that one. I think his motivations for writing controversial things are the same as mine...we just disagree on the points that we make.


I disageee with you, Philomedy. His articles and posts are more than just confrontational; they're inflammatory.

on Mar 21, 2005
The server messed up.
on Mar 21, 2005
Reply By: Iconoclast™Posted: Monday, March 21, 2005no painkillers will be administeredOn CNN this morning, Dr. Sanjay Gupta said they would give her painkillers.All the doctors who examined her in person, not just on videotape, said she has no chance of recovery. I think she should die in peace with what dignity she has left.If it was anyone else, maybe, but I think I know him well enough to say no to that one. I think his motivations for writing controversial things are the same as mine...we just disagree on the points that we make.I disageee with you, Philomedy. His articles and posts are more than just confrontational; they're inflammatory.The only reason many people think that life is sacred is that they're alive. It's just self-interest. Dead people don't give a damn.


if you find my stuff so hurtfull and inflamitory why read them? comment on them? hm??
on Mar 21, 2005
Reply By: Iconoclast™Posted: Monday, March 21, 2005The server messed up.


I deleated 2 of your replies that were duplicates of the one I left. server problems abound.
on Mar 21, 2005
On CNN this morning, Dr. Sanjay Gupta said they would give her painkillers.


I'm glad for that, but the fact that they're giving her painkillers does underscore that this is a right to kill case, not a right to die case.

Congratulations, Mr. Schiavo. You've won a right that the Nazis couldn't establish at Nuremberg.
on Mar 21, 2005
Reply By: Gideon MacLeishPosted: Monday, March 21, 2005On CNN this morning, Dr. Sanjay Gupta said they would give her painkillers.I'm glad for that, but the fact that they're giving her painkillers does underscore that this is a right to kill case, not a right to die case.Congratulations, Mr. Schiavo. You've won a right that the Nazis couldn't establish at Nuremberg.


sigh.... if they would just over dose her I could let this go... it is the slow starvation that is driving me up a wall.
on Mar 21, 2005
I agree 100% with you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Terri DESERVES to live!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
on Mar 21, 2005

I think she should die in peace with what dignity she has left.

Starving to death is not dying with dignity.

on Mar 21, 2005
#54 by Dr. Guy
Monday, March 21, 2005


Starving to death is not dying with dignity.


and this is the crux of my anger. slow starvation is somehow ok because she is damaged goods?
on Mar 21, 2005
53 by Jester277 (Anonymous user)
Monday, March 21, 2005


agree 100% with you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Terri DESERVES to live!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


deserves??? I don't think so.
on Mar 21, 2005
now will you own up to being a petulant child? and angry too?


*Stomps foot* NO!
I never said I think she should be starved to death. I agree with Myrrander about the morphine.
on Mar 21, 2005
Reply By: Iconoclast™Posted: Monday, March 21, 2005now will you own up to being a petulant child? and angry too?*Stomps foot* NO! I never said I think she should be starved to death. I agree with Myrrander about the morphine.


stomps foot????/ ok now I like you, I just love silly people. truce?
on Mar 21, 2005
stomps foot????/ ok now I like you, I just love silly people. truce?


Yeah, because we all know how well they work. More like a temporary cease fire.
on Mar 21, 2005
I think she should die in peace with what dignity she has left.


There are a lot of people around the world I would prefer not to see around, but it doesn't give me the right to end their life. She isn't being "kept alive", she is being fed. The fact she is horribly handicapped seems to now give a spouse the right to kill.

"I never said I think she should be starved to death. I agree with Myrrander about the morphine."


No lefty around here had better ever spout off about the death penalty from here on. Killing a handicapped person isn't any different than killing a convicted murderer.

...Oh, wait, it is different. One is being punished for a crime, the other is being punished for a handicap...
21 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 6  Last