Starve a LIBERAL instead of Terry Schiavo

211

Moderateman

on Mar 24, 2005

There you go again spewing hate & hypocrisy.Bon appetit!!

can you possibly BELIEVE that I would starve anyone for real>>?? please....

212

Moderateman

on Mar 24, 2005

Reply By: ProgressiveUSAPosted: Thursday, March 24, 2005I cannot for the life of me understand your advocating the starvation of any person.Um, that's because I haven't advocated it -- you have. Over & over. Explicitly. In post after post.you have never needed a reason to spew hate and vile behavior,Keep working on that reading comprehension. You need it.Your points might be clearer or more reasonably stated if you set aside your irrational hatred for 'liberals'. Who knows, we might even agree on things.Please, for the good of blogosphere, try to get over your hate.

you really need to get a sense of humor... for GODS sake man you must think I am some kind of monster. well I am not, just pissy with the far elft, and could not cause harm to any man/woman intentionally.

213

Moderateman

on Mar 24, 2005

Reply By: ProgressiveUSAPosted: Thursday, March 24, 2005I cannot for the life of me understand your advocating the starvation of any person.Um, that's because I haven't advocated it -- you have. Over & over. Explicitly. In post after post.you have never needed a reason to spew hate and vile behavior,Keep working on that reading comprehension. You need it.Your points might be clearer or more reasonably stated if you set aside your irrational hatred for 'liberals'. Who knows, we might even agree on things.Please, for the good of blogosphere, try to get over your hate.

you really need to get a sense of humor... for GODS sake man you must think I am some kind of monster. well I am not, just pissy with the far left and could not cause harm to any man/woman intentionally.

214

messybuu

on Mar 24, 2005

What's funny is that liberals who support "euthanizing" don't do it because they think she'd want that. They support it 'cause she's brain dead and they'd rather die in her situation, just like I'd want to die if I was insane, morbidly obese, or chronically homeless, yet I don't get to choose for these people based on my own wants.

I do wonder if they'd support her right to live if an authentic document was found saying she wanted to live. I know I'd support her right to die if such a document requested it.

215

Moderateman

on Mar 24, 2005

220 by Enigmatic Jester
Thursday, March 24, 2005

What's funny is that liberals who support "euthanizing" don't do it because they think she'd want that. They support it 'cause she's brain dead and they'd rather die in her situation, just like I'd want to die if I was insane, morbidly obese, or chronically homeless, yet I don't get to choose for these people based on my own wants.
I do wonder if they'd support her right to live if an authentic document was found saying she wanted to live. I know I'd support her right to die if such a document requested it.

I think for the most part we all agree this poor woman is better off dead, it's just the "kind" method they are using.

How can any doctor say with a certainty "terry is not suffering" from death by starvation is beyond me.

216

messybuu

on Mar 24, 2005

I think for the most part we all agree this poor woman is better off dead, it's just the "kind" method they are using.

Perhaps she is better off dead, but that's not the point. The point is: "What would she want?" If we knew that she'd still want to live, then anybody who'd support still euthanizing her is a murderer.

217

ProgressiveUSA

on Mar 24, 2005

can you possibly BELIEVE that I would starve anyone for real>>?? please....

It's not about me. It's about you taking responsibility for your own statements.

Why not retract your statement then? You know, the one you made over & over again, where you EXPLICITLY state that STARVING millions of your fellow Americans would improve the country.

you really need to get a sense of humor... for GODS sake man you must think I am some kind of monster. well I am not, just pissy with the far left and could not cause harm to any man/woman intentionally.

It's not the just far left who said the Florida judge made the right decision:
- The polls (plural) showed that 60-70 percent said so too.
- So did the federal judge, the federal appeals court, & the SCOTUS (who stayed out of it).

By your 'logic' all of them 'want Terri to starve.' And those are the same people who you want to starve for their viewpoints. To improve America, you say. Over & over. Explicitly.

I think you all of us an apology & a retraction.

218

Moderateman

on Mar 24, 2005

Reply By: ProgressiveUSAPosted: Thursday, March 24, 2005can you possibly BELIEVE that I would starve anyone for real>>?? please....It's not about me. It's about you taking responsibility for your own statements. Why not retract your statement then? You know, the one you made over & over again, where you EXPLICITLY state that STARVING millions of your fellow Americans would improve the country.you really need to get a sense of humor... for GODS sake man you must think I am some kind of monster. well I am not, just pissy with the far left and could not cause harm to any man/woman intentionally.It's not the just far left who said the Florida judge made the right decision:- The polls (plural) showed that 60-70 percent said so too.- So did the federal judge, the federal appeals court, & the SCOTUS (who stayed out of it).By your 'logic' all of them 'want Terri to starve.' And those are the same people who you want to starve for their viewpoints. To improve America, you say. Over & over. Explicitly.I think you all of us an apology & a retraction.

yeh right, you come in MY BLOG insult me, call me names, twist the facts, put words in my mouth {or fingers} and you want me to apoligize?? MAN GIMMEE some dat shit yer smoking,it must be the bomb. cause truly you are not from planet earth.

in other words NO apology, no retraction, no how no way never. nyet, nine,nevah...because there is nothing for me to say sorry for, unlike the liberals here I freely admit when I am wrong, but I am not wrong in this matter. period. end of sentence. end of conversation.

219

NS38

on Mar 24, 2005

Our Government has many flaws...This with terry schiavo is one of them...I am not sure but I do not think that your should starve a helpless woman. It would be like tieing someone up and starving them. She cant help that she is in this condition but starving her is not the right anwser.

~Live Life to the Fullest~
Ns38

220

Moderateman

on Mar 24, 2005

Reply By: NS38Posted: Thursday, March 24, 2005Our Government has many flaws...This with terry schiavo is one of them...I am not sure but I do not think that your should starve a helpless woman. It would be like tieing someone up and starving them. She cant help that she is in this condition but starving her is not the right anwser.~Live Life to the Fullest~

My point exactly. thank you for being the voice of reason at the end of this post.

221

drmiler

on Mar 24, 2005

I don't believe that she should be let die period! Having said that if your going to let her go, starvation is NOT the way.

222

Moderateman

on Mar 24, 2005

Reply By: drmilerPosted: Thursday, March 24, 2005I don't believe that she should be let die period! Having said that if your going to let her go, starvation is NOT the way.

I agree one one point, she should not starve to death.. It is not up to me if she should die or not and it should not be left to the creep husband with an obvious agenda, Kill terry at any cost, as long as it does not cost him any money,, whatta buttmunch, and this man is what liberals hearald as right? bushwaaaaaa

223

bakerstreet

on Mar 25, 2005

mmm, polls. Like the ones that showed Bush as having a dismal approval rating and showed Kerry ahead in the election any number of times...

Funny how Bush-haters love polls THAT AGREE WITH THEM, and then dismisses the ones that don;t. Now, are we allowed to brush off polls as "innacurate and patently flawed" as we have been told time and time again...

224

messybuu

on Mar 25, 2005

mmm, polls. Like the ones that showed Bush as having a dismal approval rating and showed Kerry ahead in the election any number of times...

Funny how Bush-haters love polls THAT AGREE WITH THEM, and then dismisses the ones that don;t. Now, are we allowed to brush off polls as "innacurate and patently flawed" as we have been told time and time again...

Oh, and wasn't legislation banning gay marriage supported by a majority of the voters? At least in California, that proposition that bans gay marriage was passed by the people, and yet, in that case, you don't hear these people saying that since the majority supports it, it's right.

225

Dr Guy

on Mar 25, 2005

Wow Dr. Guy that’s a very liberal statement. What’s next advocating social programs and financial assistance for lesser among us?

No, it is a humanitarian statement. Are you arguing with it, or just surprised of the source?