America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
One issue ain't so damn important!
Published on September 13, 2005 By Moderateman In US Domestic
It seems no matter what else is happening in the world and America, hurricanes, disease, war, huge gas prices, the only thing that matters to the left is the abortion issue, or thinking of ways to Trash Bush.

Judge Roberts has incredible credentials, a brilliant mind a sense of how a REAL JUDGE should behave {no legislating from the bench} interpreting the law as written and adhering to precedent.

But the left with no real policies or solutions are hammering away on the abortion issue! Why is this damn thing so important to the loony left? I guess that's the only way the left can continue to get support from its base! I do mean base in both senses of the word BTW.

Main Entry: base
Part of Speech: adjective
Definition: vulgar
Synonyms: abject, abominable, cheap, coarse, common, contemptible, corrupt, depraved, despicable, disgraceful, dishonorable, disreputable, foul, grovelling, humble, ignoble, immoral, indelicate, loathsome, lowly, mean, menial, offensive, paltry, pitiful, plebeian, poor, scandalous, servile, shameful, shoddy, sleazy, sordid, sorry, squalid, trashy, ugly, unworthy, vile, worthless, wretched

The above pretty much defines the Democratic BASE.

Comments (Page 2)
8 Pages1 2 3 4  Last
on Sep 13, 2005
I think it is hypocritical that some think "a woman's right to choose what she does with her own body" is the same as "a woman's right to choose what to do with an unborn child." As if the child is universally accepted as being some vestigial organ until it pops out.

If you could convince me a fetus is no more than an unnecessary part of a woman's body, I might agree. There's no great "truth" that makes it so, though, and pretending we all agree on that is a blind spot to pro-abortion folks. They accept it as a given fact, when in reality, it is far more than just debatable.


Ditto.
on Sep 13, 2005
'right-to-life'


Oops...sorry..have to retract that one. It's us.
What I meant to say was that they're supposed to have all the concern for humanity. Sorry.
on Sep 13, 2005
I think it is hypocritical that some think "a woman's right to choose what she does with her own body" is the same as "a woman's right to choose what to do with an unborn child." As if the child is universally accepted as being some vestigial organ until it pops out.

If you could convince me a fetus is no more than an unnecessary part of a woman's body, I might agree. There's no great "truth" that makes it so, though, and pretending we all agree on that is a blind spot to pro-abortion folks. They accept it as a given fact, when in reality, it is far more than just debatable.


Bakerstreet--we are never going to agree on this issue. I was answering the question MM presented from my point of view. You did see the word "personally", right? To me, it is an extremely important issue because I believe it is about a woman's right to choose. I have yet to be convinced that the fetus has a soul.

As soon as I see you chastize the left the same way you chastize me I will stop.


I wasn't chastizing you, merely pointing out why a lot from the "other" side might not want to comment.
on Sep 13, 2005
16 by HC...
Tuesday, September 13, 2005


Ditto


I see your ditto and raise you 2 exactlies!
on Sep 13, 2005
I support a womans right to choose, I do not have to like it.
---Modman

I agree....besides, you 'choose' (barring rape, of course) to engage in the sex act, too. No matter what kind of protection is used, there's always the chance of failure.
As someone once said "if you're adult enough to make'em, you're adult enough to raise'em." Call that old-fashioned, but it's what I believe.

I think it is hypocritical that some think "a woman's right to choose what she does with her own body" is the same as "a woman's right to choose what to do with an unborn child." As if the child is universally accepted as being some vestigial organ until it pops out.

If you could convince me a fetus is no more than an unnecessary part of a woman's body, I might agree. There's no great "truth" that makes it so, though, and pretending we all agree on that is a blind spot to pro-abortion folks. They accept it as a given fact, when in reality, it is far more than just debatable.
---Baker

Well put.
on Sep 13, 2005
#17 by Rightwinger
Tuesday, September 13, 2005


Oops...sorry..have to retract that one. It's us.
What I meant to say was that they're supposed to have all the concern for humanity. Sorry.


yeh right! heh.
on Sep 13, 2005
20 by Rightwinger
Tuesday, September 13, 2005


support a womans right to choose, I do not have to like it.
---Modman

I agree....besides, you 'choose' (barring rape, of course) to engage in the sex act, too. No matter what kind of protection is used, there's always the chance of failure.
As someone once said "if you're adult enough to make'em, you're adult enough to raise'em." Call that old-fashioned, but it's what I believe.


while I agree in principle I still support a womans right to choose.
on Sep 13, 2005
wasn't chastizing you, merely pointing out why a lot from the "other" side might not want to comment.


ok shades, I appreciate the pointing out then.

But I never expect the other side to comment. they are afraid of the truth and cannot stand it in the light of day {most not all}

If they cannot figure out a way to blame bush they have no comment.
on Sep 13, 2005
ok shades, I appreciate the pointing out then.

But I never expect the other side to comment. they are afraid of the truth and cannot stand it in the light of day {most not all}

If they cannot figure out a way to blame bush they have no comment.


MM--I'm the other side--did you see me blame bush? Do I appear to be afraid of the truth?

But if you don't want "us" to comment, I'll bud out.
on Sep 13, 2005
It keeps coming down to abortion because like certain people on this site who shall remain nameless (colon gene). They are fast becoming "one trick ponies"!
on Sep 13, 2005
Personally, the right to choose what I do with my own body is central to my political affliations. It's not a method for grand-standing the political area, or throwing a wrench in an otherwise effective political structure--it is something that honestly effects me and my rights


Fine...leave MY tax dollars out of it, is all I ask!
on Sep 13, 2005
24 by shadesofgrey
Tuesday, September 13, 2005


MM--I'm the other side--did you see me blame bush? Do I appear to be afraid of the truth?


notice the "most not all" comment?

I appreciate your views btw.

elie

MM
on Sep 13, 2005
From listening, I'm starting to wonder whose hearing it is... Judge Roberts or the pedophile lover Justice Ruth Buzzie Ginsberg? Someone needs to smack Sen. Biden up side the head and remind him that Justice Ginsberg is not the U.S. Constitution.
on Sep 13, 2005
#25 by drmiler
Tuesday, September 13, 2005


#25 by drmiler
Tuesday, September 13, 2005


It keeps coming down to abortion because like certain people on this site who shall remain nameless (colon gene). They are fast becoming "one trick ponies"!


If you took away bush private gene would not have a thought in his vacuous head
on Sep 13, 2005
#26 by Gideon MacLeish
Tuesday, September 13, 2005


Personally, the right to choose what I do with my own body is central to my political affliations. It's not a method for grand-standing the political area, or throwing a wrench in an otherwise effective political structure--it is something that honestly effects me and my rights


Fine...leave MY tax dollars out of it, is all I ask!


nope not gonna happen, we will continue to pay for the misdeeds of careless women.
8 Pages1 2 3 4  Last