Racial profiling or Common sense?

1

shawnee89

on Dec 22, 2004

i agree 100%. racial profiling is common sense. i grantee it will stop the next attack from a plane.

2

mismos

on Dec 22, 2004

Fundamentalist American Reactionary Terrorists are to now be known as FARTs.

The first sign of the Armageddon!!! FARTs have multiplied and spread ignorance and fear over the US like the plague - and are they are now infiltrating the Internet, spreading stupidity and intolerance in an attempt to begin the greatest war ever!!! The rest of the world must racially profile all Americans to stop the spread of these narrow-minded FARTs all over the globe!!! For the good of America and the world - act now!!!

Go find a KKK party to spread this despicable hate propaganda! You guys are just asking for Nazi comparisons. There is no reasoning with people like you - you're just hate filled.

3

greywar

on Dec 22, 2004

i grantee it will stop the next attack from a plane.

I wouldn't go that far but it certainly stands a better chance of stopping it than searching his wife because her number came up and NOT searching Abu Jihad standing behind her because we are afraid of being politically incorrect. Al Qaeda certainly didn't worry about political correctness when it attacked the US.

4

foreverserenity

on Dec 22, 2004

And it doesn't matter if you're dress in jeans, shirt and slippers in order to avoid the harrasment - they search you anyway. It doesn't matter if you dont' fit the profile. I know it's for our safety, and I applaud that, but there are times when they go too far, while the person to be checked is sneaking behind them.

5

mismos

on Dec 22, 2004

If the government knew that a group of angry young male Mexicans with shaved heads and tattoos on their scalps planned to blow up an INS building in Texas, would they therefore have cause to do a strip-search on a middle-aged blonde Canadian lady crossing the border at Niagara Falls?

This is a specific event and not a generilization. You know of a specific group of Mexicans and a target. A terrorist can be any nationality (American), any religion (Christian), and age or sex, and strike anywhere in the world at any particular group. To just say muslims are to be targeted because of a few cases would be like me pointing out of bunch of terrible things that a group of Americans or Christians have done (and lists have been compilied) and then preceding to paint all Americans/Christians with the same brush. It just doesn't work to generlize large groups of people like this, it is the product of a weak mind the can't grasp the larger picture. Anyone can be a terrorist - even people who feel they have good intentions yet still spread terror over the internet through bigotry and ignorance.

How is 'detecting a pattern' in any way equal to spreading hate? I think you are on the wrong thread, or are spouting out of more than one oriface.

The problem is that you are forcing the pattern - if I throw into your list the names of shit loads of other terrorists that are not muslim than you no longer have any pattern. The pattern you create is extremely weak because only a very small percentage of muslims are terrorists (the same goes for and religion).

Learn to think and not just opinionate - you guys are colour-blind to the world - it's not just black and white.

6

citahellion

on Dec 22, 2004

Let me ask you this, mismos:

If the government knew that a group of angry young male Mexicans with shaved heads and tattoos on their scalps planned to blow up an INS building in Texas, would they therefore have cause to do a strip-search on a middle-aged blonde Canadian lady crossing the border at Niagara Falls?

7

Dr Guy

on Dec 22, 2004

The first sign of the Armageddon!!! FARTs have multiplied and spread ignorance and fear over the US like the plague - and are they are now infiltrating the Internet, spreading stupidity and intolerance in an attempt to begin the greatest war ever!!! The rest of the world must racially profile all Americans to stop the spread of these narrow-minded FARTs all over the globe!!! For the good of America and the world - act now!!!

How is 'detecting a pattern' in any way equal to spreading hate? I think you are on the wrong thread, or are spouting out of more than one oriface.

The attack on the olympics in 1978, who did this? FMT.

BTW: It was 72. I know, I was 90 klicks south of the olympics when it happened

8

mismos

on Dec 22, 2004

Nazi are the first people to yell fire in a crowded theatre without provacation

I and others simply see a direct relation to how the Nazis used false propaganda to spread a hatered of the Jews and what is going on here. That is all. Also, I didn't call anyone a Nazis but was only giving a warning that this is the very kind of talk that reminds people of Nazis.

The hate they spew the second someone suggests anything that's even half-way logical

If there was anything 'half-way' logical about it then that would have been fine. But not only is it not logical but there is an major facts that people here have to ignore to come to these conclusions (stated above).

Mismos, your outburst and extreme reaction over the article is as unreasonable, hate filled, and narrow minded as any KKK or Nazi member.

I wasn't presented with any reason so I don't see why I should provide any (even though I did). My experience on this site is that no one listens to reason - especially the poster of this blog.

when the evil poison courses through your very veins.

Well written! I am the son of Satan trying to get people not hate entire populations because of the actions of a few.

No, the world isn't just black and white, but you have no place telling others what colors they must accept because you do.

Isn't that what the writer of this post is doing? I gave reasons which invalidate the thesis of this post so argue that.

9

mismos

on Dec 22, 2004

On the second paragraph, that is just racist and bigotted. You dont know 'us guys" from your aunt Ida, so you just naturally painted us with your bigotted brush. Easy to fall into the trap when you up to your ass in aligators,eh?

I never said I 'knew' you guys and sorry if 'you guys' is derogatory, but exactly how else should I refer to 'you guys'. It can't be racist because I don't know your race. But I can see how you react when you have no reasons to back up you claims - you come back with sophmoric arguments. I don't fall easily to such silly traps like this.

The same people who scream for equality would subjicate, abuse, and repress ANYBODY who does not agree or comply with their demands OF equality.. and there is nothing equal in that.

Classic. The people who support equality are in condratiction when they don't support inequality because they are not being equal to the promoters of inequality. So the idea of equality is pipe dream? What am I to do - I'm a paradox! This is not a real argument either but a logic puzzle. I still don't see any reasoning going on here or any REAL arguments.

10

mismos

on Dec 22, 2004

Strange that we are so profiled, I can't think of any terrorists who have been (or seemed to be) Red-headed, Blue-Eyed, Freckle-faced, left-handed, colorblind, Mormon, Disabled, Military Retirees. ;~D

I can't remember the color of Timothy McVeigh's hair.

The point isn't if Moderateman is the devil or not. If you truely were a champion of equality and desired protection for all people, regardless of their religious, political, or racial beliefs, then while you disagreed with him, you'd respect it no matter what. That's my entire point, which I'm sure will be lost in the whirlwind of defense.

It is about respecting PEOPLE and not about respecting their IDEAS. Even though I allow and accept that people can and will believe whatever they want, I also have the right to question them and bring to light certain things that they seem to be ignoring (continually). This is no whirlwind defense, this is how I've always thought about this. I don't respect this opinion just like I wouldn't (nor most people) respect Hitler's opinion. I don't see why I am forced to respect anybodys opinion? especially an ideal that I abhore.

. For all people to be equal, you must allow people to disagree with you, no matter the ideal behind it

This is silly - I dont allow anybody to do anything - the whole point is we live in a free society where people DO disagree whether I like it or not. I haven't prevented anyone from disagreeing with me. If your ideal is to kill unfit babies at birth, you can hold that ideal and we will disagree - there is no 'allowing' involved. Do you see what I am saying?

In an equal society, a nazi has as much respect and privaledge as a non-Nazi..no matter how unforvable the viewpoint.

Legally absolutely!

You see what I'm saying? And no, you do not have to allow him to act ON his Nazi behavior at someone elses expense. (Deja vu, wow) lol

Actually, what you are saying is quite unclear - especially this last sentence. After you fix some of your mistakes about how I think please reform your argument and get back to me.

11

Dr Guy

on Dec 22, 2004

The problem is that you are forcing the pattern - if I throw into your list the names of shit loads of other terrorists that are not muslim than you no longer have any pattern. The pattern you create is extremely weak because only a very small percentage of muslims are terrorists (the same goes for and religion).

Learn to think and not just opinionate - you guys are colour-blind to the world - it's not just black and white.

Ok, on your first point, shoot me the list. So I can Make a non-biased decision.

On the second paragraph, that is just racist and bigotted. You dont know 'us guys" from your aunt Ida, so you just naturally painted us with your bigotted brush. Easy to fall into the trap when you up to your ass in aligators,eh?

12

ParaTed2k

on Dec 22, 2004

I am a Red-headed, Blue-Eyed, Freckle-faced, left-handed, colorblind, Mormon, Disabled, Military Retiree. I only fly a few times a year, but everytime I have flown, I have been "Randomized". I wonder how many other Red-headed, Blue-Eyed, Freckle-faced, left-handed, colorblind, Mormon, Disabled, Military Retirees get "randomized" everytime they fly? I would bet that the percentage of Red-headed, Blue-Eyed, Freckle-faced, left-handed, colorblind, Mormon, Disabled, Military Retirees who get "randomized" 100% of the time they fly is pretty high.

Strange that we are so profiled, I can't think of any terrorists who have been (or seemed to be) Red-headed, Blue-Eyed, Freckle-faced, left-handed, colorblind, Mormon, Disabled, Military Retirees. ;~D

13

Dr Guy

on Dec 22, 2004

I never said I 'knew' you guys and sorry if 'you guys' is derogatory, but exactly how else should I refer to 'you guys'. It can't be racist because I don't know your race. But I can see how you react when you have no reasons to back up you claims - you come back with sophmoric arguments. I don't fall easily to such silly traps like this.

I ask for the list you offered to provide, and instead you defend a bigotted statement. There is no correlation between the Nazi/Jew issue and this. No one is alledging anything, just stating facts. And you accuse me of not having any facts? Where are your facts? Instead of facts, we get a defense of bigotry. Sad, very sad.

14

messybuu

on Dec 22, 2004

If there was anything 'half-way' logical about it then that would have been fine. But not only is it not logical but there is an major facts that people here have to ignore to come to these conclusions (stated above).

If there's a significant number of non-Muslim terrorists who have hijacked planes, then I'd love to see a list, and I'll definitely have to rethink my views, but until then, it appears that most hijackers are Muslims, and although you might want to search people in an airport who don't fit such a profile, I'd rather search the people most likely to fit that profile. If searching them is hateful, then is it hateful to search a non-Muslim woman in her fifties?

I wasn't presented with any reason so I don't see why I should provide any (even though I did). My experience on this site is that no one listens to reason - especially the poster of this blog.

Perhaps there's many different views of reason, and not all of them are parallel with yours. It also doesn't help that your reason comes with such an unreasonable tone. Do you see how that would cause a problem?

Well written! I am the son of Satan trying to get people not hate entire populations because of the actions of a few.

I don't see who hates Muslims here. If you do, and you want people to listen to you, you shouldn't speak with such hostility. Presentation matters, and if you throw tantrums like a child, you will be regarded like one.

15

mismos

on Dec 22, 2004

I ask for the list you offered to provide, and instead you defend a bigotted statement. There is no correlation between the Nazi/Jew issue and this. No one is alledging anything, just stating facts. And you accuse me of not having any facts? Where are your facts? Instead of facts, we get a defense of bigotry. Sad, very sad.

You got me, I'm the bigot not you. What facts should I be providing? Backing up my statement that Americans/Christians have done volient acts in the past and present? Why would I need to provide any facts unless you believe that Americans/Christians have never done anything wrong in their entire history. Also, read a book on how the Nazi party promoted their anti-Jew propaganda and you will see parellels.

If there's a significant number of non-Muslim terrorists who have hijacked planes, then I'd love to see a list, and I'll definitely have to rethink my views, but until then, it appears that most hijackers are Muslims, and although you might want to search people in an airport who don't fit such a profile, I'd rather search the people most likely to fit that profile. If searching them is hateful, then is it hateful to search a non-Muslim woman in her fifties?

Terrorists don't just hihack planes you realize and this post isn't just about hijackers. Also although I don't sit in front of a pile of stats I am positive there have been non-Muslims that have hijacked planes before. If you NEED an instance then you really are as narrow-minded as I thought you were. How many muslims have hijacked planes in the US in the last 50 years. Three or Four? out of about a billion muslims? Your odds are really really slim.

Perhaps there's many different views of reason, and not all of them are parallel with yours. It also doesn't help that your reason comes with such an unreasonable tone. Do you see how that would cause a problem?

I am sorry but I find the tone of this post quite malicious.

I don't see who hates Muslims here. If you do, and you want people to listen to you, you shouldn't speak with such hostility. Presentation matters, and if you throw tantrums like a child, you will be regarded like one.

So people here don't hate Muslims but just feel like they are inheritely out to kill them. Thanks for the clarification. Personally I find people of this mentality hard headed so I had no intention of debating with people who generalize so broadly and think in such a narrow frame-work.

You cannot pick and choose the social group/race/religion/creed/nationality you acknowledge in your "equal status". By doing so you are treating a GROUP OF PEOPLE inequally, no matter the reason.

I am sorry, could you clarify this. It sounds interesting but I don't understand what you mean when you say "I can't pick and choose"... I don't classify people as such, everyone is a individual to me and that is all. That is how everyone is equal. Some people aren't as intellegent as others thought - that's a given. I think we hold different concepts of what 'equality' means.

If I claimed I didn't like black people because they promote violence with gangster rap and leaching off of society, my reasoning of their inferority (while they might be 110% rational to me) could classify me as a racist..especially to those like you, mismos.

Yes you indeed would be a racist. Now if the state believed 'that' and started stopping all black people violating their rights - do you believe that the state would be in the right? Maybe you do.

Yet..if I don't agree with you that they are equal, you would reason I am inferior for not subscribing to your ideas..which would then brand you as a racist..lowering you to my level. If you can claimsomebody is inferior for their beliefs, no matter how whacko/insane/crazy it might be, then you have stopped promoting equality. The end

I don't subscribe to the idea that anyone is inferior - even you. If I did (and I do) disagree with this idea that all blacks are inferior - I would simply be in disagreement with YOU - an INDIVIDUAL - not your race (whatever race you are - I can't be racist againist you if I don't know your race - You should really read the definition of racism - or maybe go back further and read up on the definition of a race - then racism). Beliefs don't make people unequal, only stupid.

Also, for your info, I believe different people can be inferior to others - but people are always going to be equal. When I say 'equal' I am not refering to wealth or physique or mentality, just RIGHTS - the right to think and feel and be. But people can be inferior to others in many different aspects just as the same person can be superior in other aspects. I think people definetily tend to confuse individuals (which are actual) with races/peoples (which are general/statistical/abstracts).

I repeat: Not black and white - colour.