America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
Let there be booze!
Published on May 14, 2007 By Moderateman In Philosophy

 An Eighteen year old can, Marry, have children, go to work, Raise children. look out for their welfare.

 An eighteen year old can operate heavy machinery, Drive a car, Climb tall buildings walk on a thin piece of iron to weld it together.

An eighteen year old can go to war, die for his country, carry deadly weapons in war and in peace.

Operate helicopters, repair them too.

Vote for the President, their Senator, their representative in the house, the Mayor of the city they live in, the Governor of the state they reside in.

In other words they have every right and responsibility a 21 year old, a 30 year old, a 50 year old , a 90 year old person has except for one thing.

SIMPLY THEY CANNOT BELLY up to a bar and have a beer if they want one. I find this insane, demeaning to them and downright silly to deny a returning hero from a war, the right to have a beer with his father in a bar to celebrate his safe return, all because he is 17, 18, 19 or 20 years of age!


Comments (Page 3)
4 Pages1 2 3 4 
on May 15, 2007
You cannot drink until you are 21 in the military, even overseas. It happens to be our most common Non-judicial punishment here. Even in Texas where your parents or spouse (Of legal age)can take an 18 year old into a bar for a legal drink.
I was going to take my 18 year old out for a beer but the Army would still have considered me to be supplying alcohol to minors.
on May 16, 2007
You cannot drink until you are 21 in the military, even overseas


Not exactly...DOD Instruction 1015.10 (in part here)


The minimum drinking age on a DoD installation located in a State (including the District of Columbia) shall be consistent with the age established by the law of that State as the State minimum drinking age. Minimum drinking age means the minimum age established for persons who may purchase, possess, or consume alcoholic beverages.

In the case of a DoD installation located in more than one State or in one State but within 50 miles of another State or Mexico or Canada, the minimum drinking age on that DoD installation shall be the lowest applicable age of the State in which the DoD installation is located or the State or jurisdiction of Mexico or Canada that is within 50 miles of such DoD installation.

The minimum drinking age on a DoD installation located outside the United States shall be 18 years of age. Higher minimum drinking age will be based on international treaties and agreements and on the local situation as determined by the local installation commander.


http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/dodreg/bldodreg1015-10i.htm
on May 16, 2007
thanks tova and the other comments...as i suspected, there were many different perspectives, mostly based on experience on this. i think ti's safe to say at this point that what i was told 20 years ago, on the whole, had some truth to it. hmmmmm, guess tex's flip answer was illinformed.

and tex...when you were 19, it wasn't "illegal" for you to go on a test drive without your mom. that's just a sales tactic dealers use. they cite "insurance" and so forth, and it's baloney.

technically, it's the salesman who is covered under the insurance. technically, salespeople are supposed to go on all test drives, per that insurance agreement. when they are in the car with their "T-Tag" in the back window, the car is insured. you have permission to drive it, your mom doesn't figure into that legality. some dealers allow customers to go on test drives on their own, which is technically not allowed under most insurance agreements, unless additional paperwork is filled out. this happens when a car is "puppydogged" (given to the cust. overnight) usually.

and when they skip that paperwork and there is a problem (like an accident),,,it's funny to see these guys scramble to cover their ass, posthumously.

the real reason they want your mom in the dealership is because , statistically, a 19 year old is rarely the "decider" and quite often, doesn't even have any authorization to buy a car. sometimes the parent cosigns or pays for the car...etc, etc...

example: like when a parent off handedly says "MAYBE we'll think about getting you a car somewhere down the road" and the kid responds with shopping dealers the very next day. then the parent gets hit with "mom, i found a car, can we buy it?" and the parent is like..."no way, i was talking about a year or 2 from now" or whatever...

car dealers deal with these kids all the time and getting the parent involved is a "qualifier." that way they know their time isn't being wasted. after all, many salespeople live off of commissions, not hourly wages and "thank you's " for their time.

but it had nothing to do with "the law." just time-tested sales practices.
on May 16, 2007
SC: Go fuck yourself.
on May 16, 2007
SC: Go fuck yourself.


how mature.

have a nice day tex.   
on May 18, 2007
(Citizen)Texas WahineMay 16, 2007 13:40:52


SC: Go fuck yourself.


wow that's a first, I must mark this day On my calender.
on May 18, 2007
(Citizen)Sean Conners aka SConn1May 16, 2007 13:50:47


how mature.

have a nice day tex.


I would say nice response if I din't know "have a nice day" after being told go fuck yourself, translates into "go fuck yourself too"
on May 18, 2007
(Citizen)little-whipMay 18, 2007 12:48:15


And on topic- I wouldn't lower the drinking age to 18, I'd raise the age for all those other things to 21.

Lord knows teenagers are foolhardy enough without adding alcohol for courage.


The drinking age is 21 and that never stopped me and you and million other kids under 21 from getting loaded.
on May 18, 2007
I would say nice response if I din't know "have a nice day" after being told go fuck yourself, translates into "go fuck yourself too"


now, now...we've been there...and it means "have a nice day."

facts are i apologized thoroughly to tex, whether or not she read it and ignored it or never saw it, i don't know. but i do know that when she has violated her b/l on my site, i have been cordial, as she really didn't say anything too bad or anything, and it was a 1 time thing. and i do know that i've stayed off her site as she has requested.

here, i answered her question. i thought she might like to know that a salesperson was workin her so that next time, she might be more in tune with it and be able to get herself a better deal.

she replied with her filth.

i said have a nice day. it meant, have a nice day.

her answer was juvinile, and i ended on a gentlemanly note. i genuinely hope she has a nice day. i regret she can't even deal with having a civil conversation with me.

but feel free to read whatever you want into it.

on May 18, 2007
translates into "go fuck yourself too"


I already did, and it was great. Haha.

SC: I didn't buy the car. The salesperson didn't tell me that. It was on the paperwork for the promotion (I test drove the car to get free tickets to a movie).

And yes, you are the consummate gentleman. Thank for you for taking the time to set me straight. Imagine how uncouth JU would be without you.
on May 18, 2007
(Citizen)little-whipMay 18, 2007 13:32:10


btw, elie, neither meg nor myself can get an email through to you.


call me tomorrow or sunday if ya can, i'll give you her new address.


Meg and I have been E-mailing I have all her new stuff and already sent her house warming gifts. Check your email now to see if you received my test email
on May 18, 2007
(Citizen)Sean Conners aka SConn1May 18, 2007 14:04:17


I would say nice response if I din't know "have a nice day" after being told go fuck yourself, translates into "go fuck yourself too"


now, now...we've been there...and it means "have a nice day."


I am going to give you the benifit of the doubt and say ok I believe you.
on May 18, 2007
I am going to give you the benifit of the doubt and say ok I believe you.


thanks...seems i'm damned if i do, damned if i don't in some other folk's book.
on May 18, 2007
(Citizen)Sean Conners aka SConn1May 18, 2007 15:48:52


I am going to give you the benifit of the doubt and say ok I believe you.


thanks...seems i'm damned if i do, damned if i don't in some other folk's book.


sean you do seem to fued a little more than average, and tex? heck man No one fued with her, Me and whip I can understand fighting with, we polorize people, but tex> sheeesh man ..







on May 18, 2007
and tex? heck man No one fued with her


and neither did i...apparantly, i offended her in a conversation about parenting since i have a different view. i was cursed at and insulted. that's where it started.

as billy joel said,,,i didn't start the fire.

but as far as i am concerned, i've offered apologies for any misunderstandings or anything i might have said that offended her...but she prefers her lil games, curses and insults. i'll just continue to do what i do, regardless. i've washed my hands.

whip is a lil lying hypocrite in my view, and aside from avoiding being "swiftboated" when i see fit, and have time to wallow in the muck, i just ignore the lil troll. i know she's your friend and i respect that, far be it from me to try to dictate whom someone should befriend.

and as far as you go man, i thoroghly enjoy debating with you. except when you thought i insulted you once when i was trying to pay you a compliment, i like our discussions.

and especially since you had your scare over the winter, you seem to have a fresh appreciation for what is important. and that has added an extra enjoyment. you and i know we still and may always have certain diferences of opinion, but you are not a liar, nor do you make a habit out of stalking me like some others. btw, i take that (obsessive stalking of me by whip) as a compliment.

i've been writing a long time, on and offline, and my skin is like kevlar. and i'd rather go into the "belly of the beast" to debate the war and the current politics and other beliefs than go hang in some "mutual admiration society" where everyone agreed on everything. i'm not here to be popular, obviously. of course, being popular is nice. but i'd rather be the scurge of JU and have people read my viewpoint and as i see it, truths...than be all popular. i could make anti iraq war and anti administration posts on some other places and get people who already feel tha t way to pat me on the back, but what good is that? to me, on a medium that could potentially reach anyone who is anywhere,,,no good at all.

and i feud here a little more than average probably because of my dissenting views. of course, that will prob. be mocked too, lol. of course, i have made the mistake of being too direct or strong with people, like with tex, where i was too hard and such. but when i offer repeated apologies and am met with more hostility each time...i know at that point, it's not me.

and when whip does her lil dance and that includes shitting on my birthday...something that was just beyond tasteless. and all her lil friends jumped around with glee like witches around a fire, for a good week celebrating that shitting...and she can't even see that this was dead wrong, let alone totally unprovoked (as most things with her lil napoleonic self are) and offer a simple apology...again, i know it's not me.

and i consider some attempts to ridicule me a sure sign that certain people are quite neurotic about the fact that they can't silence me...it's flattering.

God tells us about people who will try to ridicule and try to mock true faith. and the latest featured article is just more proof to me of God's existence.

if i get a chance, i'll have to personally thank brad and the stardock crew  

lastly,,,again,,,you choose your friends and that is between you and them. but allow me to apologize for letting the "Sean v Whip" feud bleed onto your pages. but you seemed to be asking for a response, and it would have been rude of me to ignore it. sorry for the filibuster tho.

take care:)

and really...have a nice day:)

4 Pages1 2 3 4