America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
The only applause they can get is when they applaud themselves
Published on February 1, 2006 By Moderateman In Politics
Although I understand how disheartened and how badly the DEMOCRATS are in disarray one could only feel sorry for the idiots
that not only continue to obstruct but stood in the middle of the State of the Union address to applaud themselves for doing what? Obstructing once again something that NEEDS to be addressed, IE: the repair of Social Security.

Leading the pack of snarling Dogs with a big stupid grin on her face was of course the front runner for President in 2008 Shrillary Clinton.

I agree the being at odd with the President is not a bad thing, but to blatantly Disrespect the office of the President on a feed that will be shown world wide shows once again the total lack of regard the Democrats have for anyone but themselves.

This is the Party that wants to lead the United States into the 21st century? HA! I would rather be led by the ayatollahs of Iran, at least with them you know where you stand.

Democratic party of America? you disgust me!
Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 01, 2006

I am glad I did not watch the SOTU speech.  I probably would have thrown something through the TV.

Now I know some liberal is going to jump up and relate an anecdote about Clinton and how it was turn about and fair play.  Funny, I dont ever remember such show of disrespect for Clinton.  Indeed, even after Clinton sullied himself, the other side still seeemed to give the office a lot of rspect.  But hey, that was just me I guess.

on Feb 01, 2006
Virulent vomiting vitriol
on Feb 01, 2006
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Wednesday, February 01, 2006I am glad I did not watch the SOTU speech. I probably would have thrown something through the TV.


I came close to flinging a glass full of juice at Tv doc. colleen was watching and said those magic words.. "elie? breathe"
on Feb 01, 2006
"I came close to flinging a glass full of juice at Tv doc."

You sad bastard!
on Feb 01, 2006
#4 by pigsback.com (Anonymous user)
Wednesday, February 01, 2006


I came close to flinging a glass full of juice at Tv doc."

You sad bastard!


I know who my mom and dad are, bitch! do you?
on Feb 01, 2006
"I know who my mom and dad are, bitch! do you?"

My parents are dead. What's that got to do with anything anyway?
on Feb 01, 2006
6 by pigsback.com (Anonymous user)
Wednesday, February 01, 2006


My parents are dead. What's that got to do with anything anyway?


so watching you born was too much for them? they just keeled over and died at the sight of your ugly face.
on Feb 01, 2006
I don't loose my temper. However, after last evening public antics, just the thought of H.Clinton and her ill-mannered and morally bankrupt playmates leading our great nation is enough motivation for me to up the party donation ante.
on Feb 01, 2006
#8 by TitanI9
Wednesday, February 01, 2006


don't loose my temper. However, after last evening public antics, just the thought of H.Clinton and her ill-mannered and morally bankrupt playmates leading our great nation is enough motivation for me to up the party donation ante.


I was just very upset to see such blatant disrespect in a public forum. I am glad the right does not behave in such a manner.
on Feb 01, 2006
Hi MM, you and I seemed to be on the same wavelength on this one, as I wrote up an article discussing the same thing last nite after watching the SOTU and seeing the news following.

The Democrats should be lambasted over their behavior, as it was completely and totally disgusting. They are sticking future generations with the bankrupt and bereft of any real social benefit so called social security system. They refuse to fix it because it's one of their greatest accomplishments. They pulled the ultimate bait and switch when they let FDR stick the public with that system, and now they don't want to fix it and don't want to allow anyone else to fix it.

They should be tried as the treasonous bastards that they are, for robbing everyone of their wealth and their own future wealth. Perhaps some slick lawyer will one day figure out a way to sue the congress over it's mismanagement of the social security system, and maybe, just maybe, they will be the catalyst to spur real reform of the broken system. Or at least I can hope so.
on Feb 01, 2006
#10 by terpfan1980
Wednesday, February 01, 2006


Hi MM, you and I seemed to be on the same wavelength on this one


not that unusual for us to agree.

The Democrats should be lambasted over their behavior, as it was completely and totally disgusting. They are sticking future generations with the bankrupt and bereft of any real social benefit so called social security system. They refuse to fix it because it's one of their greatest accomplishments. They pulled the ultimate bait and switch when they let FDR stick the public with that system, and now they don't want to fix it and don't want to allow anyone else to fix it.


what continues to amaze me is the democrats stance S.S. is just fine and needs no help.
on Feb 01, 2006
what continues to amaze me is the democrats stance S.S. is just fine and needs no help.


In a few years they'll be saying it's an emergency and must be fixed, and that they've been saying it for 20 years (since the first Clinton administration if not before).

I hope folks will remind the public that they were the stone-wallers that stopped any fix now before the problem really became an emergency, but I am not counting on that happening.
on Feb 01, 2006
Usually when an official puts a family member in charge of an important government effort people scream nepotism. Oddly, when Clinton gave his wife the job of reform, someone with no political power at all and no business doing anything but having teas for dignitaries, no one said much.

Now, they even forget that she was in charge of the mess that she is trying to keep other people from cleaning up. I guess I'd be bitter too if I had been put in charge of reforming something that ended up so entirely messed up. I think the press should really look harder at Hillary's sour grapes.
on Feb 01, 2006
12 by terpfan1980
Wednesday, February 01, 2006


In a few years they'll be saying it's an emergency and must be fixed, and that they've been saying it for 20 years (since the first Clinton administration if not before).

I hope folks will remind the public that they were the stone-wallers that stopped any fix now before the problem really became an emergency, but I am not counting on that happening.


Lets hope the right side of the aisle agrees to fix things then instead of reminding the left there is no problem.
on Feb 01, 2006
13 by BakerStreet
Wednesday, February 01, 2006


Usually when an official puts a family member in charge of an important government effort people scream nepotism. Oddly, when Clinton gave his wife the job of reform, someone with no political power at all and no business doing anything but having teas for dignitaries, no one said much.


Not so odd baker, it's only bad when the right does it according to left thinking.When the left regains power {and sadly they will one day} one can only hope that the lessons of 2000 through 2008 are not lost on the sitting republicans.
2 Pages1 2