Democrats Demand more records.

Judge Roberts and the Democrats.

Published on August 22, 2005 By Moderateman In US Domestic

Since the left can find no real reason to stop the nomination of the honorable Judge Roberts for SCOTUS, they are as usual looking for anything to latch on to so the can obstruct his appointment.

The Democrats are now demanding Judge Roberts kindergarten records to see if at anytime he refused to take a nap Also in question is Judge Robers failed his very first math exam in grade school, which should disqualify him from any cases with money involved. The Democrats will continue to ask for records till they have read every piece of paper about Judge Roberts in the futile search for anything no matter how slight to latch on to In order to continue to do what they do best, OBSTRUCT anything President Bush wants. When will the left do anything but obstruct? I for one am damn tired of it, the left now has over 130,000 documents about Roberts, is not this enough?

Comments (Page 1)

Dr Guy

on Aug 22, 2005

I think they are asking for the kindergarten records to see if he stole any milk money.

ParaTed2k

on Aug 22, 2005

Just think how it will be in 10 years or so when a candidates blog from when he or she was just a face in the cybercrowd....

Sometimes I joke to myself while I'm writing an article.... "well, there goes my shot at the Supreme Court!" ;~D

Daiwa

on Aug 22, 2005

It is very transparent & tiresome what they are doing.

The Dems are amazing - stuck in a hole deep as the Grand Canyon & all they do is demand more shovels.

Cheers,
Daiwa

Moderateman

on Aug 22, 2005

Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Monday, August 22, 2005I think they are asking for the kindergarten records to see if he stole any milk money.

nope he once refused to take a nap and now the democrats claim that shows he is a rebel and will legislate from the bench.

Moderateman

on Aug 22, 2005

Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Monday, August 22, 2005Just think how it will be in 10 years or so when a candidates blog from when he or she was just a face in the cybercrowd....Sometimes I joke to myself while I'm writing an article.... "well, there goes my shot at the Supreme Court!" ;~D

sadly I never had a shot at the law, my bad conduct discharge prevents that. oh well. sniff

Moderateman

on Aug 22, 2005

Reply By: DaiwaPosted: Monday, August 22, 2005It is very transparent & tiresome what they are doing.The Dems are amazing - stuck in a hole deep as the Grand Canyon & all they do is demand more shovels.Cheers,Daiwa

I just hope the general public will remember election day how much the left obstructed and stonewalled.

Dr Guy

on Aug 22, 2005

nope he once refused to take a nap and now the democrats claim that shows he is a rebel and will legislate from the bench.

I got pictures of him stealing little susies milk money. Wonder how much Dirty Harry Reid will pay for them?

ParaTed2k

on Aug 22, 2005

MM were you rotten to the Corps? ;~D

Texas Wahine

on Aug 22, 2005

MM were you rotten to the Corps?

Bwahahahhahhaa...nice pun. Hehe.

Moderateman

on Aug 22, 2005

Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Monday, August 22, 2005MM were you rotten to the Corps? ;~D

I get it, but sadly was rotten to a very new 2ndlt. seems there is some kind of rule about "no slapping officers" Imagine that?

Moderateman

on Aug 22, 2005

Reply By: Texas WahinePosted: Monday, August 22, 2005MM were you rotten to the Corps?Bwahahahhahhaa...nice pun. Hehe.

very nice, made me smile.

hey tex???

bump.

ParaTed2k

on Aug 22, 2005

Ah, so you were busted in a Butter Bar Brawl! ;~D

Moderateman

on Aug 23, 2005

Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Monday, August 22, 2005Ah, so you were busted in a Butter Bar Brawl! ;~D

was no brawl there was just 2 thuds, the first me hitting him the second him hitting the deck.

ParaTed2k

on Aug 23, 2005

... and a third.. you hitting the block! ;~D

kingbee

on Aug 23, 2005

one of the reasons for my mistrust of bush was my envisioning a scenario like this one. considering the congress passed a law specifying a reasonable amount of time between the end of an administration and the date upon which its records (all except those judged to be a legitimate threat to national security) would revert to the people who paid for them--and considering ronald reagan lenghtened that time period a bit more--there was no valid or defensible reason for gwbush to keep us in the dark for generations.

unreasonable government secrecy is anathema to our traditions and ideals. it also inspires justifiable suspicion.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!