Democrats Demand more records.

Judge Roberts and the Democrats.

Published on August 22, 2005 By Moderateman In US Domestic

Since the left can find no real reason to stop the nomination of the honorable Judge Roberts for SCOTUS, they are as usual looking for anything to latch on to so the can obstruct his appointment.

The Democrats are now demanding Judge Roberts kindergarten records to see if at anytime he refused to take a nap Also in question is Judge Robers failed his very first math exam in grade school, which should disqualify him from any cases with money involved. The Democrats will continue to ask for records till they have read every piece of paper about Judge Roberts in the futile search for anything no matter how slight to latch on to In order to continue to do what they do best, OBSTRUCT anything President Bush wants. When will the left do anything but obstruct? I for one am damn tired of it, the left now has over 130,000 documents about Roberts, is not this enough?

Comments (Page 2)

Moderateman

on Aug 24, 2005

Reply By: kingbeePosted: Tuesday, August 23, 2005one of the reasons for my mistrust of bush was my envisioning a scenario like this one. considering the congress passed a law specifying a reasonable amount of time between the end of an administration and the date upon which its records (all except those judged to be a legitimate threat to national security) would revert to the people who paid for them--and considering Ronald Reagan lengthened that time period a bit more--there was no valid or defensible reason for gw bush to keep us in the dark for generations. unreasonable government secrecy is anathema to our traditions and ideals. it also inspires justifiable suspicion.

I do not like government secrecy either kingbee, but this is so obviously a fishing expedition, No white house council has ever been made to turn over records, not one, also the has never been a religious "litmus test"

Dr Guy

on Aug 24, 2005

Basically it amounts to them wanting to see his doodling. Since doodling is in the eyes of the beholder, they can interpret it any way they want to spin it, and you know it will not be in a flattering way.

Daiwa

on Aug 24, 2005

unreasonable government secrecy is anathema to our traditions and ideals. it also inspires justifiable suspicion.

It may be anathema, but happens to have been SOP for a loooong time now. Take the Kennedy assassination, for instance. You have the same reason to mistrust any and all presidents, kb, not just 43.

Cheers,
Daiwa

Moderateman

on Aug 24, 2005

14 by ParaTed2k
Tuesday, August 23, 2005

and a third.. you hitting the block! ;~D

30 days in the brig.. bcd, loss of all pay, busted to private.

was excused due to battle fatigue, remember that term?

Moderateman

on Aug 24, 2005

#17 by Dr. Guy
Wednesday, August 24, 2005

do not like government secrecy either kingbee, but this is so obviously a fishing expedition, No white house council has ever been made to turn over records, not one, also the has never been a religious "litmus test"

Basically it amounts to them wanting to see his doodling. Since doodling is in the eyes of the beholder, they can interpret it any way they want to spin it, and you know it will not be in a flattering way.

totally a fishing trip, looking for anything to OBSTRUCT.

Moderateman

on Aug 24, 2005

18 by Daiwa
Wednesday, August 24, 2005

I have never trusted any President since JFK and I was to young to know better than to trust him.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!