Unbelievable. Unfrickinbelievable. I have to be seeing things. Let me clean my glasses. Nope, still there. In this day and age of terror threats you actually suggest giving away nuclear warheads to three more nations? You take the typical American route where more violence will stop the violence. That more bombs in Iraq will bring peace. That more men in Iraq would bring stability. What total insane thinking. Spreading nuclear bombs around Asia. Real smart idea. To think that you have to be young and ignorant with no sense of history. Iraq was America's friend. The US gave him illegal WMD. Iraq later becomes an enemy. Russia invades Afghanistan. US supports and supplies Osama Bin Laden and the future Taliban with some top-of-the-line portable missle launchers to fight the Russians. Osama and the Taliban become America's enemy. Do you understand that concept? People have to think more rationally with an overall better sense of reality and real history. American pilots are getting shot down by American supplied rocket launchers. Many Soviet weapons as well, and I will be doing a report on that one soon. The whole concept of raising the number of nations that have nuclear weapons is insane at best and typical thinking at worst.

except the ceasefire of 1953,whats to lose doc?

They already violated that many times.  But to answer your question.  Our soul.  Becoming that which we fight against means they win.

If you look into it there is a cultural war going on with the Chinese over their shared history as well. I

Actually, the Koreans are descended from the Japanese, not Chinese. Or actually the Japanese are descended from the Koreans (and thus the rivalry and hatred).

You're saying I am just making it up? lol.. whatever...

You're saying I am just making it up? lol.. whatever...

Who are you responding to?  If me, I accuse nothing.  I only clarify and edumacate.

You take the typical American route where more violence will stop the violence.

Wrong! It's the threat of violence

China will never let it happen let Korea have a bomb. They want the US to invade or strike North Korea before the completion of the bomb, so we look like the bad guys. If that nut called Kim gets a bomb, he is most likely to use it. Giving the US a perfect pretext to take out North Korea, with out looking like the bad guy and giving China one less ally in Asia. Expect that if North Korea test a bomb that a very bad accident will soon follow destroying the program. Then China could blame on the US or Japan for the accident too if they pulled it off right.

Not only will Korea use a bomb to never have to worry about an attack from South Korea or the US. But they may stop being as much of a lapdog to China too. Another thing China don't want (i.e. a cocky Korea).

but it's not europe negociating with the N.K. its russia , japan, south K, china and america, as usual europe is sitting on the sidelines

I know that, but with their anti-nuke views and pecae views, having two, three or so more countires with nukes would make them a little uneasy, especially if their relations with those countries are only "so-so" ......

Reply #31 By: Reiki-House - 5/12/2005 11:37:12 AM

I think giving, SK,Japan, and maybe other countries nukes, the only negative is whether they are rational enough to not use one, other wise i think it would result in MAD, Mutually Assured Destruction, [i.e. opponent builds weapon, we build bigger and better one]...for the most part it keeps either countries form lobbing one over thier border at each other, because if they did, then buh-bye earth/country...best anagram i've ever heard...

sorry about abondening my blogsite for a bit, but needed some space and took off to a friends home for an overnighter, reading all
you guys {kindbee docguy and baker mostly} but a few others shows me why I just love free discussion, It constantly makes me think out of my own box, a huge thankyou too all that replied here {even if I did not agree with some}

Reiki.. there IS NOTHING america can do to please you. ever. get a life. will ya? and stop bashing my country, you unamerican hatrer of all things american foreigner.

Reply By: thatoneguyinslcPosted: Thursday, May 12, 2005Mod,I was giving King his props on bringing up the 6 country negoti

gotcha.. sorry.

This artical is a perfect example of how if people like you were to ever get into a position of power the US would probably die a slow horrible death. The artical sounds like something Osama Bin Larden would write. And also when you call Reiki-House unAmerican you making the assumption that most Americans  think like you, which they obviously do not.

Giving South Korea nukes has to be out of the question. One of North Korea's main targets is Seoul, the Capital of SOuth Korea. The North Koreans would pick up on the fact that we are supplying South Korea with missles and they would strike right off the bat.

As far as China goes, I compare China to the big kid that wants to fight the other big kid(U.S.) but wont because of all those kids buddies(U.N.). As long as the RED stays contained to China and North Korea(The little kid that picks fights and has no idea what they are getting into) I think we will be fine. But when the Red starts to spread again, we might have ourselves another Cold War

You do realize, as long as the DPRK exists, there is just another defensive shield around PRC? If the USA is tied down in South Korea (more likely, due to how quickly they are likely to be owned) or Taiwan (less likely, due to a wierd string of death around the world - la fayette), the more protected PRC is in actuality?