America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
Simple, But the truth of things
Published on November 16, 2008 By Moderateman In Religion

I subscribe to NO RELIGION in particular, even though I Identify with being a JEW because simply enough I was born one.

I find all Religion an anthema, For one very easy reason, they all subscribe to the following " OUR WAY IS THE ONLY WAY TO G-D'S HOUSE"! As soon as I hear this one statement from any religion they lose me completely. My personal belief is there are many paths to G-D's house after death and for any ONE religion to lay claim to know G-D's mind in this matter is hypocrisy to the nth degree.

No human can possibly know G-D's mind or how he feels about what it takes to get to his house. We must remember the bibles,  both old and new were written by man not the hand of G-D, far as I can tell nothing of this earth was written by G-d him or herself, so this leaves out all this religious wars in HIS name as a reason, truthfully religious wars are made because of men trying to impose their interpretation of what other men wrote on other men and women. there can be no war in G-D's name because no one can understand what G-D wants in the first place. I hear many people say their way is the only way to G-D's house; what a crock! How dare anyone think they can exclude billions of people from a loving G-D's home because they are not of the same "religion" yet I see and hear this constantly! all I have to say is world? get a clue; no one religion has locks on how to get to G-D's house after death. not a single one!


Comments (Page 15)
18 PagesFirst 13 14 15 16 17  Last
on Dec 16, 2008

Very interesting and I agree without doubt with your concluding statement. ...might even cause all out war?

Yes, it would. But not because of anything in Islam, Judaism, or Christianity, but simply because the PLO and Hamas and other groups use ANYTHING as a reason for war.

 

Why, if Jewish law and God's law prohibits the rebuilding, would Jews have a "right" to rebuild it? 

Different authorities. There is no earthly authority that can prohibit Jews from doing what they want in their holy city (it has been tried but the Jews are now back and able to defend themselves).

Jewish belief is the only limit. Jews believe that G-d prohibits it and that's why they don't do it. I have the right to eat pork too, but don't do it.

 

Also, if there is Scripture, could you cite the texts where God's law prohibits rebuilding the Temple?  

Ask a rabbi. I don't know these things. The Israeli Chief Rabbinate says so and that is good enough for me. I am sure they know where to look. (And it's walking on the ground, not specifically rebuilding that is forbidden.)

 

on Dec 16, 2008

Goodness,

As I read through these posts I wonder what is the motivation. How far away from daily religious life they are. Study is one thing, gleeful prognostication based in snippets of text is quite another. It does nothing but keep the prognosticator in his or her head. 

It is best to study scripture, in my opinion, as a guide for living in this world. We should not study for getting a good seat in the next, but rather, for the sake of making this world a better world for all of life, including God.

All of this imagining of when the Christian Jesus will "return" does nothing if Christians wait.  Jews are commanded by God to make themselves holy and this process is a process of developing chesed, lovingkindness, and tzadik, justice, and t'filah, (prayer turned toward an inward assessment in order to make ourselves acceptable to God).  All of this has to do with the here and now, which, Lula, is God's here and now in God's world.

Be well

 

 

on Dec 16, 2008

As I read through these posts I wonder what is the motivation.

My motivation is study of specific texts and defending Judaism (and Islam, of no Muslims are here to speak up). My motivation is also to correct misunderstandings about Judaism and scripture.

I like having texts pointed out to me so I know what to focus on. KFC does a good job when it comes to that.

Being confronted with specific Biblical texts does miracles for my knowledge of Hebrew and seeing Bible texts in Aramaic helps a lot with understanding differences between Semitic languages.

Does it have anything to do with religion? No.

Will it help me understand G-d better? No.

Those things are the domains of practice and spirituality. But I view religion as a part of life rather than a focal point of my existence and spirituality as something that one has to have a talent for.

 

 

on Dec 16, 2008

My motivation is study of specific texts and defending Judaism (and Islam, of no Muslims are here to speak up). My motivation is also to correct misunderstandings about Judaism and scripture.

 

And an excellent motivation I might add.  It is strange to me that you do not see this effort as allowing you to get closer to God or that you don't even see it as religious.  In effect you are like a biblical/talmudic scholar examining closely the meanings, but resist absorbing them into your heart?

Be well.

on Dec 16, 2008

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the Talmud, "reworked" Scripture?

 

Hello Lula,  No. Talmud is a continuous study and application of Torah to living in the everyday world.  For a simple example, God commands us not to light a fire on Shabbat.  Today we have electric fire made by the flick of a switch.  Is this a violation of the commandment?   Talmudic discussion would turn this question inside out trying to discover both the actual meaning of the scripture itself, but also how to apply it in changing times.

 

Be well.

on Dec 16, 2008

It is strange to me that you do not see this effort as allowing you to get closer to God or that you don't even see it as religious. 

It is an activity that can be religious but it can also be done for other reasons. I wouldn't call debunking Christian myths a religious activity.

The wisdom in the Tanakh is true regardless of whether its author is G-d. Believing that G-d is the author is a mechanism to make us pay more attention to the law. It is not necessary if the law in itself is seen as valuable.

My personal belief is that G-d doesn't care as much if we keep the laws but cares if we are good people. Study of Torah is perhaps necessary to be a good Jew but certainly not to be a good human being. But debunking Christian myths does not bring me closer to G-d.

 

In effect you are like a biblical/talmudic scholar examining closely the meanings, but resist absorbing them into your heart?

Not at all. I do absorb but I don't need the belief that G-d is behind those words. If the words are wise, it doesn't matter if they come directly from G-d or not. I believe that the (Hebrew) Bible is the word of G-d (transmitted via human authors including Moses). But I also believe that studying those words because of who the ultimate author is shows disrespect to His abilities. It would mean accepting authority over wisdom.

If I were to become as smart as Einstein and published an essay about nuclear fusion, solving all related problems, I would like people to study the essay because the points I make are valid, not because of my authority (if I had any).

Similarly I believe people should study Torah because of the wisdom it contains, not because it is the word of G-d.

Belief in G-d is faith, but the Torah is Jewish law and fact. Whether the author is ultimately G-d I cannot say. But the wisdom in it does not depend on faith in a god. We can see the disadvantage of lawlessness everywhere around us.

Studying Torah because it is the word of G-d means ignoring out the reason G-d Himself gave to study it: the existence of the message is the reason to read and study the message. It it weren't, there would be no message; and G-d could have just forced upon us an inability to disbelieve.

 

on Dec 16, 2008

I don't think it would be as one would assume the prohibition on fire-building at the time these laws were written was based on the amount of labor that went in to creating and maintaining a fire. 

Very wise and very probably true.

Note that maintaining a fire does not necessarily fall under the prohibition. There is a (small) Jewish sect (the Karaites) who believe that even making use of a fire on Shabbath is against G-d's law. They sit in the cold on Saturday.

 

Then again, there is some academic argument which addresses the fact that some Jews believe they are simply forbidden to WORK (or labor) on Shabbat, while others see the prohibition upon CREATION of any sort.

The word used is "malaakha" which translates as "work" but is really the feminine second object noun of a root that means "to send (a message containing an order)". The masculine version ("malaakh") means "angel" (i.e. "messenger"). The root (now lost as a word) for "send (a message containing an order") is Lamed Alef Kaf.

There is a Yiddish word "malokhen" which described hard work for money.

I read the prohibition as prohibiting creative and productive work that one gets paid for. On Shabbath we are supposed to taste the world to come and not do work for other people.

And I think that the law interpreted like that makes a lot of sense.

 

on Dec 16, 2008

Note that maintaining a fire does not necessarily fall under the prohibition. There is a (small) Jewish sect (the Karaites) who believe that even making use of a fire on Shabbath is against G-d's law. They sit in the cold on Saturday.

I take it these sects restrict themselves to warmer climates?

If I were to try that where I live, my pipes would be busted!

on Dec 16, 2008

I take it these sects restrict themselves to warmer climates?

If I were to try that where I live, my pipes would be busted!

They live in Israel and California.

Always wondered how nightfall-related laws work near the north pole.

 

on Dec 16, 2008

Leuki posts:

Why would you paste from MS Word?

Seems awfully complicated to me. I type either in the in the comment box or in Notepad/TextEdit.app (fast and guaranteed text only).

KFC posts:

that's what I was thinking. I usually just type in the comment box as well. Too bothersome to transfer from anything else.

I will sometimes type in Word because it is easier for me to organize my response.  Having a spell check (yes I know firefox does this too but for some reason hasn't been reliable), and also grammar check sometimes comes in handy.  Secondly if I am responded to multiple comments on separate pages this allows me to navigate the forum without losing what I previously typed. 

My apologies for the inconveniences!

on Dec 16, 2008

Unless, of course, we're speaking of the sparks of creation which are to be returned to the Shekinah on Saturday nights, while playing hide-the-weenie with the Mrs. (After thee hours of begging and a trip to Bloomingdales...also known as Jewish Foreplay.

 

LOL! Its enough to make you want to convert, right?

 

I am impressed with your kabbalist approach here, Sabrina.  I also agree that there is an argument to be made regards creative work v. manual labor or labor for pay.  Some modern Orthodox are, I think, coming to this and most Conservative movement Jews.  Us Reform Jews are out there anyway.

 

Here's the thing about those divine sparks:  everytime you do something kind for another, everytime you perform a "mitzvah", everytime you do something to make the world a better place, a shard returns to God.  It is said that in this way we are God's partners in healing the world.

 

Be well.

on Dec 16, 2008

While you have come a long ways from the CC's position you are still stuck in a Greek mindset and not the Hebraic mindset of the Scriptures. This includes the Greek Jesus that corresponds with the replacement theology we see today.

It is really sad that Christians reject the Torah and their forefathers of Faith (ie Biblical Judaism). In doing so you are also rejecting the blessing that are apart of that covenant (not to be confused with the covenant of Salvation).

"Greek Jesus"? Our Lord Jesus Christ was a Jew.

Does this have something to do with the fact that it was the Greek Septuagint that was used by the Jews of Alexandria, Asia Minor, Greece, Italy, as well as by the Rabbis of Palestine at the time of the coming of Christ?

The Greek Septuagint mindset IS the Hebraic mindset of the Scriptures...and that's the one the Infant Chruch used then and Catholics still use today.  

You say it's sad that Christians reject the Torah and Biblical Judaism....This isn't true of Catholics and Catholicism. We fully accept the Torah as the inspired Word of God and understand Hebraic "Biblical" Judaism for what it was.. a gradual unfolding of God's true religion----- by sending Moses the lawgiver, and after him a series of prophets to explain the law and to perophecy the coming of the Messias. Christ, not Greek, but a Jew fulfilled these prophecies to a "T" and taught the perfect law of God. Hebraic Judaism before Christ was imperfect and preparatory-----that found its perfect fulfillment in the religion of Christ, Christianity. 

 

 

on Dec 16, 2008

The Greek Septuagint mindset IS the Hebraic mindset of the Scriptures...and that's the one the Infant Chruch used then and Catholics still use today.

 

This is simply not true.  Many Jews became Hellenized, that is, they spoke Greek, read Greek, so the Greek translation of the Torah was popular, just as the English translation is used in English countries, the Spanish in Spanish countries, and the German in Germany.  At the time, there was a real struggle to not become Hellenized.  Ptolemy was a bit more tolerant than the Selucid empires and ordered the Torah translated into Greek.  But in general Greek styles were either rewarded or Jewish celebrations and folkways followed with sentances of death, under Antiochus, for example. Josephus documents the pervasiveness of Greek influence.  But not everyone thought this was a good thing.  Jews were straying from the Torah.  The Maccabees rose up in revolt. And they restored the Jewish monarchy, unfortunately with one of their own rather than through the house of David.  

The very fact that there was such a massive revolt speaks volumes against the notion that the Septaugint is any sort of Hebrew mindset. 

 

Be well. 

on Dec 16, 2008

This is simply not true. Many Jews became Hellenized, that is, they spoke Greek, read Greek, so the Greek translation of the Torah was popular, just as the English translation is used in English countries, the Spanish in Spanish countries, and the German in Germany. At the time, there was a real struggle to not become Hellenized. Ptolemy was a bit more tolerant than the Selucid empires and ordered the Torah translated into Greek. But in general Greek styles were either rewarded or Jewish celebrations and folkways followed with sentances of death, under Antiochus, for example. Josephus documents the pervasiveness of Greek influence. But not everyone thought this was a good thing. Jews were straying from the Torah. The Maccabees rose up in revolt. And they restored the Jewish monarchy, unfortunately with one of their own rather than through the house of David.

The very fact that there was such a massive revolt speaks volumes against the notion that the Septaugint is any sort of Hebrew mindset.

You said this much better than I would of.

on Dec 16, 2008

LULA POSTS:

The Greek Septuagint mindset IS the Hebraic mindset of the Scriptures...and that's the one the Infant Chruch used then and Catholics still use today.


sODAIHO POSTS:
This is simply not true. Many Jews became Hellenized, that is, they spoke Greek, read Greek, so the Greek translation of the Torah was popular, just as the English translation is used in English countries, the Spanish in Spanish countries, and the German in Germany. At the time, there was a real struggle to not become Hellenized. Ptolemy was a bit more tolerant than the Selucid empires and ordered the Torah translated into Greek. But in general Greek styles were either rewarded or Jewish celebrations and folkways followed with sentances of death, under Antiochus, for example. Josephus documents the pervasiveness of Greek influence. But not everyone thought this was a good thing. Jews were straying from the Torah. The Maccabees rose up in revolt. And they restored the Jewish monarchy, unfortunately with one of their own rather than through the house of David.

The very fact that there was such a massive revolt speaks volumes against the notion that the Septaugint is any sort of Hebrew mindset.

SODAIHO AND AD,

What I said is true and if you'll study it further you'll find there are reasons for things.

The original Old Testament Scripture was written in Hebrew and by the year 285 BC. when the Septuagint was commissioned, Hebrew was on the decline, all but a dead language. Hebrew wasn't spoken and hardly known by the Jews outside of Palestine. During the days of the second Temple, Aramaic was the language spoken by them and a translator stood beside the reader in the Synagogue to translate the Hebrew into Aramaic.  

In Greek was the world language when the Septuagint translation was made. Septuagint means 70 and 70 translators, learned in Hebrew were sent to Alexandria by the Jewish High Priest Eleaser of Jerusalem at Ptolemy Philadelphus behest to translate into Greek all 46 Books of inspired Hebrew text then extant.  

According to Philo and Josephus' writings which I find amazing is the 70 translators worked independently and without consulting each other, the translations were all found to be exactly alike.    

As I said, the Septuagint was made in the 3rd century before Christ and was used and accepted by the Jews everywhere. All this time, they had no problems with it whatsoever never questioned its authenticity and integrity. The Septuagint enabled the knowledge of the OLd Law and its Divine prophecies to be spread among the Jews and the Gentiles who didn't know the Hebrew language. It is in this sense of the Septuagint's historic standing that I say the Greek Septuagint mindset is the Hebraic mindset of the Scriptures.

So, all was well with the Jews using the Septuagint until after the Messias came into His own and the early Christian Chruch adopted it, and that's when some of the Jews began to denounce it.

.... The Maccabees rose up in revolt. And they restored the Jewish monarchy, unfortunately with one of their own rather than through the house of David.

The very fact that there was such a massive revolt speaks volumes against the notion that the Septaugint is any sort of Hebrew mindset.

Here's something else to consider since you brought up the Machabees and we are discussing the connection btween the Septuagint and the Hebrew mindset.

As you must know, Chanukah, the Feasts of Lights, centers in the story of the Machabees which is the last 2 books of the Septuagint. Chanukah was instituted by Judas Machagees as a memorial of the re-dedication of the sanctuary which was defiled by Antiochus Epiphanes. The Machabees were martyrs for Hebraic Judaism. 

 

 

18 PagesFirst 13 14 15 16 17  Last