America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
She gives sellouts a bad name
Published on April 5, 2007 By Moderateman In War on Terror

Besides her being a SanFranfreako Liberal, she managed to sell out not only America on her latest jaunt to the middle East, but managed to sellout Israel at the same time. This is just another demonstration of a politician {a couple of Republicans too} doing their best to not only marginalize President Bush, but to lend some credence to a country that is a known sponsor of terrorism {Hamas and Hezbollah come to mind}.

Is there no low the Democrats will stoop to to capture the White house in 2008?

I must admit there strategy is flawless so far, do nothing in congress except try to continue to Bash Bush, put his aids on trial for nothing, No law was broke dismissing the eight attorneys, they serve at the pleasure of the President, meaning he can fire them if his hair did not look right one morning, I find it amazing that no one said a word when Wild bill fired 92 Attorneys, where was big mouth Chuckie Shumer then? Where was Harry Reid calling for criminal investigations then?

I have not been watching much news as it just aggravates me to much, but this latest slap in the face to America by Pelosi was just to much for me to not say something.

Pelosi is speaker of the House, not an international diplomat, she carries no authority to do anything, she cannot make any agreements with any country. This was just one big Photo opportunity for Pelosi and she made the most of it, damn the fact she screwed Israel by telling a huge lie, Israel told her nothing about any peace overtures with Syria, yet there she was speaking not just for America, but for another country. Could it be Pelosi is not satisfied with being just the speaker of the House of representatives? but is seeking a higher office as Speaker for the entire world?


Comments (Page 1)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Apr 05, 2007
Now here's my Elie! Glad to see ya back and raving, bro!   
on Apr 05, 2007
I don't understand how (or why) members of CONGRESS are making these diplomatic trips. What right does she have to speak for me? I never had the opportunity to not vote for her, so why does she get to go speak in my place?

This goes for any member of congress. Who paid for her trip? Was it the poor saps in her district? Or was it America? No congressman/woman should be making these diplomatic trips. None....
on Apr 05, 2007
Could it be Pelosi is not satisfied with being just the speaker of the House of representatives? but is seeking a higher office as Speaker for the entire world?


Maybe, just maybe she's the anti-christ...heh.

One of the nation's leading experts on Islam says (Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch) he believes Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is going to be "unpleasantly surprised" when she discovers that you can not negotiate with countries that harbor terrorists.

No congressman/woman should be making these diplomatic trips. None....


ya, I mean what authority does she have? None. She can't set policies. Does she think she is going to "save the day?"

The Dems still believe that if they give the right combination of concessions to various Islamic states and majority Muslim countries, they will find there will be peace -- and I think they're going to be unpleasantly surprised. Geeeesh I'm starting to think we're going to go back to giving "tributes" to these folks just like the "good ol' days."
on Apr 05, 2007
(Citizen)ShovelheatApril 5, 2007 17:57:57


Now here's my Elie! Glad to see ya back and raving, bro!


took to much out of me joe to do this again any time soon.

it's like my internal batteries are just charged enough to keep vital things moving and if I use energy for crap like this I just take away from me.
on Apr 05, 2007
(Citizen)MythicalMinoApril 5, 2007 18:15:52


I don't understand how (or why) members of CONGRESS are making these diplomatic trips. What right does she have to speak for me? I never had the opportunity to not vote for her, so why does she get to go speak in my place?

This goes for any member of congress. Who paid for her trip? Was it the poor saps in her district? Or was it America? No congressman/woman should be making these diplomatic trips. None....


My thoughts exactly, what makes it worse to me is she is the third most powerful person in Washington, if the president and vice-president get it in the neck she is the President of the United States.
on Apr 05, 2007
(Citizen)KFC Kickin For ChristApril 5, 2007 18:53:24


Maybe, just maybe she's the anti-christ...heh.


Now there is a scary thought.

ya, I mean what authority does she have? None. She can't set policies. Does she think she is going to "save the day?"


She cannot set anything such as treaties, open up negotiations between Syria and America, in other words she went to piss on America and the Presidency.
on Apr 05, 2007

Excellant!  Just damn excellant!

You have nailed it.  But dont expect any recognition from the left.  Sad really.  How many enemies did Newt pay homage to - and don a burka to do it?

(I know I am going to get crap for that Burka thing - but what the hey!).

on Apr 05, 2007
a) why not a word about he republicans who went to syria?
since when is an isreali politician the "voice of God?" the isreali prime minister is a politician too, remember... our politicians lie 100% of the time and theirs are honest 100% of the time? i don't think so.
on Apr 05, 2007

 

a) why not a word about he republicans who went to syria?

How many are speaker of the House? How many wore head coverings?

since when is an isreali politician the "voice of God?" the isreali prime minister is a politician too, remember... our politicians lie 100% of the time and theirs are honest 100% of the time? i don't think so.

Since when did anyone proclaim them such?

on Apr 05, 2007
(Citizen)Dr GuyApril 5, 2007 19:01:59Reply


Excellant! Just damn excellant!
You have nailed it. But dont expect any recognition from the left.


thank you doc, and I don't expect anything from the left but excuses or things like "how come you did not write an article about republicans that did it."
on Apr 05, 2007
(Citizen)Sean Conners aka SConn1April 5, 2007 19:02:24


a) why not a word about he republicans who went to syria?


I rest my case.. see above.. I have not been writing at all in case you have not noticed sean.

since when is an isreali politician the "voice of God?" the isreali prime minister is a politician too, remember... our politicians lie 100% of the time and theirs are honest 100% of the time? i don't think so.


Israel has been pretty steady about no chance for peace as long as {insert country} is sponsering terrorism.

on Apr 05, 2007
I dunno how I feel about it right now . . .

Mostly I just see someone trying to exhaust all venues to deal with a country before we do anything hasty. You know, that Weinberger Doctrine being what it is, after all . . .
on Apr 05, 2007
(Citizen)SanChoninoApril 5, 2007 19:43:04


I dunno how I feel about it right now . . .

Mostly I just see someone trying to exhaust all venues to deal with a country before we do anything hasty. You know, that Weinberger Doctrine being what it is, after all . . .


There is little or no chance there will be conflict with Syria. Besides Pelosi has no authority to do anything about anything concerning anything with another country in the first place, she has the same clout as Me going to Syria and talking to the President of Syria.
on Apr 05, 2007

Since when did anyone proclaim them such?


the assumption that she must be lying and the prime minister is being honest.

I rest my case.. see above.. I have not been writing at all in case you have not noticed sean.


yeah, pretty convenient to say that after i asked the question. i guess the real answer is that you are just interested in attacking democrats. act is tht somebody has to talk to those people, but as long as condi and the state dept are being whining lil girls about "talking to our enemies" as if that's a new and radical concept, i applaud both the republicans and democrats that have attempted to talk to syria in whatever capacity availible. be it official or non official. if you notice, i didn't ask about why you didn't criticize them, but i asked why no mention?

if you think that no one should ever go to speak to anyone from a foreign governmnet, then that's sine,,,just say so. i personally applaud both reps. and dems. for taking some sort of initiative.

but if you don't, at least be fair.

one nore note,,,i'm at a loss here...could someone point out to me in the Constitution where it says that no one except people in the seperate but equal part of the executive branch can speak to members of a foreign government?


on Apr 05, 2007
Did anyone stop to think that Bush probably asked her to go and also told her that he would attack her in the media because he had to?

The reason? Because by her going to Syria, Bush doesn't have to talk to either Iran or Syria officially but could convey a message to both Syria and Iran what would happen if the British soldiers were not released.

It isn't coincidence that she went, and the soldiers were released. Syria even admitted that they were partially responsible.

So traitor? No. Quietly doing her job as asked of her by Bush? Yes.
3 Pages1 2 3