America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
How can they BOTH be normal?
Published on September 15, 2006 By Moderateman In US Domestic

 

Since this article has engendered such passionate responces I have deleted the parts that were misinformation or misleading. Hopefully this corrected version will now open up more debate.

For the last 40 or so years homosexual activists have been striving to achieve not just acceptance, but

 complete infiltration into every nook and cranny of American life.

Their way of living, they claim is just another "healthy" variation of human sexuality.

Lets look at their intrusion into schools, especially kindergarten through the 12th grade in public schools. through a deliberate plan of intimidation and propaganda they have infiltrated their way into revising history and other subjects of learning.

These activist have been very successful in Massachusetts and to a lessor degree California, Massachusetts being the only state in the union to allow homosexual marriage.

Right now in the California legislature there are three bills dealing with homosexuals.

SB1437 which demands that history and social studies be re-written to include contributions of homosexual, bisexual and trans-gender people. This will cost the state many millions of dollars to change the books involved, although I fail to see what a persons sexual preferences have to do with contributions made to anything. {sb1437 is correct, books will have to be rewritten to comply if this bill passes and will cost the state of California millions}

SOME LIBERAL TEACHERS HAVE DECIDED THE MICHELANGELO was a homosexual and are teaching this in class with no proof that he was indeed homosexual. This of course is taking place in some California schools.

Doctor Joseph Nicolosi and Elizabeth Saewyc, who is the research director for the University of British Columbia has found that the suicide among homosexuals is considerably higher that Heterosexuals.

28.4 percent of a 30,000 group study of homosexuals have tried to commit suicide against 8.2 percent of a group of 30,000 heterosexuals. With figures like this how can homosexuality be considered healthy or normal?

In closing I would like to point out my opinion. To me there is nothing normal about two men having sex and being married, same with two women. Homosexuals should not be allowed to adopt children and bring them into what I see is an abnormal environment.


Comments (Page 2)
5 Pages1 2 3 4  Last
on Sep 15, 2006
NOT VOCALLY ACKNOWLEDGING


someones "cocked up" hehehehe

sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *looks embarrassed*
on Sep 15, 2006
I demand special treatment!!

I was born colorblind & left-handed. I get sunburns easily and (because of a congenital "kink" in my espophagus) I have to drink a lot of beverage when I eat! I demand all of you change to make it so I don't have to notice that I may be different! Color coding is Color Discrimination! Anyone who doesn't agree with everything I saw is just a redneck hate-monger and chromosinistocrimsondermokinkyesophogusphobe!!
on Sep 15, 2006
chromosinistocrimsondermokinkyesophogusphobe!!


take a breath now ! hehehehhehe a deep one!
on Sep 15, 2006
Chromosinistosologeniccrimsondermokinkyesophogusphobe!! !!

And I bet you thought I made it up! :~D
on Sep 15, 2006
you still gotta take a deeeeeeeeeep breath after trying to say it!
on Sep 15, 2006
IF this goes through in November I am going to demand that my full title be used by any and all people/ I will be known as Elie, heterosexual male of Turkish descent that practices Judaism.
on Sep 15, 2006
IF this goes through in November I am going to demand that my full title be used by any and all people/ I will be known as Elie, heterosexual male of Turkish descent that practices Judaism.


And I'll be known as Shaun, heterosexual male of Italian descent who is Christian, but rarely practices.

~Zoo
on Sep 15, 2006
(Citizen)adnauseamSeptember 15, 2006 15:38:38


don't want to open a can of worms but I am against homosexuality because it is unnatural. Gays can throw bricks through my window if they like but there is no getting away from the fact that man was built by God for woman. Man was made to co-habit with woman and produce offspring. Man was not meant to sleep with man. That's base I know, but that is what goes on. I like a lot of gay people but I can't stop wondering how they would want to sleep with another man. I am not knocking them--it just seems unnatural to me because certain orifices in the body are meant for certain functions and I cringe at the thought that the function can change. Base, as I said, but I'm old-fashioned.


I guess I am old fashioned too then, the idea of plowing up into a man just makes me wanna barf.
on Sep 16, 2006
And you wonder why I don't participate much here anymore? - Little-Whip

Some of us have been wondering...
on Sep 16, 2006
have always said that gay people are chemically imbalanced which results in them being gay.... also resulting in the higher suicidal rate, eg. Depression is understood to be a chemical imbalance in a large amount of cases if not all, fix the chemical imbalance - you generally fix the problem. Can this be done with gay people, has it been investigated?


Whilst the above may be politically incorrect to state, it does not constitute gay bashing. I suffer with depression and have done for nigh on 18 years and am treated successfully (i like to think so at least) with chemicals. Depression, suicide and gay orientation appear to be closely linked, the question is a valid one.

I am not inferring they are "mentally ill". The term mentally ill conjures up all sorts of things, psychopaths, scizoids etc. Gay people are not any of those (some may be, as some hetros may be)

My question is has anyone looked into the possiblitiy of chemical imbalances, quite simply because gayness seems to be on the increase in very big numbers, there has to be scientific reasons for this - not just sexual preference.

The male and female bodies human (not only human, the animal kingdom too) were created in pairs by nature for procreation, they obviously fit together for very good reasons. Gayness goes against the natural order of what nature intended.

on Sep 16, 2006

Reply By: little-whipPosted: Saturday, September 16, 2006
Yanno what, folks, I was hoping to see an actual discussion of the bill here, along with some legitimate reasons as to why it's not a good idea. There are many.

Instead, its turned into a moronic gay-bashing fest, complete with biblical references, the notion that gays are mentally ill, and descriptions of where penii were meant to fit and gross-outs over the possibility of 'plowing up into a man.'

Grow the fuck up, all of you.

And you wonder why I don't participate much here anymore?

Instead of a discourse on how immature we all are, you could have choosen to start a rational discourse yourself.

on Sep 16, 2006
I guess I've become a liberal myself (on this topic anyway). While I don't necessarily agree with gay marriage and I guess I don't see homosexuality as being "right," why shouldn't gay people be able to live their lives as we do without all of THIS?

We have all these theories about what "causes" gayness. Does it matter where it comes from? Does it matter if a gay person's chemicals are "imbalanced"? I don't think it does, because it's irrelevant. If you want to bring God into this equation...God made gay people, too. He may not have made them gay, but he created a gay person as much as He created a straight person. And I believe that God doesn't make mistakes.

AB606 requires school districts to have discrimination and harassment policies and WILL PUNISH ANY STUDENT NOT CONFORMING.


Homosexuals are a protected class of people. If you can't discriminate against me based on my gender, my religion, my race, etc., why should you be allowed to discriminate against me or harass me because I'm gay? I personally would support this measure wholeheartedly. Doesn't this relate to a zero tolerance policy? What it comes down to is basically "Don't be an asshole". Or...in elementary terms, "Be respectful".

The other two measures to me seem a bit over the top. I don't feel I should have to say "Hello Mr. Smith. I'm so glad to see that you're heterosexual today" to a coworker, or "Good morning, Sue who is gay. How was your weekend?" Who cares?

Furthermore, in regards to the rewriting of texts and such to include gay leaders...what difference does it make if a person is gay or not? What if there were no major gay leaders out there to be included? Would we have to make one up so that the text would be inclusive of all? History should be written like it is, not skewed to focus on things that aren't really important.

Now...if you wanted to include something about the gay rights movement, etc., and the struggles all sorts of people, including racial minorities, have had to go through to be considered equal in this country, I believe THAT would be something noteworthy to include in a HIGH SCHOOL level text. These things of a sexual nature don't have a place in an elementary classroom--that should be taken care of in the home.
on Sep 16, 2006
I have always said that gay people are chemically imbalanced which results in them being gay.... also resulting in the higher suicidal rate, eg. Depression is understood to be a chemical imbalance in a large amount of cases if not all, fix the chemical imbalance - you generally fix the problem. Can this be done with gay people, has it been investigated?


I don't know that there's one "road to homosexuality". It might be a chemical thing, it might be related to a particularly troublesome (or good, I guess) with someone of the same sex, or it might be a choice for some people.

I think being homosexual has it's repercussions, but I don't think it should be treated as an illness. It's not being treated that way any longer in the mental health field, and I don't think the rest of us should either.
on Sep 16, 2006
think being homosexual has it's repercussions, but I don't think it should be treated as an illness. It's not being treated that way any longer in the mental health field, and I don't think the rest of us should either.


What I am saying is - have they even investigated the possibility

What if it is chemical imbalance?

What if the chemical imbalance could be put in balance again with a little itty bitty tablet?

It would of course be a choice to seek medical help to have the imbalance sorted out.

I have since done an internet search on the subject and have posted it on Science and technology here on the forum titled "Gay - chemical imbalance?". Take a look and read through the various links and draw your own conclusions
on Sep 16, 2006
What if being heterosexual is a "chemical imbalance"? What if they could make you gay with a "little itty bitty tablet"?

And if that doesn't work, maybe some kind of gene or radiation therapy. Or cosmic rays. Maybe prayer.

And I assume, as long as the homos are taking their pills or praying away the gay, you'd all be fine with them adopting and raising kids in that "normal" environment.

If the contributors to this thread are examples of the product of this supposed ideal child rearing environment, then we're in trouble. Of course, it is unlikely that all these people come from that ideal family.

After all. Most families have maybe a grandparent. How should we legislate grandparents living with families. Two adult dudes in the same house, contributing to the upbringing of a child (and one insists on being called "Sir"!)? Sounds like a sin to me.

Or what if you grew up in a fmaily where one parent had a child from another marraige. Or even from out of wedlock. Somebody tell me how we'll word the law that bans this obviously less than perfect situation - stepchildren and stepsiblings only lead to trouble. It's in the Book.

Well it has been fun. Let me know next time you make up a news story just to get huffed up about it.

5 Pages1 2 3 4  Last