The C.O.L. must have been a bit brokeback in a past life, given his hatred of all things BUSH.

*GROAN*

#12 by little-whip Thursday, May 04, 2006 Haha, Preach it, bro! nuttin like gettin an old street thug annoyed huh? Colleen said " oh my you kiss me with that mouth?" heh

You know something Elie? "My" wife says the SAME damn thing! Now ain't that a kick in the pants?

FFor ANYONE to say the lives of our military do not matter is disgusting. I served my country and did what I was told. I had no part in being assigned as a nuclear weapons officer which then prevented my assignment to a combat assignment. I did not hide out in the National Guard during Vietnam like Bush I was Regular Army.

The responsibility I had as a nuclear weapons officer was daunting and I will bet dwarfed what most if not all of you did in the military. That was NOT a game is DEADLY serious.

You are the cowards to support a policy that sent our military into combat WHEN our country was not in danger. Neither the American People nor Congress was told that reason for invading Iraq was to give the Iraqi People the right to Vote. If Bash had given that reason to invade Iraq the answer would have been NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He manipulated the intelligence to make it appear we were in danger when that was NOT the case. That has cost 2,407 lives and over 18,000 combat injuries. It will most like also result in up to a Trillion dollars that would better have been used to meet the many NEEDS of Americans!

I do no not hate Bush I hate what he as done to our country!

For ANYONE to say the lives of our military do not matter is disgusting. I served my country and did what I was told. I had no part in being assigned as a nuclear weapons officer which then prevented my assignment to a combat assignment. I did not hide out in the National Guard during Vietnam like Bush I was Regular Army.

The responsibility I had as a nuclear weapons officer was daunting and I will bet dwarfed what most if not all of you did in the military. That was NOT a game it was DEADLY serious.

You are the cowards to support a policy that sent our military into combat WHEN our country was not in danger. Neither the American People nor Congress was told that reason for invading Iraq was to give the Iraqi People the right to Vote. If Bash had given that reason to invade Iraq the answer would have been NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He manipulated the intelligence to make it appear we were in danger when that was NOT the case. That has cost 2,407 lives and over 18,000 combat injuries. It will most like also result in up to a Trillion dollars that would better have been used to meet the many NEEDS of Americans!

I do no not hate Bush I hate what he as done to our country!

Our country wasn't in danger in WW2. The Japanese offered us conditions outright that stated that if we gave up our interests in the Pacific that they had no interest in a conflict with us. We were in no danger in WW1. Most people, though, are intelligent enough to see that our interests extend past our borders.

You are that smart, col, you're just a hypocrite.

Japan had the capability to attack us as proven by Dec 7th. Our being in the Pacific was no reason to attack the United States.

Saddam had NO ability to attack the United States. The military assessment was that he could ONLY operate in the central section of Iraq. He had NO capability to attack the United States or for that matter any other country in March 2003.

The Intelligence also showed that he had NO Nuclear program and thus the mushroom clouds Bush, Cheney and Rummy said were a danger to our country was a LIE! Even if Saddam had some old gas filled artillery shells he could only have used then against us IF WE INVADED. There was NO danger from Saddam to the United States, there was no connection to 9/11 and the justification Bush used to invade Iraq was a FLAT OUT LIE!

Japan had the capability to attack us as proven by Dec 7th. Our being in the Pacific was no reason to attack the United States. Saddam had NO ability to attack the United States. The military assessment was that he could ONLY operate in the central section of Iraq. He had NO capability to attack the United States or for that matter any other country in March 2003. The Intelligence also showed that he had NO Nuclear program and thus the mushroom clouds Bush, Cheney and Rummy said were a danger to our country was a LIE! Even if Saddam had some old gas filled artillery shells he could only have used then against us IF WE INVADED. There was NO danger from Saddam to the United States, there was no connection to 9/11 and the justification Bush used to invade Iraq was a FLAT OUT LIE!

So now you're a clown and a fool. It has been shown over and over that Saddam had "more" than just some old gas filled artillary shells. You just keep on believing the BS the media is feeding you. There were no WMD's, there were no ties to 9/11, etc....When "every" soldier that comes back says different. Also like they said that Saddam had no yellowcake.....more BS:

Physicist: Saddam's Uranium Stockpile Enough to Yield 142 Nukes Five hundred tons of yellowcake uranium ore stored at Saddam Hussein's al Tuwaitha nuclear weapons research laboratory near Baghdad could have been enriched to produce 142 nuclear weapons, a prominent British physicist has determined. Addressing the claim by British intelligence last year that Iraq had sought uranium in Niger, Norman Dombey, professor of theoretical physics at the University of Sussex, argued, "Iraq already had far more uranium than it needed for any conceivable nuclear weapons programme." In an op-ed piece for London's Evening Standard, Professor Dombey explained that standard yellowcake ore consists of 99 percent Uranium 238 [U238], "which is radioactive but is not used in normal nuclear weapons as it cannot sustain a chain reaction." To cause a nuclear chain reaction, he noted, "you need U235, which only makes up less than 1 percent [0.7] of natural uranium." After doing the calculations, Professor Dombey explained, "You have a warehouse containing 500 tons of natural uranium; you need 25 kilograms of U235 to build one weapon. How many nuclear weapons can you build? "The answer is 142." Though most reporters continue to insist that Iraq had abandoned its nuclear weapons program after the first Gulf War, chief U.S. weapons inspector Charles Duelfer told Congress earlier this year that the Iraqi scientists were "preserving and expanding [their] knowledge to design and develop nuclear weapons." One laboratory at al Tuwaitha "was intentionally focused on research applicable for nuclear weapons development," the top weapons inspector revealed. Iraq War critics have argued that Saddam's uranium stockpile was safe because it was subject to once-a-year inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency. But the IAEA was also in charge of monitoring North Korea's nuclear program right up until 2002, when Pyongyang announced it would begin producing nuclear weapons.

Where is all this WMD?

The proof is that Saddam did not have ANY ability to attack this country in March 2003. He had No Nuclear Program and now we know he did not have the other WMD that some claimed he had ready to use against us. You are so full of BS it comes out of every orifice in your body!

The proof is

Actually, no has been able to, without a shadow of a doubt, prove that Saddam did or did not have WMD or a Nuclear Program. So you need to take that tiny little brain of yours and put it back in your military memory trunk together with all those things you have to remember about "the good old days". It's outdated, useless and non-replaceable. You don't even have an opinion or idea of your own. You spend too much time flipping thru the MSM networks and searching the internet looking for anything that can add more meat to your book. Cause we all know this is all a publicity stunt for your next book. In the end it's all about the money with you Col.

You ever wonder why you're never banned on anyones articles? Cause you perfect for target practice, we love having nuts like you talk your head off so we can prove that their are still plenty of nuts to go around on this planet.

Shame on you for having such a low value feeling towards those soldiers who are giving their lives to do what they are asked to. You were not chosen to be their spokesman so you have no right to say that they died for nothing. It is they who chose whether they died for something or nothing.

Reply By: San ChoninoPosted: Thursday, May 04, 2006Hahahahahahahahaha! I think I enjoyed reading these comments more than any others of a "politically charged" nature, guys . . . I must admit, there are some tempers running tonight . . . But I think you make a good point, MM. I don't agree with you often - but I agree with the Colonel even less often. And you are right in this instance, I would say . . .

disagreement is good and mekes agrement that much better when it happens. thank you.

Someone really has to go OUT OF THERE WAY to annoy me, otherwise I ama just a big pusycat.

Reply By: terpfan1980Posted: Thursday, May 04, 2006The C.O.L. must have been a bit brokeback in a past life, given his hatred of all things BUSH

I am pretty sure that the don't ask don't tell policy saved his career, but he left before he made general.

[

Reply By: drmilerPosted: Friday, May 05, 2006#12 by little-whip Thursday, May 04, 2006 Haha, Preach it, bro!nuttin like gettin an old street thug annoyed huh? Colleen said " oh my you kiss me with that mouth?" hehYou know something Elie? "My" wife says the SAME damn thing! Now ain't that a kick in the pants?

well john shows you old nasty mouth men get the BEST WOMEN!

Reply By: COL GenePosted: Friday, May 05, 2006For ANYONE to say the lives of our military do not matter is disgusting.

you demean our troops everytime you say " died for no good reason"

Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Thursday, May 04, 2006Gene is the coward that died 1000 deaths

he dies daily his own vile poison generated from inside must eat him.

No it is Bush who committed our troops into a WAR that did not have to be. Saddam was not able to do anything to the United States and that was clearly the military assessment prior to our invasion. Even if Saddam would have had some of the WMD he had NO way to use it against the United States!

I would ONLY risk the lives our troops to PROTECT our country. That was NOT the case in March 2003 and Bush was told that but ignored the facts. The two FORMER CIA Section Chiefs have come forward with that information as well as Gen. Zinni and LTG Trainer. If Bush had told Congress and the American People he was sending our troops into a war so the Iraq people could select a new government, he would NEVER have gotten Congress to approve this war and anyone that says any different is a LIER!

Bush sent our military to their death and injury against a danger that not only DID NOT EXIST but one that he was told DID NOT EXIST. Anyone that defends his actions is a guilty of sending our military into harms way without a just reason as Bush!