You disappoint me President Bush

President Hu Jintao of China standing with Bush makes me sick

Published on April 20, 2006 By Moderateman In US Domestic

President Bush, how could you? Just standing with President Hu Jintao of China basically co-signs some of the worse human degradation on the planet.

Jails abound with people speaking their minds.

Forced abortion is the order of the day.

Child slave workers are becoming the norm in China!

People just suddenly disappear into the void, never to be seen or heard from again.

Censorship of news and common reading material is ENFORCED!

There is a huge trade deficit with China, as we keep buying more and more cheap Chinese goods and they have not even begun to buy from us what they promised when we granted them favored nation status.

How can you begin to even invite him to the center of Democracy on the entire planet george?

You do not seem to understand that the Chinese want to bury america, either in debt or more lethal actions.

The Chinese obstruct every move we try to make through the United Nations.

The Chinese are our enemy President Bush and to watch you fawn over him makes me sorry I voted for you in 2004.

Comments (Page 1)

Dr Guy

on Apr 20, 2006

Who would you have voted for? IN reality, Politics is politics.

bakerstreet

on Apr 20, 2006

It sickens me. There hasn't been a President with a hardline stance against China in decades. Not Republicans, not Democrats. We approve the sale of equipment they use to oppress their people, we try to make sure the pigs don't see protesters when they come here. The Senate pretends to have a problem with them and then gives them most favored trade status.

In the end they are a market of 1.3 billion people, and that is worth more to the people in charge of business and the government. The government in China won't last, though. Through reform or revolution it will change, and I wonder how those folks will look back on our coddling their taskmasters.

BlueDev

on Apr 20, 2006

I have to agree with you ModMan. The pandering just pisses me off.

Moderateman

on Apr 20, 2006

#1 by Dr. Guy
Thursday, April 20, 2006

Who would you have voted for? IN reality, Politics is politics.

I think I might have abstained doc, for sure I would have jabbed knitting needles in my eyes before I would have voted for the traitorous Hanoijohn

Moderateman

on Apr 20, 2006

#2 by BakerStreet
Thursday, April 20, 2006

sickens me too baker and it's 2.3 billion

Moderateman

on Apr 20, 2006

3 by BlueDev
Thursday, April 20, 2006

have to agree with you ModMan. The pandering just pisses me off.

how could he do that? geeze he could have done it in private. grrrrrrrrr

COL Gene

on Apr 20, 2006

I agree it was a sickening sight to see our President treating the President of China like a great leader.

cactoblasta

on Apr 20, 2006

Eh, it's politics. You'd have to be very lucky to find a politician who wouldn't make friends with a child-raping dictator if it served his purpose. They're all as bad as each other and it's got to the stage where there's barely a difference of degree as well.

Moderateman

on Apr 20, 2006

7 by COL Gene
Thursday, April 20, 2006

agree it was a sickening sight to see our President treating the President of China like a great leader.

yes this is two times in two days we have agreed on an issue...Now I am scared...lol

Moderateman

on Apr 20, 2006

8 by cactoblasta
Thursday, April 20, 2006

Eh, it's politics. You'd have to be very lucky to find a politician who wouldn't make friends with a child-raping dictator if it served his purpose. They're all as bad as each other and it's got to the stage where there's barely a difference of degree as well.

I must disagree it's not politics, it's down right pandering. disgusting. and yes it is getting to be that you can exchange one leader from one country to another and there is no real difference.

Insightful cacto!

cactoblasta

on Apr 20, 2006

it's down right pandering

Read Kautilya and you'll see that even back in pre-Roman days pandering was the name of the game. The only thing that changes in politics are the players, not the nature of the game.

Moderateman

on Apr 20, 2006

11 by cactoblasta
Thursday, April 20, 2006

it's down right pandering

Read Kautilya and you'll see that even back in pre-Roman days pandering was the name of the game. The only thing that changes in politics are the players, not the nature of the game.

pandering according to the law in new york city is a crime...living off the proceeds of a prostitute,, se any simularities between scum and politicians now?

Lee1776

on Apr 20, 2006

At least the b$%t*^d didn't get a free state dinner and only got a lunch enstead.

Maybe it was not a slight at all, but Bush trying to cut Governmental spending after all.

Moderateman

on Apr 20, 2006

13 by Lee1776
Thursday, April 20, 2006

At least the b$%t*^d didn't get a free state dinner and only got a lunch enstead.

Maybe it was not a slight at all, but Bush trying to cut Governmental spending after all.

good one!!! have a cookie on me.. lmao

dynamaso

on Apr 21, 2006

China has also been cited for allowing the trade in body parts. There was an article in the Sydney Morning Herald this week about them killing criminals for pre-ordered body parts.

John Howard is not much better, bending over and letting the Indonesian president tell him what to do. The whole lot of them are a sad, sorrow bunch, but as Cacto said, it doesn't surprise me. Besides, a photo opportunity is a photo opportunity...

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!