Disinformation-The Medias Forte!

Lies, Lies and more lies, accepted as truth.

Published on November 17, 2005 By Moderateman In The Media

I am sure we have all heard the Osama bin Laden is ill with a kidney disease and has at his disposal a dialysis machine .
Many Americans think this is the truth, but no one knows for sure.

Why does the media want us to believe this? Why would the media INTENTIONALLY MISLEAD AMERICA INTO THINKING THAT he is a very sick and dieing man? I believe it's because MOST of the media is against the war on terror and it appeals to their twisted senses to show that a 6 ft 6 ill man travels around with camels laden with all the equipment for dialysis, while eluding the most powerful nation on the planet and makes a fool of President Bush.

Right now this lie has been reported for at least seven years, long past the life expectancy of someone undergoing dialysis under the best of conditions, hospitalized and in sanitary conditions!

The MSM has elevated disinformation into a high art form, through the use of deliberate false hoods or partial facts in order to mislead or influence peoples thinking.. A book by Richard Miniter called Disinformation, 22 media myths that undermine the war on terror proves that many WMD"S have indeed been found in Iraq! including 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium, 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons, 17 chemical warheads filled with cyclosporin, A deadly nerve agent.

Also roadside bombs {ieds} have been found to contain mustard gas and sarin gas, yet most Americans believe that no WMD"S have been discovered in Iraq, this conclusion is a lie and it undermines The Presidents was on terror, supporting the lefts claim the Bush lied!.

Another set if lies reported by the MSM is America supported the Taliban in the 1980's, the truth is the Taliban was not even formed till 1995.

The antidote for the lies being spread by the Democrats and there allies the elite media can only be stopped by one way, get the truth out there and stop the propaganda being spread by the democrats, the msm and the enemies of our great nation.

I worked really hard on this article and spent a lot of time researching my FACTS. I also put spellcheck and grammar check to good use this time, so no one will trash my spelling and grammar while completely ignoring the truth of my article.

Comments (Page 1)

DJBandit

on Nov 17, 2005

I worked real hard on this article and spent a lot of time researching my FACTS. I also put spellcheck and grammar check to good use this time so no one will trash my spelling and grammar while completely ignoring the truth of my article.

I think your article was great, but since you mentioned this last line on it I feel the need to as if in the first sentence was it your intention to put "at his disposal" twice? Just curious.

Can't wait to see what will be posted to fight your proof. This will be good. Great Job.

Leauki

on Nov 17, 2005

He didn't post proof, just opinion. But I guess we can check the facts. I'll see if I can buy the book.

Moderateman

on Nov 17, 2005

Reply By: DJBanditPosted: Thursday, November 17, 2005I worked real hard on this article and spent a lot of time researching my FACTS. I also put spellcheck and grammar check to good use this time so no one will trash my spelling and grammar while completely ignoring the truth of my article. I think your article was great, but since you mentioned this last line on it I feel the need to as if in the first sentence was it your intention to put "at his disposal" twice? Just curious.Can't wait to see what will be posted to fight your proof. This will be good. Great Job.

thanx for the kodoes dj and I appreciate you gently correcting my boo boo. I fixed it.

Moderateman

on Nov 17, 2005

Reply By: Andrew J. BrehmPosted: Thursday, November 17, 2005He didn't post proof, just opinion. But I guess we can check the facts. I'll see if I can buy the book

I gave a source, I did a lot of work and I hope others will seek the truth on their own.

Moderateman

on Nov 17, 2005

Oh for crying out loud, where are are the leftwingers? where are the apoligies for calling Bush a liar? Where is the denials?

ParaTed2k

on Nov 17, 2005

It's simple Mod. The left doesn't care what the truth happens to be. They'll scream, rant and carry on like little brats over some supposed "lie" about WMDs, but won't give a crap about actual facts and proof (like this book, and the Able Danger evidence).

The press has become a parody of itself. Not only don't they care about facts, they won't even call out competitors in the press when the lies are found. So-called "reporters" sit around on their fat, lazy butts, taking their "stories" from the wires. Then pat each other on the back for being "hard hitting" and "digging up" the story.

If there was a single person in the press who still had any integrity, they would at least try to preserve the integrity and professionalism of the industry, but since there aren't any honest reporters left, I guess it won't happen.

Thanks for the heads up on the book.

Moderateman

on Nov 17, 2005

Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Thursday, November 17, 2005It's simple Mod. The left doesn't care what the truth happens to be. They'll scream, rant and carry on like little brats over some supposed "lie" about WMDs, but won't give a crap about actual facts and proof (like this book, and the Able Danger evidence).The press has become a parody of itself. Not only don't they care about facts, they won't even call out competitors in the press when the lies are found. So-called "reporters" sit around on their fat, lazy butts, taking their "stories" from the wires. Then pat each other on the back for being "hard hitting" and "digging up" the story.If there was a single person in the press who still had any integrity, they would at least try to preserve the integrity and professionalism of the industry, but since there aren't any honest reporters left, I guess it won't happen.Thanks for the heads up on the book.

and thank you for replying ted, seems that I have become some kind of leper here recently, all my articles have fallen flat on there face, even this one that I put so much time, care and investigation into.

Dr Guy

on Nov 17, 2005

Excellent article! Better than anything the NY times can do!

And you got to wonder about the Castro thing as well. "Sources at the CIA". Is the MSM outing the CIA now? Hmmmmmm.....or just doing a Jason Blair?????

shadesofgrey

on Nov 17, 2005

Moderateman:

Interesting article, though I am a bit skeptical about Miniter's book. I mean, if this was true, if they really did find WMD's wouldn't Bush and Blair be talking about it? Even if the media didn't cover the story, wouldn't there still be press releases and the whatnot sent out by the White House (and available at www.whitehouse.gov)? There aren't any, and I have a hard time believing that the President wouldn't hitch his wagon to this star if he thought it could save his butt and his reputation.

Another set if lies reported by the MSM is America supported the Taliban in the 1980's, the truth is the Taliban was not even formed till 1995.

I think that there is some confusion on this. I suppose both you and the media are correct, to a degree. The Taliban are one of the mujahideen(loosely translates to group of holy warriors) that formed in Afghanistan during the war against Soviet occupation. The war took place from 1979 until 1989. The Soviets eventually withdrew and the Soviet-back government in Afghanistan lost ground to the mujahideen. In 1992, Kabul was captured and an alliance of mujahideen set up a new government. But the alliance group members had trouble playing nicely with each other and Afghanistan was reduced to a collection of territories with competing warlords.

Various groups of taliban (or "religious students") were scattered throughout Afghanistan during the occupation and civil war. They were not organized and they didn't emerge as a united entity until 1994, when Pakistan chose a group of well-trained taliban to protect a convoy that was attempting to open a trade route from Pakistan to Central Asia. They were quite skilled, and were able to fight off other mujahideen and warlords. After this, the Taliban began a surprise attack by taking the city of Kandahar. It ended when they captured Kabul in September 1996.

So, my point in retelling this history is to say that yes, you are right, the Taliban was not a completely structured entity until 1994, however, there is no doubt that its precusor, the mujahideen were aided by the US in its struggle against the Soviet. It was still the Cold War where the enemy of your enemy is your friend. So, of course we were helping them.

Moderateman

on Nov 17, 2005

8 by Dr. Guy
Thursday, November 17, 2005

Excellent article! Better than anything the NY times can do!
And you got to wonder about the Castro thing as well. "Sources at the CIA". Is the MSM outing the CIA now? Hmmmmmm.....or just doing a Jason Blair?????

here is how it works if the right outs a dogcatcher its news, if the news outs the cia well that is ok\

Moderateman

on Nov 17, 2005

9 by shadesofgrey
Thursday, November 17, 2005

Moderateman:

Interesting article, though I am a bit skeptical about Miniter's book

of couse you are, how else could the left continue to demonize bush?

thank you for the history lesson, man I would sure love to sit face to face with you and discuss things, I could learn so much from you.

ParaTed2k

on Nov 17, 2005

WASHINGTON, JULY 8-- Iraqi radiological and nuclear materials with a potential use in weapons programs or dispersal devices have been removed from the country and airlifted to the United States, according to a July 6 press statement from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

In a joint Energy and Defense Department operation, 1.77 metric tons of low-enriched uranium and approximately 1000 highly radioactive sources were secured from Iraq's former nuclear research facility, packaged and then airlifted on June 23, the press statement said. Link

Iraqi radiological and nuclear materials with a potential use in weapons programs or dispersal devices have been removed from the country and airlifted to the United States, according to a July 6 press statement from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

In a joint Energy and Defense Department operation, 1.77 metric tons of low-enriched uranium and approximately 1000 highly radioactive sources were secured from Iraq's former nuclear research facility, packaged and then airlifted on June 23, the press statement said. Link

US reveals Iraq nuclear operation

Abraham called the operation a "major achievement"
The US has revealed that it removed more than 1.7 metric tons of radioactive material from Iraq in a secret operation last month.
"This operation was a major achievement," said US Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham in a statement.

He said it would keep "potentially dangerous nuclear materials out of the hands of terrorists".

Along with 1.77 tons of enriched uranium, about 1,000 "highly radioactive sources" were also removed. Link

U.S. Removes Nuclear and Radiological Materials from Iraq
Materials shipped to the U.S. June 23

Iraqi radiological and nuclear materials with a potential use in weapons programs or dispersal devices have been removed from the country and airlifted to the United States, according to a July 6 press statement from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

In a joint Energy and Defense Department operation, 1.77 metric tons of low-enriched uranium and approximately 1000 highly radioactive sources were secured from Iraq's former nuclear research facility, packaged and then airlifted on June 23, the press statement said. Link

It seems the fat and lazy paycheck thieves in teh U.S. press are the only ones who haven't seemed to pull their faces out of their bottles long enough to figure this may be "news".

When will there actually be "news" in the U.S. again?

Moderateman

on Nov 17, 2005

12 by ParaTed2k
Thursday, November 17, 2005

WASHINGTON, JULY 8-- Iraqi radiological and nuclear materials with a potential use in weapons programs or dispersal devices have been removed from the country and airlifted to the United States, according to a July 6 press statement from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

In a joint Energy and Defense Department operation, 1.77 metric tons of low-enriched uranium and approximately 1000 highly radioactive sources were secured from Iraq's former nuclear research facility, packaged and then airlifted on June 23, the press statement said. Link

Iraqi radiological and nuclear materials with a potential use in weapons programs or dispersal devices have been removed from the country and airlifted to the United States, according to a July 6 press statement from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

In a joint Energy and Defense Department operation, 1.77 metric tons of low-enriched uranium and approximately 1000 highly radioactive sources were secured from Iraq's former nuclear research facility, packaged and then airlifted on June 23, the press statement said. Link

US reveals Iraq nuclear operation

Abraham called the operation a "major achievement"
The US has revealed that it removed more than 1.7 metric tons of radioactive material from Iraq in a secret operation last month.
"This operation was a major achievement," said US Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham in a statement.

He said it would keep "potentially dangerous nuclear materials out of the hands of terrorists".

Along with 1.77 tons of enriched uranium, about 1,000 "highly radioactive sources" were also removed. Link

U.S. Removes Nuclear and Radiological Materials from Iraq
Materials shipped to the U.S. June 23

Iraqi radiological and nuclear materials with a potential use in weapons programs or dispersal devices have been removed from the country and airlifted to the United States, according to a July 6 press statement from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

In a joint Energy and Defense Department operation, 1.77 metric tons of low-enriched uranium and approximately 1000 highly radioactive sources were secured from Iraq's former nuclear research facility, packaged and then airlifted on June 23, the press statement said. Link ">Link

It seems the fat and lazy paycheck thieves in the U.S. press are the only ones who haven't seemed to pull their faces out of their bottles long enough to figure this may be "news".

When will there actually be "news" in the U.S. again?

thank you ted, I was hoping to inspire a few to seek out the same sources you just quoted, Before I wrote this I researched it and found all the answers. It seems that the only thing newsworthy to the left MUST DEMEAN OR TRASH THE PRESIDENT. WHY do not more people know all this info? because anything like it is buried behind a flurry of lies and prevarications. Much like the beheading of nick berg, about 4 articles about him, and 10000000000 about abu grahib.

bakerstreet

on Nov 18, 2005

Do you really think bin Laden is alive? I really, really don't know. Where is he? Where is this figurehead of his "people"? His value as the head of his movement is immense, and yet for some reason we see speeches from second lieutenants and henchmen. If he were alive I believe we'd be hearing something from him.

Moderateman

on Nov 18, 2005

Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Friday, November 18, 2005Do you really think bin Laden is alive? I really, really don't know. Where is he? Where is this figurehead of his "people"? His value as the head of his movement is immense, and yet for some reason we see speeches from second lieutenants and henchmen. If he were alive I believe we'd be hearing something from him.

the truth is we as american have not a clue if bin laden is alive, or even if he masterminded the sept 11 attacks.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!