Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Friday, September 30, 2005The interesting part Suspekted, is that you don't seem willing to google or Yahoo these Yea-hoos yourself. Then you accuse us of just accepting what someone else says about. If you aren't willing to research them yourself, aren't you merely relying on what we say? ;~D

naw sus just WANT us to PROVE what we are saying is truth.

btw MM likes sus and missed the old fogey when he was gone.

Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Friday, September 30, 2005be carefull doc someone might say you are prejudice against the googly challenged. bahahashahahahahGuilty.

Oh my God docguy is a racist against the googly challenged people. FOR SHAME!!... heh

Oh my God docguy is a racist against the googly challenged people. FOR SHAME!!... heh

Forgive me!  I am working on it.

The interesting part Suspekted, is that you don't seem willing to google or Yahoo these Yea-hoos yourself. Then you accuse us of just accepting what someone else says about. If you aren't willing to research them yourself, aren't you merely relying on what we say? ;~D

No, the real interesting part is that someone makes a claim without any sources backing it up and when I question it you all suggest I go look for sources to prove his point. If someone has a point to make, they should back it up, that's all I asked. You're all big boys, you do your own homework. If I stood firmly that I believed these three weren't the racists you've made them out to be I wouldn't make you guys chase down info to back that up for me.

naw sus just WANT us to PROVE what we are saying is truth.

exactly

No, the real interesting part is that someone makes a claim without any sources backing it up and when I question it you all suggest I go look for sources to prove his point. If someone has a point to make, they should back it up, that's all I asked. You're all big boys, you do your own homework. If I stood firmly that I believed these three weren't the racists you've made them out to be I wouldn't make you guys chase down info to back that up for me.

But Suspeckted, as soon as we did, you accepted it without question. You also accepted our sources without question.

You say they aren't racists. Ok, I'll put the question to you, what has either of the three ever done to improve the lives of Black people in America other than themselves?

They call themselves "Black Leaders", how racist do they have to be to imagine that they speak for all Black people?

~~~~~

They are racist because, while they claim to raise money and work towards the betterment of Black people in America, they do nothing but work to keep Black people down, for their own profit.

They are racist because, while they claim to raise money and work towards the betterment of Black people in America, they do nothing but work to keep Black people down, for their own profit.

they are working for the betterment of black people.... themselves.

I did not accept your sources without question ParaTed, why do you think I said in comment #42: "Umm, great so some crackpot posted some article talking about "alleged" remarks by Sharpton, what's the source on this?" I 100% questioned the source. I do not accept things without question.

Seriously, this is what pisses me off. I'm the only one here offering any kind of counter argument and I get slammed with people who don't even read my posts or take any time to try and consider my points.

And I wonder why there is no real discussion on this blog site, just blind leftists and rightists who have discovered some miraculous way to post their comments with their heads buried up their asses. There, now I added to the real discussion going on here, rhetorical garbage.

Seriously, this is what pisses me off. I'm the only one here offering any kind of counter argument and I get slammed with people who don't even read my posts or take any time to try and consider my points. And I wonder why there is no real discussion on this blog site, just blind leftists and rightists who have discovered some miraculous way to post their comments with their heads buried up their asses. There, now I added to the real discussion going on here, rhetorical garbage.

sus I have neither slammed nor disrespected you. I respect your views even when I disagree with them.

that was 99% directed at ParaTed2k

56 by Suspeckted Monday, October 03, 2005

that was 99% directed at ParaTed2k

well then make it clear brudda.

the slave trade was started by arabs and blacks, exactly, then sold to white shippers who brought them to the united states. Some how this part of history falls in between the cracks.

Yeah, why is that? Why is it that the fact that black tribal leader sold their own people into slavery ignored? Because it doesn't fit in the the stereotypical 'whitey is evil' image?

I did not accept your sources without question ParaTed, why do you think I said in comment #42: "Umm, great so some crackpot posted some article talking about "alleged" remarks by Sharpton, what's the source on this?"

I will concede and withdraw Sharpton.  I probably can find some stuff, but that would not make him the biggest racist, just another one.  In his place, I nominate Charles Rangel.

Reply By: dharmagrlPosted: Monday, October 03, 2005the slave trade was started by arabs and blacks, exactly, then sold to white shippers who brought them to the united states. Some how this part of history falls in between the cracks.Yeah, why is that? Why is it that the fact that black tribal leader sold their own people into slavery ignored? Because it doesn't fit in the the stereotypical 'whitey is evil' image?

because it's not POLITICALLY CORRECT to point out any bad things about minorites and blacks in particular.

wow whip, suspected should be satisfied now. thank you for the time and effort this took.

xoxo

elie

Kudos, whip appreciate the information, and from the beginning I never had any doubt that Farrakhan would belong on a list like this, however, recent comments about "where is the KKK when you need them," leads me to be highly skeptical of your ability to pick out who the racists are, but these stories about Sharpton seem to speak well enough.

While I have gained more insight into the underbelly of these three men, I will always caution you to label someone as the biggest, or greatest of anything. It seems to overshadow that widerspread smaller levels of racism that affect each of us more than probably either of these three men could. I understand that you point them out as leaders, but there are many other factors that perpetuate their ignorance more than what has been claimed to be their simple desire to gain personally from spreading black on white racism.

Each of us has racial prejudices regardless of what they claim along with a number of other prejudices. Preconceptions about those we are not familiar with or generalizations about those we are familiar with form our opinions and beliefs about certain groups of people everyday. In other threads I've admitted being a classist, and I also admit that I am not half as color blind as a I wish I was.