America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
Jesse jackson rides again
Published on August 9, 2005 By Moderateman In Democrat
August 06, 2005
40 Years After Passage, Voting Law Is in Dispute
Liberals oppose law requiring identification to vote:

yep time for jesse to continue making victims of the blacks and minorities, God forbid they have real identification to prove who they are. Only jesse can make a reasonable request turn into racist behavior

Today marks the 40th year of the Voting Rights Act, and civil rights activists poured into sticky-hot Atlanta for a march that harks back to the thunderous demonstrations and rallies that led to the act's signing on Aug. 6, 1965.
But black, Hispanic and Asian American leaders who plan to link arms in front of the Georgia Capitol said this protest is no historic reenactment. They are fighting a law passed by the state's Republican-controlled legislature in March that requires voters to obtain one of six forms of photo identification before going to the polls, as opposed to the 17 types of picture and non-picture ID they currently use. Georgia officials say the changes -- which experts say will make the state's screening measures the strictest in the nation -- are needed to prevent fraud.


This is what is currently allowed as ID to vote in Georgia:

(1) a valid Georgia driver's license;
(2) a valid identification card issued by a branch, department, agency, or entity of the State of Georgia, any other state, or the United States authorized by law to issue personal identification;
(3) a valid United States passport;
(4) a valid employee identification card containing a photograph of the elector and issued by any branch, department, agency, or entity of the United States government, this state, or any county, municipality, board, authority, or other entity of this state;
(5) a valid employee identification card containing a photograph of the elector and issued by any employer of the elector in the ordinary course of such employer's business;
(6) a valid student identification card containing a photograph of the elector from any public or private college, university, or postgraduate technical or professional school located within the state of Georgia;
(7) a valid Georgia license to carry a pistol or revolver;
(8) a valid pilot's license issued by the Federal Aviation Administration or other authorized agency of the United States;
(9) a valid United States military identification card;
(10) a certified copy of the elector's birth certificate;
(11) a valid social security card;
(12) certified naturalization documentation;
(13) or a certified copy of court records showing adoption, name, or sex change;
(14) A copy of a utility bill;
(15) A bank statement (will be kept confidential);
(16) A government check or payment with name and address; or
(17) A government document that shows the name and address of the elector.

It's not hard to imagine the hodge-podge of leftist groups providing fake utility bills allowing a group of fringe dwellers to vote repeatedly.

Awareness of the legislation was raised this week with the release of memos written by Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts Jr. from his days as a young aide in Ronald Reagan's Justice Department. Those memos revealed that Roberts forcefully advocated a policy that would shorten the law's reach. The policy sought to bar only voting rules that discriminated intentionally, as opposed to barring rules that have a discriminatory effect.
This is code for "Roberts doesn't want the downtrodden to vote".

As Congress deliberates reauthorizing the act, which is set to expire at the end of next year, some conservative critics argue that two key provisions should be modified, if not dropped altogether. One of those provisions, Section 5, requires states to draw minority-controlled congressional districts if black and Hispanic voters dominate certain residential areas.
Section 5 also required election officials in nine states, mostly in the South, to submit any voting rules changes that might affect minorities to the Justice Department for pre-clearance.


Just let it die.

That is why Georgia's new identification requirement awaits a decision by Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, who could approve or challenge its implementation in the coming weeks. Rural black voters, many of whom are too poor to own cars, have said they can't get to one of the state's 56 driver's license offices to get a photo ID. Black legislators stormed out of chambers to protest the change.
Union thugs deploy each election day to drive society's victims to the polls. Why can't they be deployed to drive these losers to get a photo ID?

Kathay Feng, executive director of California Common Cause, recalled going to a senior citizen center there and seeing Chinese immigrants lined up to vote during the presidential election in 1996.
White poll workers didn't understand their Cantonese language, or even the way they pronounced their names. Finally, one worker asked if they could step aside "so that we could first help regular voters," Feng said.

"The law is still needed," she said.



Posted by joey at August 6, 2005 08:01 AM


Comments (Page 4)
6 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 6 
on Aug 11, 2005
Totally bogus argument


if someone hit you with a colostomy bag every day for 10 years and then stopped tossing colostomy bags at you for the next four years, how would you react to learning he suddenly decided to start stacking up colostomy bags within tossing distance of the route you use to pass by him?
on Aug 11, 2005
Well, I don't know who drove the busses here in Richmond, but the Dems were out here collecting street people by the dozen on election day, even lying to them and telling them they didnt have to be registered in order to vote. That's technically true, you don't.

However, if you want your vote to be counted, you have a set period of time after casting that vote to prove residency in that precinct. When the vast majority of them didn't, "disenfranchisement" was the battle cry.


what's that got to do with union thugs ferrying losers from deep in the country to polling places?
on Aug 11, 2005
I think implying that these 'po black folks' are incapable of accomplishing so basic a task as acquiring a single piece of identification, especially when its being offered free and delivered to their doorstep, is pretty damned racist on your part.


the only person who's saying anything similar to that is good ol plagiarizing joey (the purported author of the piece). mm is saying the minorities are too lazy to work. you've blatantly accusing black people (or maybe just the black people in your neighborhood) of voting fraud and strongly suggesting they're too stupid to understand how the law works.

you've falsely accused me of hijacking the thread (easily refuted) and cuz that didnt work you're tryin to turn spin it 180 degrees?

dig yourself.
on Aug 11, 2005
Lord knows dem po old darkies just aint capable of gettin demselves one o dem dere newfangled ID thingys, even if'n we gives it to dem free and delibers it to they doe's.

Dey be disenfranchised, dey will. Po ol darkies.


i truly hope hilary clinton does win the nomination cuz i recall you vowing to work actively against her. it would be so worth the cost of a trip to virginia to see you knockin on doors and then puttin on a real live minstrel show like this to demonstrate why your black neighbors should vote republican. (actually considering two of my favorite women in the world live in da ol dominion, even if your first performance turned out to be your last, the trip wouldnt be a total loss).
on Aug 11, 2005
Oh, Like Mass? Seems I remember the bussing riots back in the 70s in South Boston......MASS.


i hope you can see the difference between the concerted power of the state violating its citizens' civil rights and a mob of hateful irish-american racists foolishly trying to protect turf they only think they own...sorta like a buncha gangbangers.

blame nixon for bussing. he could have as easily done the right thing and brought all public schools up to the same level. without stirring up hatred between two members of the same economic people mighta noticed what he was doing earlier along with spiro 'kick me back some bucks' agnew.
on Aug 11, 2005
Oh, Like Mass? Seems I remember the bussing riots back in the 70s in South Boston......MASS.


i hope you can see the difference between the concerted power of the state violating its citizens' civil rights and a mob of hateful irish-american racists foolishly trying to protect turf they only think they own...sorta like a buncha gangbangers.

blame nixon for bussing. he could have as easily brought schools in minority neighborhoods up to those in the most exclusive communities instead. of course that wouldnt have pleased his southern strategy buddies...and it wouldnt have provided such an effective diversion to keep people's minds off, and attention away from tricky dick's middle-age crisis
on Aug 11, 2005
Guess it is a mis-understanding, not an understanding then


only if you can provide proof i'm wrong.
on Aug 12, 2005
wow kingbee so many answere to so many people, could it be that the vast majority is right and you are WRONG? naw to easy.
on Aug 12, 2005

'used to' for a 100 years. stopped only because they were forced to do so 40 years ago. and there is simple identification already in use. what egregious incidence of vote fraud compelled the georgia legislature to decide it was imperative they institute the most restrictive voting laws in the country this year?

Yea, but the north was doing it too.  And they are still not being forced.

kb, answer me this question.  What state elected the first AND only black governor.  Careful how you answer, your rationalization just got shot to shit.

on Aug 12, 2005

i hope you can see the difference between the concerted power of the state violating its citizens' civil rights and a mob of hateful irish-american racists foolishly trying to protect turf they only think they own...sorta like a buncha gangbangers.

Always excusing, never accepting responsibility or accountability.  And evading the issue again.

on Aug 12, 2005

only if you can provide proof i'm wrong.

I already did.  You just wont accept it.

on Aug 12, 2005
wow kingbee so many answere to so many people, could it be that the vast majority is right and you are WRONG? naw to easy


wow mm...it's a good thing you didn't live in a time when the vast majority thought eclipses were caused by dragons eating the moon and people were jailed for suggesting the earth went around the sun instead of the sun goin around the earth.

you're right about one thing tho: it's much easier to be a good little bot.
on Aug 12, 2005
Yea, but the north was doing it too. And they are still not being forced.


doing what? arresting and brutalizing blacks who dared to try and register to vote? requiring blacks to take voter's tests noone--including constitutional law experts--could hope to pass? which northern state was doing that in the 1950s and 60s?
on Aug 12, 2005
What state elected the first AND only black governor. Careful how you answer, your rationalization just got shot to shit.


which state couldnt have possibly elected a black governor for 90 years (1877 thru 1965) because of systemic disfranchisement of its black citizens. while it's commendable that virginians elected a black governor in the late 80s, it's disgustingly shameful that that it took so long. kinda like patting yourself on the back cuz you no longer beat your wife.
on Aug 12, 2005
Kingbee, I really fail to see the racism you point out in this article. All it's about is the efforts of blacks and other minorities to resist a law that makes perfect sense, just so they can cry foul. Nothing new there.
Hmm...then again, maybe there is a bit of racial stereotyping, after all.
6 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 6