Our liberal supreme court in action.

on Jun 23, 2005

Reply By: InfoGeekPosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005I read an article from Slate on this in Feb. and thought, no way the family would lose. I mean we're not talking a bridge, bypass,etc. It's a shopping mall, or some such. I can just imagine how a guy who owns a few acres near prime commercial land must feel. IG

shopping mall and office building , riverfront property

17

zinkadoodle

on Jun 23, 2005

Ya know, mm, I really take umbrage at your misplaced hatred of liberals. In fact, I'm rather sick of your constant trash talking. When I read the article earlier today, I thought the decision really sucked. The only way one can remotely compensate a homeowner is to give em some stock or a piece of the company that will be planted on top of what was once their home. I'm a liberal. So, my advice to you is go play in traffic.

18

Moderateman

on Jun 23, 2005

17 by zinkadoodle
Thursday, June 23, 2005

Ya know, mm, I really take umbrage at your misplaced hatred of liberals. In fact, I'm rather sick of your constant trash talking. When I read the article earlier today, I thought the decision really sucked. The only way one can remotely compensate a homeowner is to give em some stock or a piece of the company that will be planted on top of what was once their home. I'm a liberal. So, my advice to you is go play in traffic.

ouch, you really told me.I think I will now stop writing completely so not to offend your sense of right and wrong..

I live in a gated community btw no traffic for me to play in, maybe you can tell me where you live and I could play in traffic there.

19

drmiler

on Jun 23, 2005

Reply By: drmilerPosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005I'm sorry MM forgive my language. What a LOAD OF SHIT

the supreme court or me?

Without question or qualms....THE COURT!

20

drmiler

on Jun 23, 2005

Ya know, mm, I really take umbrage at your misplaced hatred of liberals. In fact, I'm rather sick of your constant trash talking. When I read the article earlier today, I thought the decision really sucked. The only way one can remotely compensate a homeowner is to give em some stock or a piece of the company that will be planted on top of what was once their home. I'm a liberal. So, my advice to you is go play in traffic

My advice to you would be to go sit in a corner and exercise your right or left hand excitedly in an up and down motion! You don't like the article? Then by God, DON'T read it!

21

drmiler

on Jun 24, 2005

Hey MM...whadya think of the reply?

22

Gene Nash

on Jun 24, 2005

I thought Conservatives were supposed to be in the pocket of corporate America. Or is it just that promoting "Big Government" trumps "protecting the rights of the little guy"?

What is wrong with people who don't check the top 10 recent articles?

I've always thought this attitude was B.S.

I don't care if 20 people write the same bloody article. It's their blog to do with as they please. "Gee, the NYT covered this, Nashville Courier. What the hell are you doing writing about it?" Give me a break.

23

Dr Guy

on Jun 24, 2005

Ya know, mm, I really take umbrage at your misplaced hatred of liberals. In fact, I'm rather sick of your constant trash talking. When I read the article earlier today, I thought the decision really sucked. The only way one can remotely compensate a homeowner is to give em some stock or a piece of the company that will be planted on top of what was once their home. I'm a liberal. So, my advice to you is go play in traffic.

If you cant play with the big boys, go to your sandbox and suck on your pacifier.

24

Rightwinger

on Jun 24, 2005

My friends lost their home to eminent domain YEARS ago, when the state wanted to put through a highway. They were paid a "reasonable" amount for their home which was less than they'd probably gotten if they'd sold it on the market, but nonetheless lost it. Also, my father-in-law has been fighting ED attempts to take his property for some time. Welcome to America.

25

Moderateman

on Jun 24, 2005

Reply By: drmilerPosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005Reply By: drmilerPosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005I'm sorry MM forgive my language. What a LOAD OF SHITthe supreme court or me?Without question or qualms....THE COURT!

and the left will make sure any conservative that tries to be placed on the spureme court falls under "extraordinary circumstances" and filibuster them.

26

Moderateman

on Jun 24, 2005

Reply By: drmilerPosted: Thursday, June 23, 2005Ya know, mm, I really take umbrage at your misplaced hatred of liberals. In fact, I'm rather sick of your constant trash talking. When I read the article earlier today, I thought the decision really sucked. The only way one can remotely compensate a homeowner is to give em some stock or a piece of the company that will be planted on top of what was once their home. I'm a liberal. So, my advice to you is go play in trafficMy advice to you would be to go sit in a corner and exercise your right or left hand excitedly in an up and down motion! You don't like the article? Then by God, DON'T read it!

I have always wondered why when the title explains what is to follow why they read it, maybe they like getting pissed.

27

Moderateman

on Jun 24, 2005

Reply By: drmilerPosted: Friday, June 24, 2005Hey MM...whadya think of the reply?

as always I love it!@!!!

28

Moderateman

on Jun 24, 2005

Reply By: Gene NashPosted: Friday, June 24, 2005I thought Conservatives were supposed to be in the pocket of corporate America. Or is it just that promoting "Big Government" trumps "protecting the rights of the little guy"?What is wrong with people who don't check the top 10 recent articles?I've always thought this attitude was B.S.I don't care if 20 people write the same bloody article. It's their blog to do with as they please. "Gee, the NYT covered this, Nashville Courier. What the hell are you doing writing about it?" Give me a break.

I gave a kind reply, and a truthfull one to him, I guess he still thinks this is grade school and who ever calls "dibs" gets to keep it.

29

Moderateman

on Jun 24, 2005

Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Friday, June 24, 2005Ya know, mm, I really take umbrage at your misplaced hatred of liberals. In fact, I'm rather sick of your constant trash talking. When I read the article earlier today, I thought the decision really sucked. The only way one can remotely compensate a homeowner is to give em some stock or a piece of the company that will be planted on top of what was once their home. I'm a liberal. So, my advice to you is go play in traffic. If you cant play with the big boys, go to your sandbox and suck on your pacifier.

another one that can dish it out and not take it! typical of the left.

30

Moderateman

on Jun 24, 2005

Reply By: RightwingerPosted: Friday, June 24, 2005My friends lost their home to eminent domain YEARS ago, when the state wanted to put through a highway. They were paid a "reasonable" amount for their home which was less than they'd probably gotten if they'd sold it on the market, but nonetheless lost it. Also, my father-in-law has been fighting ED attempts to take his property for some time. Welcome to America.

I can live with E.D. IF its used as traditional applied, but this new one is total crap.

sorry about your friend, and GO DAD GO beat them at there own game.