David Dukes vrs Ward Churchill

2 peas in a pod,A sick twisted pod at that!

Published on February 25, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics

Last night after listening to David Dukes {yep KKK David Dukes} Trash Ward Churchill I came to a realization there is no difference between the two.

David Dukes while claiming to be a conservative is nothing more than a hate filled racist pig. HE does NOT represent me< my Party or my values any more than Ward Churchill represents the Democratic Party and their values.

The two of them are so hate filled and full of themselves they could be twins, sick twisted twins.

I distance myself from crazies Like Dukes Because of his hate politics.
The Democrats should do the same with Ward Churchill.

Both of these men are what are wrong about America today. Dripping venom both, one disguised as a patriot, the other disguised as a dissenter.

Any Republican that holds the views of a David dukes is someone I want silenced because of the damage he inflicts.

Any Democrat that holds the views of ward Churchill should be silenced too.

Neither one of these sick mo-fo’s have a clue of what an American patriot is.

Comments (Page 1)

bakerstreet

on Feb 25, 2005

The educational community seems to take a lot longer to brush someone off as hateful than anyone else.

After 20 years, a lot of the "cultural" folks who gained power in the late 70's and 80's are begining to be seen for what they are. Granted, for the rest of us, people like Dukes and Churchil are immediately obvious. For some reason, though, if someone has tenure it gives them a bit more wiggle-room.

There's as much room for racial, political or religious activism in higher learning as there is in journalism. The Vietnam War era was ruinous for these venues, because they were seen as tools to help "causes". In reality they are places where fact should reign.

The sad part is Churchill is torpedoing his cause by associating it with the kind of racial hate that Americans have already rejected. To fall back on the ideals that Malcolm X, himself, eventually rejected is ignorant and self-defeating.

Insightful.

Moderateman

on Feb 25, 2005

The sad part is Churchill is torpedoing his cause by associating it with the kind of racial hate that Americans have already rejected. To fall back on the ideals that Malcolm X, himself, eventually rejected is ignorant and self-defeating.

thank you.... I lived in harlem when "red" changed his way leaving the black muslims behind... malcom was so blown away when he went to Mecca and guarding the enterance that day was a blue eyed blond muslim, that was malcoms wake up call. I hope more democrats start distancing themselves from these far far leftwing cretins, They need to make it plain to the american public men like ward churchill DOES NOT represent the morals and values of their Party.

Island Dog

on Feb 25, 2005

David Dukes while claiming to be a conservative is nothing more than a hate filled racist pig. HE does NOT represent me< my Party or my values any more than Ward Churchill represents the Democratic Party and their values.

I just have to disagree with part of your statement. I think Churchhill represents a great part of the democratic party. That part being being the extreme liberal base that has taken over the party.

Moderateman

on Feb 25, 2005

Reply By: Island DogPosted: Friday, February 25, 2005

just have to disagree with part of your statement. I think Churchhill represents a great part of the democratic party. That part being being the extreme liberal base that has taken over the party

Much as I enjoy bashing liberals..... the majority of democrats are not i repeat not far leftwing idiots.... and if you tell any democrats I defended them I will deny ever saying this..... the preceeding is an A>I> program that had "learned" to respond to posts.

*smirk*

Island Dog

on Feb 25, 2005

Maybe right now the majority of democrats are not far left wing, but it's moving in that direction. That's why the party is headed for destruction.

Moderateman

on Feb 25, 2005

Reply By: Island DogPosted: Friday, February 25, 2005Maybe right now the majority of democrats are not far left wing, but it's moving in that direction. That's why the party is headed for destruction.

I sure hope not.. even though I am a staunch repuplican supporter, I still see the need for a strong centered democratic party. a one party system smacks of dictator rules.

Moderateman

on Feb 25, 2005

Reply By: little_whipPosted: Friday, February 25, 2005

Oh, and its DUKE, not Dukes

i sit corrected...... and when I say silenced I mean if people distance themselves from jerks like this, in effect they are silenced. or maybe we can go the Saddam Hussein way and just cut their tongues out and feed the poor.

mmmmmmmmmm........ tongue

thatoneguyinslc

on Feb 25, 2005

Did you just say something nice about dems? WHO ARE YOU AND WHAT DID YOU DO TO MODMAN????

Seriously, These two are a couple of guys having a battle of wits with no ammo.

ParaTed2k

on Feb 25, 2005

The major difference I see between David Duke and Ward Churchill is, while David Duke enjoys a small following, he has been soundly rejected by Conservatives in general. Ward Churchill, on the other hand, is not only being defended and anyone who is against taxpayer money supporting his appearances is painted as an anti Freedom of Speech fascists.

Both are lying, waste of human flesh hatemongers who have little or nothing worthwhile to say to anyone. The difference is, academia is insisting that taxpayer and education dollars should be used to sponsor Churchill's hate.

bakerstreet

on Feb 25, 2005

"Both are lying, waste of human flesh hatemongers who have little or nothing worthwhile to say to anyone. The difference is, academia is insisting that taxpayer and education dollars should be used to sponsor Churchill's hate."

Churchill can scream tenure and lawsuits all he likes, but I wonder how long a tenured professor would last if he tried to make the arguement that innocent civilians in Iraq got what they deserved because they hadn't thwarted Hussein's rule.

Basically, that is his double standard. The Americans on 9-11 weren't victims, because they were cogs in an evil machine, who could have opted to fight that machine. On the other hand all the little cogs in Iraq who opted to not to risk their lives fighting Hussein are "innocent".

Load of crap.

Moderateman

on Feb 26, 2005

Reply By: thatoneguyinslcPosted: Friday, February 25, 2005Did you just say something nice about dems? WHO ARE YOU AND WHAT DID YOU DO TO MODMAN????

I know shocking huh? but try to remember I was a registered democrat for 36 years.

Moderateman

on Feb 26, 2005

Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Friday, February 25, 2005The major difference I see between David Duke and Ward Churchill is, while David Duke enjoys a small following, he has been soundly rejected by Conservatives in general. Ward Churchill, on the other hand, is not only being defended and anyone who is against taxpayer money supporting his appearances is painted as an anti Freedom of Speech fascists.Both are lying, waste of human flesh hatemongers who have little or nothing worthwhile to say to anyone. The difference is, academia is insisting that taxpayer and education dollars should be used to sponsor Churchill's hate.

I think the best moves the democrats can do is put alot of spacve between themselves and ANY far left lunitic.
It won't happen, but one can only hope.

The decline of the democratic party is because they refuse to disavow these morons that preach hatred under the guise of dissent.

Moderateman

on Feb 26, 2005

Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Friday, February 25, 2005"Both are lying, waste of human flesh hatemongers who have little or nothing worthwhile to say to anyone. The difference is, academia is insisting that taxpayer and education dollars should be used to sponsor Churchill's hate."Churchill can scream tenure and lawsuits all he likes, but I wonder how long a tenured professor would last if he tried to make the arguement that innocent civilians in Iraq got what they deserved because they hadn't thwarted Hussein's rule.Basically, that is his double standard. The Americans on 9-11 weren't victims, because they were cogs in an evil machine, who could have opted to fight that machine. On the other hand all the little cogs in Iraq who opted to not to risk their lives fighting Hussein are "innocent".Load of crap.

if enrollment keeps declining and alumni withhold money, watch how fast churchill is gone... you heard it here first.

Island Dog

on Feb 26, 2005

He might go, but how many other crazy leftist professors are there are all these Universities.

Dr Guy

on Mar 02, 2005

MM, I am glad Brad Featured this one or I would have missed it!

And I wish I had written it! Insighful, and correct! I see where you even got kudos from some liberals!

At least some of them condemn Ward Churchill! If only the rest would..........

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!