Ward Churchill the PERFECT Liberal

This male is GOOD for Republicans

Published on February 23, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics

Ward Churchill, the perfect example of how far the liberal left has sunk.

Universities are honoring this America hating liberal around the country, the most recent the university of Hawaii, who not only paid this idiot to speak also gave him a paid vacation.

This man compares the innocent victims of the twin tower slaughter to NAZI”S He says that they deserved to be slaughtered.

I think the liberals have finally found their perfect presidential candidate for 2008, someone that epitomizes the platform of the far left.
He meets all the far left requirements, He hates America, he is completely out of touch with anything rational and he is a good speaker.

He received 3 standing ovations while talking at u of h for his outspoken Bush bashing America hating rhetoric, what a guy!

With these fine speakers for the left, Mickey Moore, Howard dean, Ted Kennedy, Nancy pelosi, al sharpton and Hanoi john Kerry with the wrong reverend Jesse James Jackson they have a solid base of liberal piles of dung to choose from.

How can any Democrat be proud of any of these examples of flotsam and jetsam?

One thing for sure the future is BRIGHT for republicans with all these sick liberals to choose from.

Comments

Gopteen

on Feb 23, 2005

You are absolutly correct. You are not really moderate are you.

Moderateman

on Feb 23, 2005

Reply By: GopteenPosted: Wednesday, February 23, 2005You are absolutly correct. You are not really moderate are you

am too! lol I am just brutally honest about how I feel.

cactoblasta

on Feb 23, 2005

have you ever written anything criticising conservatives? If so I've never seen it...

But anyway, back to the topic. Are you sure he's a liberal? If all he does is hate America, he could be a right-wing conservative fundamentalist Iranian. If all he does is speak well, he could be Adolf Hitler reborn. If all he is is be out of touch, he could be Ross Perot. The three together are hardly the basis of the liberal ideology (ie, belief in human rights, a distaste for government interference etc)

Moderateman

on Feb 24, 2005

Reply By: cactoblastaPosted: Wednesday, February 23, 2005have you ever written anything criticising conservatives? If so I've never seen it...But anyway, back to the topic. Are you sure he's a liberal? If all he does is hate America, he could be a right-wing conservative fundamentalist Iranian. If all he does is speak well, he could be Adolf Hitler reborn. If all he is is be out of touch, he could be Ross Perot. The three together are hardly the basis of the liberal ideology (ie, belief in human rights, a distaste for government interference etc

yes i have I blasted newt gingridge,,, and yes he is a liberal, and he proudly states it. This would be a perfect time for true right thinking liberlas to distance themselves from the far left lunitics. People like churchill do the democratic party a grave injustice.

ParaTed2k

on Feb 24, 2005

Apparently all you have to do to be respected by acedemia is bash America and be 1/16th Native American... oops, he lied about that too!!

Have you noticed, the liberals in acedemia don't seem to care about that either?

bakerstreet

on Feb 24, 2005

Here's the rant that got it all started "Some People Push Back: On the Justice of Roosting Chickens"

He was also quoted as saying...

""The men who flew the missions against the WTC and Pentagon were not "cowards." That distinction properly belongs to the "firm-jawed lads" who delighted in flying stealth aircraft through the undefended airspace of Baghdad, dropping payload after payload of bombs on anyone unfortunate enough to be below – including tens of thousands of genuinely innocent civilians – while themselves incurring all the risk one might expect during a visit to the local video arcade."

ParaTed2k

on Feb 24, 2005

Sounds like both the bombs and the airliners hit the wrong target!!

Ward Churchill is to quality education as Manatees are to aerodynamic flight.

Gideon MacLeish

on Feb 24, 2005

I don't think we killed "tens of thousands" during that war, period, much less "tens of thousands of innocent civilians."

I don't know the casualty count, but I DO know that "innocent victims" are ALWAYS a tragic consequence of the actions of stupid leaders.

Moderateman

on Feb 24, 2005

Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Thursday, February 24, 2005Apparently all you have to do to be respected by acedemia is bash America and be 1/16th Native American... oops, he lied about that too!!Have you noticed, the liberals in acedemia don't seem to care about that either?

liberals only care when a conservative tells a lie, then it's the end of the world.

Moderateman

on Feb 24, 2005

Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Thursday, February 24, 2005Here's the rant that got it all started "Some People Push Back: On the Justice of Roosting Chickens" He was also quoted as saying...""The men who flew the missions against the WTC and Pentagon were not "cowards." That distinction properly belongs to the "firm-jawed lads" who delighted in flying stealth aircraft through the undefended airspace of Baghdad, dropping payload after payload of bombs on anyone unfortunate enough to be below – including tens of thousands of genuinely innocent civilians – while themselves incurring all the risk one might expect during a visit to the local video arcade."

whats driving me crazy is this unamerican moron is be hailed as some kind of hero. makes me puke.

Moderateman

on Feb 24, 2005

Reply By: little_whipPosted: Thursday, February 24, 2005including tens of thousands of genuinely innocent civilians I don't think we killed "tens of thousands" during that war, period, much less "tens of thousands of innocent civilians."If just being in the vicinity of the bombing makes one a victim, then 9/11 had MILLIONS of them, not just 3000 or so.Talk about twisted logic.

One of the main symptoms of "democratic Dementia" is forgetting anything they ever said, or just lieing their asses off to make a non point.

Moderateman

on Feb 24, 2005

Reply By: Gideon MacLeishPosted: Thursday, February 24, 2005I don't think we killed "tens of thousands" during that war, period, much less "tens of thousands of innocent civilians."I don't know the casualty count, but I DO know that "innocent victims" are ALWAYS a tragic consequence of the actions of stupid leaders.

collateral damage {sanitized meaning for death by being to close to war} is one of the true horrors of war.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!