No wmd in Iraq

The Left rejoices

Published on January 12, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics

Ah yes the left is now Jumping with joy... There is happiness in mudville today.

Many "I told you so's" are flying.

The cia reports the search of wmd in Iraq is over.

Well my question is WHERE ARE THEY THEN.?

Instead of rejoicing, the search should be intensified, to dismiss the idea saddam had wmds is folly.

I for one want to know what happened to all those chemical weapons.

Anyone that had been through basic training {boot camp} has experenced what it is like to breathe a very mild chemical weapon
{tear gas} to think that other much more toxic chem weaps are on the loose is damn frightening.

While the left is whooping it up laughing I sure hope they do not have to experence what it is like to have your lungs burst, eyes bleed, vomit blood and become a victim of this terrible weapon.

For anyone to believe saddam had no wmds is insane. but then thats what I have been saying all along, the left is completely out of touch with the harsh realities of life.

I wonder what the left is going to say if a wmd is released here in america?

I can hear it now, well bush was asleep at the switch again, the left will just not accept any responsibility for anything.

So whoop it up while you can lefties, while the american people are in peril.

Then remember to say< well I thought all along there were wmds, Bush should have searched harder, put more people on
the case. After all I did proclaim saddam has wmds all along. At this point all "dementia" from the left would disappear, as they once again accept no responsibility for anything.

Comments (Page 2)

theknitter

on Jan 12, 2005

QUOTE " I wonder what the left is going to say if a wmd is released here in america? UNQUOTE

They'll probably say "HOLD YOUR BREATH" ....

But didn't yer man ..... Colin Powell produce photographs of a "WMD" facility in Iraq - and when the USA and the "Coalition of the Willing" got to this facility all they found was a MacDonald's Burger Joint ???

If I was working in a MacDonald's Burger Joint I'd be worried if Americans came in and ordered a meal.........

Dr Guy

on Jan 12, 2005

But didn't yer man ..... Colin Powell produce photographs of a "WMD" facility in Iraq - and when the USA and the "Coalition of the Willing" got to this facility all they found was a MacDonald's Burger Joint ???

No, Colin Powell produced evidence they were there. Apparently, and this is what I believe, Saddam hid the fact he had gotten rid of them (used or moved out of country) to hide the fact from his neighbors. Without them, Iran would be less likely to not attack, or so his warped mind thought.

He fooled us and everyone else. When we went in, no one doubted they were there, and the inspectors could not find where he had destroyed them. Like OBL, he underestimated Dubya and paid for that underestimation.

Moderateman

on Jan 12, 2005

Reply #16 By: theknitter - 1/12/2005 6:08:03 PM
QUOTE " I wonder what the left is going to say if a wmd is released here in america? UNQUOTE

They'll probably say "HOLD YOUR BREATH" ....

lmaa thanx for the giggle...

Moderateman

on Jan 12, 2005

Reply #17 By: Dr. Guy - 1/12/2005 6:21:28 PM

now if just one lefty would say that I could be content.

whoman69

on Jan 12, 2005

all true and all good, still tho, why did not saddam just show and tell bout wmds? specially when the us military was poised on his doorstep.

the appearance of WMDs was Saddams only trump card, and it was a 3 of spades. They bought into a bluff with 1000 dead and over 10,000 wounded.

latour999

on Jan 12, 2005

come on whoman lighten up will ya ...no one likes war and I can see your point, bnut if this post of yours was seen by our troops imagine what they would feel.

Do you want him to lie?

Moderateman

on Jan 12, 2005

Reply By: whoman69Posted: Wednesday, January 12, 2005all true and all good, still tho, why did not saddam just show and tell bout wmds? specially when the us military was poised on his doorstep.the appearance of WMDs was Saddams only trump card, and it was a 3 of spades. They bought into a bluff with 1000 dead and over 10,000 wounded.

come on whoman lighten up will ya ...no one likes war and I can see your point, bnut if this post of yours was seen by our troops imagine what they would feel.

Moderateman

on Jan 13, 2005

Reply By: latour999Posted: Wednesday, January 12, 2005come on whoman lighten up will ya ...no one likes war and I can see your point, bnut if this post of yours was seen by our troops imagine what they would feel.Do you want him to lie?

no latour I do not want him to ie or anyone lie for that matter.... I just want the whole truth, that the entire leftwing {the dems} thought the same exact thing bush did, THAT SADDAM HAD WMDS, how come NOT ONE OF YOU GUYS remember that? not one111 whatever happened to the dems that they are so perfect they never ever make a mistake....... its that attitude and the FACT not one dem appealed to me that made me switch parties, even tho I was registered dems since 1968....couples with the fact FACT that hanoi john kerry is a traitor and demeaned me and every vietnam vet in his 1971 speech to the congress.

ParaTed2k

on Jan 13, 2005

When people start throwing around names of other countries with WMD, they need to remember...

1) WMD was just one of the reasons given by Prs. Bush to go back into Iraq

and more importantly

2) None of the other nations brought up in this type of discussion continuously broke a ceasefire agreement with the U.S.

We took it seriously enough to turn over all occupied areas and assets of Iraq back to the Hussein regime and redeploy home.

The UN took it seriously enough (at least at first) to officially endorse it.

Apparently Hussein only took it seriously long enough for us to leave.

Last I checked, a broken ceasefire agreement has always been justification for a return to hostilities. If it isn't, then the ceasefire agreement isn't worth crap and we should never enter into them again.

drmiler

on Jan 13, 2005

Reply #1 By: Myrrander - 1/12/2005 12:29:00 PM
ah, well, a lot of the weapons inspectors from pre-1998 seem to think that those weapons were destroyed

I think the weapons inspectors are FU in the head. I mmean after all they didn't know about the upgraded 23 Iraqi high performance MIGS that were found buried in the sand now did they?

Moderateman

on Jan 13, 2005

Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Thursday, January 13, 2005When people start throwing around names of other countries with WMD, they need to remember...1) WMD was just one of the reasons given by Prs. Bush to go back into Iraqand more importantly2) None of the other nations brought up in this type of discussion continuously broke a ceasefire agreement with the U.S.We took it seriously enough to turn over all occupied areas and assets of Iraq back to the Hussein regime and redeploy home.The UN took it seriously enough (at least at first) to officially endorse it.Apparently Hussein only took it seriously long enough for us to leave.Last I checked, a broken ceasefire agreement has always been justification for a return to hostilities. If it isn't, then the ceasefire agreement isn't worth crap and we should never enter into them again.

again I reiterate.... the left conviently forgets evrything THEY said and agreed with before the war.... the left are the utimate masters of 20/20 hindsight.,..

Moderateman

on Jan 13, 2005

there ya go ted typeing common sense to the lunatics........ its like pissin INTO the wind.. altho ya get the pee out, ya wind up with it all over ya..

Solitair

on Jan 14, 2005

no one doubted they were there

Not true. Many did doubt they were there (UN France, Russia), that was the problem the US had. Everyone knew Saddam once had WMD, knew their was no concrete proof that it had all been dsetroyed, but were not sure he still had any. The US could not convince countries like France and Russia that any were still there. If you recall the French president went on US TV and said that he knew Saddam once had WMD but that he had seen no proof that he currently had them.

Paul.

whoman69

on Jan 14, 2005

again I reiterate.... the left conviently forgets evrything THEY said and agreed with before the war.... the left are the utimate masters of 20/20 hindsight.,..

with intelligence the administration asked the intelligence community to color so the obvious reaction would be WMDs. people were fired in the intelligence community because they did not want to play along. the administration conveniently scheduled hearings to look into whether the administration ordered the intelligence community to give only information that backed their thesis until after the election. As it looks now, I haven't heard anything as to whether they ever will convene. How convenient. You can claim the Dems are using 20/20 hindsite. I will counter that Republicans choose to ignore the problems and stay the course.

Moderateman

on Jan 14, 2005

Reply By: whoman69Posted: Friday, January 14, 2005

will counter that Republicans choose to ignore the problems and stay the course.

I will see your "counter" and "raise" you Unpatriotic left blather.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!