Another reason the left makes me nutso

from hannity and colmbs

Published on January 11, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics

Last nite while watching hannity and colmbs I witnessed another leftwing crazy,this time a teacher from the university of texas....

Again I had to be put tho the TORTURE of listening to this nut job whine and cry about "how this adminasration lied" have ya noticed when a lefty says "this adminastration" is sounds like someone cussing?.
When are they going to get over NOT finding wmd? how much longer will they pound this already crushed dead horse, till there is just a red stain left is my guess.

How come none of the left REMEMBERS kerry, kennedy, edwards, shrillery, saying "there is no doubt that saddam has weapons of mass destruction.

The left is not dumb in fact there are some brillant minds there... but do they all suffer from dementia?

this teacher of our youth has free reign to poison the minds of our children that are in his charge.

He {the teacher} is happy the war in Iraq is going badly...{his words not mine} and hopes we lose there..
What kind of american hopes we lose in a war???

Is this what the war protestor movement has degraded too? Not just being content with protesting the war, but accually wanting the united states to lose.

Altho I support and respect anyones right to protest the war.... an american wishing we lose is a traitor.

The left has a huge majority in colleges over 9 to 1 at last count....

this kind of sabatage by teachers must be stopped..

If this same teacher said "christ is my savior" he would be censored and distained.. but he gets away with this drival.... bashing and hoping america loses a war LOSES A WAR!!!

When will the left see that THEY ARE THE DIVIDERS OF THIS COUNTRY.. not the right.. we are the uniters.

The new stragity of the left is... if it makes us look good and it costs someone else the money we do it>
If bush supports it... we won't
If its not our idea it won't work
If its the rights idea ..it stinks.
We are THE party of the people, what people I ask............pray tell"

Comments (Page 2)

latour999

on Jan 11, 2005

Now, I have to say that the reason the young are liberal is they don't have money. They don't worry about taxes. Thats the sole reason.

But there is a difference between liberal with money (socialist) and socially liberal (pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, etc.)

Heydre

on Jan 11, 2005

If you'd have listened to your teachers more closely you'd be able to spell......sorry but it's hard to read any argument when basic spelling is ignored.

Moderateman

on Jan 11, 2005

Reply #14 By: whoman69 - 1/11/2005 9:37:14 PM
ah, you could be right. but Ashcroft was a real nutter, man

doesn't everyone dress up naked statues?

only if the statues penis is bigger than theres lol

Moderateman

on Jan 11, 2005

Reply #15 By: sandy2 - 1/11/2005 10:44:04 PM
Well... I'd say gonzales is gonna be worse.. ignoring international law and the like.

Now, I have to say that the reason the young are liberal is they don't have money. They don't worry about taxes. Thats the sole reason.

is any bush choice for anything acceptable to you?

Moderateman

on Jan 11, 2005

Reply #16 By: Heydre (Anonymous) - 1/11/2005 11:13:19 PM
If you'd have listened to your teachers more closely you'd be able to spell......sorry but it's hard to read any argument when basic spelling is ignored.

Whom are you typing to? I believe you must have a subject for your post to make any sense. If you would have listened to your teachers more you would have known this.

Heydre

on Jan 12, 2005

MM,

I believe what you meant to say was "I know you are but what am I."

Moderateman

on Jan 12, 2005

Reply By: Heydre(Anonymous User)Posted: Wednesday, January 12, 2005MM,I believe what you meant to say was "I know you are but what am I."

Drawing conclusions with no facts or information is truely to be ignorant...Also do not presume to begin to think you have a grasp on my thoughts or how I formulate decisions.

Very simply I was asking "to whom your reply and accusations were aimed at, its really very simple question.
There is nothing arcane nor covert in my question.

On a side note, never have a battle of wits with someone when you come half prepared.

Moderateman

on Jan 12, 2005

Reply By: latour999Posted: Tuesday, January 11, 2005Now, I have to say that the reason the young are liberal is they don't have money. They don't worry about taxes. Thats the sole reason. But there is a difference between liberal with money (socialist) and socially liberal (pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, etc.)

and that difference would be?

This is not a challange, I just want to see your point of view on this , ok?

Zoomba

on Jan 12, 2005

In my mind the difference is..
Economic Liberal - Spend money on social programs like welfare, social security, food stamps etc... This is the camp that very much pushes for big government to catch those that fall through the cracks (at times regardless of why they fell through). I lump Affirmative Action in this category as it's largely an economic initiative.

Social Liberal - Pushes more for personal freedoms in personal choices. Pro-choice and pro-gay marraige are more movements to remove restrictions that more conservative people are trying to place on social institutions and personal health choices. The more reasonable people in this category tend to fall more libertarian in their expectation that government leave well enough alone.

I personally consider myself economically conservative (though I still question Reganomics) but socially liberal. In my opinion we need to place more responsibility for peoples life situations (education, income etc) in the hands of the people themselves. Get them to have a greater sense of self-responsibility and more self-empowered. In terms of social stuff, I think that 99% of the things people are screaming and crying about as potential causes for the downfall of society are ridiculous. We heard the same thing about the radio, about rock and roll, about television, about movies... now video games, gay marraige etc... Society is still chugging along just fine. People overreact and we shouldn't make laws based on such reactions. As long as it doesn't hurt others in a real and direct way, I don't care what anyone does.

Note: The differences I draw are not based on the types of liberals most people on this site seem to want to portray as being representative of ALL liberals. Lately there has been a very strong backlash against the extreme left, and many bloggers write as if they're describing the ENTIRE left. We're not all like that. Many of us are quite reasonable and have good reasons for our stances on current issues. My definitions are based on what I've seen of other more reasonable liberals.

Moderateman

on Jan 12, 2005

Reply #24 By: Zoomba - 1/12/2005 12:30:33 PM

I thank you for the clarification. btw I agree with most of your post. btw, a reasonable liberal is really a moderate democrat.

Zoomba

on Jan 12, 2005

That's sort of like saying a reasonable conservative is a moderate republican. It's an over-simplification of an entire half of the political spectrum. You can be reasonable and be a fair bit off of center on either side. The difference between the reasonable and the extreme are the manner in which they reach their conclusions and how they react to opposing views. I know many people who are very very liberal but entirely reasonable about it. They also don't go nuts on the opposition like the extremists being cited in many recent articles on here are.

Moderateman

on Jan 12, 2005

Reply By: ZoombaPosted: Wednesday, January 12, 2005That's sort of like saying a reasonable conservative is a moderate republican. It's an over-simplification of an entire half of the political spectrum. You can be reasonable and be a fair bit off of center on either side. The difference between the reasonable and the extreme are the manner in which they reach their conclusions and how they react to opposing views. I know many people who are very very liberal but entirely reasonable about it. They also don't go nuts on the opposition like the extremists being cited in many recent articles on here are.

I agree!!!

Moderateman

on Jan 12, 2005

Reply By: Helix the IIPosted: Wednesday, January 12, 2005What is remarkable is humanity as individuals, we treat many..many.. people the same way Bush haters treat him. We get it into our head that we just don't like someone and cruxify them as often as humanly possible. From that guy in the office you sneer at to the woman in the women's restrooms who uses the last toliet paper. Heh Left or right.

point taken.... I might be a little over zealous in condeming the entire left..

stevendedalus

on Jan 12, 2005

Hannity is notorious for inviting leftist strawmen. That teacher does not represent me, nor the left. He sounds like a kook and won't last in the school system.

Moderateman

on Jan 12, 2005

Reply By: stevendedalusPosted: Wednesday, January 12, 2005Hannity is notorious for inviting leftist strawmen. That teacher does not represent me, nor the left. He sounds like a kook and won't last in the school system.

he has tenure steven, there impossable to get rid of with tenure... but I agree he issa kook, and I do not believe for one second he represents the entire left..

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!