America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
Have a leg up on America
Published on November 30, 2008 By Moderateman In Politics

After being captured fighting with Taliban forces against Americans in 2001, Abdullah Massoud was sent to Guantanamo, where the one-legged terrorist was fitted with a special prosthetic leg, at a cost of $50,000-$75,000 to the U.S. taxpayer. Under the Americans With Disabilities Act, Massoud would now be able to park his car bomb in a handicapped parking space!

Remember now he is supposed to be tortured according to the Far left, while American veterans cannot get a new pair of glasses this terrorists gets a new leg, is released and then goes back to Afghanistan to wage war against the same people he got his leg from, his new leg did not stop him from kidnapping Chinese dam builders and killing Americans, actually it made him a folk hero, this "brave man, this freedom fighter" fighting for freedom against the very people that so cruelly gave him a new leg. What beasts we Americans are for doing that!

Natuarly no mention of his new leg was seen in Americas papers or the main stream media as it would go against Bush as the monster, it might actually show Bush and his right on decision to detain some terrorist was GASPPPPPPP!!!!! the right thing to do!! Well now the left and its supporters the MSM cannot have that can they?


Comments (Page 1)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Nov 30, 2008

Natuarly no mention of his new leg was seen in Americas papers or the main stream media as it would go against Bush as the monster, it might actually show Bush and his right on decision to detain some terrorist was GASPPPPPPP!!!!! the right thing to do!! Well now the left and its supporters the MSM cannot have that can they?

I'm not across this story, but which news outlet did release the information about his artificial leg?

on Nov 30, 2008

The "article link takes us to Amazon.com' marketplace for an Ann Coulter book.

 

Further Googling revealed the story posted on Coulter's blog.

on Dec 01, 2008

cactoblasta
Natuarly no mention of his new leg was seen in Americas papers or the main stream media as it would go against Bush as the monster, it might actually show Bush and his right on decision to detain some terrorist was GASPPPPPPP!!!!! the right thing to do!! Well now the left and its supporters the MSM cannot have that can they?I'm not across this story, but which news outlet did release the information about his artificial leg?

Ann Coulter revealed the story.

on Dec 01, 2008

Sodaiho
The "article link takes us to Amazon.com' marketplace for an Ann Coulter book. Further Googling revealed the story posted on Coulter's blog.

Sorry about that I really thought the link was to the story, not to some sales pitch.

on Dec 01, 2008

Just one of the untold stories that dont fit the agenda.

Unless Obama decides not to close it immediately.

on Dec 01, 2008

Dr Guy
Just one of the untold stories that don't fit the agenda.Unless Obama decides not to close it immediately.

Just another example of how the MSM has kept America blind to anything Good done by the Bush administration, even the most avid Bush hater could see this was a kindness repaid with American blood in the end, but will the farleft ever admit it? hell no!

on Dec 01, 2008

Just wish their prisoners (US and coalition soldiers) were treated as well, wait that's right, they're usually not prisoners for long... before they are killed and mutilated. Now I'm all for being "better? than the other guy, but when the MSM makes our troops out to be the monsters, encourages the embellished victimization of enemy combatants and fails to report almost any positive news, they nullify any of the "winning of hearts and minds" in the Middle East for the sake of politics at home. I'm totally disgusted about it. Not too long ago this would be considered treason now it's called change.

on Dec 02, 2008

As an old Marine would say, "Hell, we don't take no prisoners." Much cleaner that way.

on Dec 02, 2008

Ann Coulter revealed the story.

Right, and then you plagiarised your opening paragraph.

I haven't been able to find a reputable news site with this story, nor could I find the articles quoted on Lexisnet (which I assume is where you got your opener).

Still, the American government clearly didn't have a case, or they would have tried him. As it happens, they stuffed up somewhere and he's returned to his rabble-rousing ways. But the least they could do for keeping him imprisoned for years without charge is give him a new leg.

They're lucky they can't be sued. A US criminal would have the right to do so.

on Dec 02, 2008

As an old Marine would say, "Hell, we don't take no prisoners." Much cleaner that way.

Geeze, using Napalm bombs and now  "taking no prisoners"

Are you sure youre a liberal?

on Dec 02, 2008

Anthony R

As an old Marine would say, "Hell, we don't take no prisoners." Much cleaner that way.
Geeze, using Napalm bombs and now  "taking no prisoners"

Are you sure youre a liberal?

 

whats wrong with napalm?

on Dec 02, 2008

Nitro Cruiser
Just wish their prisoners (US and coalition soldiers) were treated as well, wait that's right, they're usually not prisoners for long... before they are killed and mutilated. Now I'm all for being "better? than the other guy, but when the MSM makes our troops out to be the monsters, encourages the embellished victimization of enemy combatants and fails to report almost any positive news, they nullify any of the "winning of hearts and minds" in the Middle East for the sake of politics at home. I'm totally disgusted about it. Not too long ago this would be considered treason now it's called change.

Sadly the MSM has America painted as monsters world wide. while America treats her prisoners far better than any other country on the planet, you would not know it to read about it in the MSM,.

on Dec 02, 2008

stevendedalus
As an old Marine would say, "Hell, we don't take no prisoners." Much cleaner that way.

I am an Old Marine and Use to take prisoners.

on Dec 02, 2008

cactoblasta
Ann Coulter revealed the story.Right, and then you plagiarised your opening paragraph.I haven't been able to find a reputable news site with this story, nor could I find the articles quoted on Lexisnet (which I assume is where you got your opener).Still, the American government clearly didn't have a case, or they would have tried him. As it happens, they stuffed up somewhere and he's returned to his rabble-rousing ways. But the least they could do for keeping him imprisoned for years without charge is give him a new leg.They're lucky they can't be sued. A US criminal would have the right to do so.

Obviously if I sent you a link to the site I was not trying to hide the fact I took a paragraph in total, why did you feel it was necessary to point it out?

He was a terrorist and finally was killed for his acts of terror. that in of itself is proof enough.

on Dec 02, 2008

whats wrong with napalm?

It's now a banned weapon.

3 Pages1 2 3