America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
An Original thought would cause him to have a brain melt down!
Published on April 11, 2008 By Moderateman In Politics

This is why An Empty Suit Like Barak Hussein Obama appears to be such a powerful speaker! He has done his home work, or has more than likely had his lackeys do it for him and has copied the speaking patterns of four of the most powerful speakers of the last 65 years. The only Powerful speaker he left out was Adolph Hitler, but I am sure if he thought he could get away with it he would have used Adolf as a role model too!.

Basically he is much like the dummy a ventriloquist holds on his lap while the man does the speaking. If he had an original thought I believe his brain would explode.

1. Hold Out Hope

Like Winston Churchill, Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, and Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama speaks in the uplifting rhetoric of hope. After his defeat in New Hampshire, Obama’s political oratory was so hopeful he sounded more like a winner than a runner–up. Obama knew a hopeful message would embolden his supporters. In a speech on Jan. 8, 2008, Obama said, “We know the battle ahead will be long. But always remember, no matter what obstacles stand in our way, nothing can stand in the way of the power of millions of voices calling for change… We have been warned against offering the people of this nation false hope. But in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope.” Except when you are running on a platform of pie in the sky politics.

You are the leader people want to believe in. Your customers and employees are bombarded by bad news – the credit crunch, a housing slump, an economic slowdown – but they are eager to hear something positive. That doesn’t mean leaders stick their heads in the sand – far from it. Inspiring leaders acknowledge the situation but also remind people of reasons to be optimistic.

2. Use Rhetorical Devices

Many observers say Obama sounds like King. This is because he uses some of the same techniques that made King an electrifying speaker. Barak Obama is not fit to scratch Kings butt, and King was a liar himself, King for one was not a dr. of anything. His name was not even Martin Luther. King also ripped off the " I have a dream speech" from another pastor!

Parallel structure. We can thank the ancient Greeks for this rhetorical tool – they called it “anaphora.” It simply means repeating the same word or expression at the beginning of successive sentences or phrases. One of the most famous examples is King’s “I Have a Dream” speech. “I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed…. I have a dream that… I have a dream…” Obama uses the same device frequently. In his Iowa victory speech on Jan. 3, Obama said, “You have done what the cynics said we couldn’t do. You have done what the state of New Hampshire can do in five days. You have done what America can do in this new year.”

Anaphora’s sister technique is called “epistrophe.” It is the repetition of a word or expression at the end of successive sentences or phrases. For example, in Obama’s New Hampshire speech, the expression “Yes, we can” rallied thousands of supporters when used like this, “It was a creed written into the founding documents that declared the destiny of a nation: Yes, we can. It was whispered by slaves and abolitionists as they blazed a trail towards freedom through the darkest of nights: Yes, we can. It was sung by immigrants as they struck out for distant shores and pioneers who pushed westward against an unforgiving wilderness: Yes, we can.”

Alliteration. Both Kennedy and King were fond of this device that strings together words starting with similar sounds. At the 2004 Democratic National Convention keynote speech that brought Obama to prominence, he said, “Do we participate in a politics of cynicism or do we participate in a politics of hope?” In 2005, during a commencement speech at Knox College, Obama described America as “a place where destiny was not a destination, but a journey to be shared and shaped…” When speaking at the Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars in August, 2006, Obama proclaimed, “The history of America is one of tragedy turned into triumph.” In January’s New Hampshire speech, Obama used alliteration again: “We have been told we cannot do this by a chorus of cynics.” My Sentence would be " We have been lied to by the leader of losers"

Rich Imagery. Persuasive speakers have long understood the power of imagery to stir emotions – the creation of mental pictures through the words. In his 2004 speech, Obama described what he meant by the audacity of hope: “It’s the hope of slaves sitting around a fire singing freedom songs, the hope of immigrants setting out for distant shores, the hope of a young naval lieutenant bravely patrolling the Mekong Delta, the hope of a mill worker's son who dares to defy the odds, the hope of a skinny kid with a funny name who believes that America has a place for him, too.”

3. Exude Confidence

In debates Obama appears unflappable, answering tough questions while maintaining strong eye contact. He doesn’t fidget or shake his head when listening to sharp attacks from his opponents. While seated, he leans slightly forward. People will make an impression of you after only a few seconds. Pay attention to what your body is saying. Communicate confidence, competence, and control. He has been schooled well, I wonder how much money he spent on trying to appear as though he is cool under pressure? I would like to see a debate with heart and blood pressure machines hooked up to the candidates so we can really see who maintains their cool and who is just APPEARING TO BE COOL!

4. Use Dynamic Vocal Delivery

A monotonous speaking style lulls the listener to sleep, regardless of the power of the content. Obama knows how to enhance his delivery. Consider these three aspects of his delivery.

Pacing. Obama varies the speed at which he speaks. Very few sentences are delivered at exactly the same pace.

Volume. In his victory speech after the Iowa caucuses, Obama raised the volume of his speech with each sentence in the following paragraph: “We are one nation. We are one people. And our time for change has come.” Each sentence slightly louder than the one preceding it.

Pauses. Nothing is as dramatic as a well–placed pause, and Obama knows it. He pauses at key moments to make a memorable impact. If only he would pause, period!


Comments (Page 11)
12 PagesFirst 9 10 11 12 
on Apr 25, 2008
Yes, did you understand the question?


Wait, now I'm confused. History 101 isn't enough? You need written documentation that McCarthy
A) existed
was a Republican
C) falsely accused people of being Communist
D) Condemned people for their political beliefs
E) was censured by Congress for conduct unbecoming a senator and finally
F) Scared America into a crazed witch hunt for years?????

Wow, here I was, thinking that I knew less than all of you political crazies and yet not a one of you know what has happened in recent American history!

I feel smart.
on Apr 26, 2008
CEDARBIRD POSTS:
Two words:

Joseph McCarthy

DRGUY POSTS:
Yes, did you understand the question?


CEDARBIRD POSTS: Wait, now I'm confused. History 101 isn't enough? You need written documentation that McCarthy
A) existed
was a Republican
C) falsely accused people of being Communist
D) Condemned people for their political beliefs
E) was censured by Congress for conduct unbecoming a senator and finally
F) Scared America into a crazed witch hunt for years?????

Wow, here I was, thinking that I knew less than all of you political crazies and yet not a one of you know what has happened in recent American history!


Any questions?


Hi Cedarbird,

Ya, I have a few questions.

Seems as though political correctness has hit college history courses...the ritual flogging of McCarthy continues..

Are you aware that back in 2003 new information arising from the release of the secret files from the early 50's sheds new light on Sen. McCarthy?

Was America gripped by a McCarthy induced "hysteria"?

McCarthy's career as an anti-Communist began in Feb. 1950 with his Wheeling speech and was effectively ended in with his censure in Dec. 1954. Why was Harry Truman chased out of Washington in 1952 with an approval rating of 23%? Why did Joe McCarthy enjoy a 50-29 favorable rating as late as Jan. 1954?

I'll give you a hint...Joe was right and his enemies were wrong.

How about this one?

Was McCarthy right that FDR and the New Dealers were as soft on Stalin as Neville Chamberlain had been on Hitler?








on Apr 26, 2008
Two words:

Joseph McCarthy


Any questions?


Yeah, I have a question for you.
If Senator McCarthy was so bad why did you not include his biggest backer and helper? Senator John F. Kennedy, or Senator McCarthy’s staff lawyer Robert F. Kennedy? You know the guy that dug up the dirt and pointed fingers at possible contenders to the presidency to clear the way for his big brother.
on Apr 26, 2008
If Senator McCarthy was so bad why did you not include his biggest backer and helper? Senator John F. Kennedy,


Oh, that's easy. I omitted information to prove my point. Politicians do it all the time. Especially a certain one who shall remain nameless. It's the American way, right?

Oh, and though I don't have documents, I do have a friend who was questioned by the secret service for helping to organize and anti-Bush rally in California.

"Are you now, or have you ever been a...terrorist!?!?!?!?!"

Ah, history and the repetition thereof.

Okay, I'm really done now. So when I don't respond, it's simply because I haven't read your comment because I'm not going to.
on Apr 26, 2008
The most ethically challenged Democratic congress in history remains immeasurably more moral than the least ethically challenged republican congress in history.


Wait, now I'm confused. History 101 isn't enough? You need written documentation that McCarthy


You did not understand the question. Perhaps English 101 is for you. Look again at his claim. "The Most Ethically Challenged" vs the "least ethically challenged". Now for the key word. CONGRESS - not congressman (which McCarthy would not have been anyway), or Senator (which he would have been), but CONGRESS.

Now do you want to retract your non-sequitar?
on Apr 26, 2008
and yet not a one of you know what has happened in recent American history!


No, you just dont understand the written word.
on Apr 26, 2008
Wow, here I was, thinking that I knew less than all of you political crazies and yet not a one of you know what has happened in recent American history!


Cedarbird,
Regarding McCarthy, I can assure you that if you seek the truthful answers to those questions I raised in post 152, you too will know what has happened in recent AMerican history.

Right now, at least on this, you are just following the politically correct herd.

on Apr 26, 2008
Cedarbird,
Regarding McCarthy


Also, point number 2. If you want to go by congressMAN instead of congress, and include Senators in that bunch, please now prove that McCarthy was THE MOST ETHICAL

the least ethically challenged republican


Republican in congress in the history of this country. (DOnt forget to include Lincoln).

Least ethically challenged = most ethical in PC speak.

Point #3 (should you choose to accept the challenge): After proving point number 2, then prove how all the democrat congressmen that went to jail are more ethical than any republican in the history of this country. Also, all democrat congressmen that did not go to jail.
on Apr 26, 2008
Oh, that's easy. I omitted information to prove my point. Politicians do it all the time. Especially a certain one who shall remain nameless. It's the American way, right?


Are you a politician? Outside of politics what you did would be called a lie.
Oh, and though I don't have documents, I do have a friend who was questioned by the secret service for helping to organize and anti-Bush rally in California.


I had a father who lost his job because of McCarthy. Took him three years to get back on the NYPD. The secret service does that with anyone and every organization pro or con to the current president. It is called standard operating procedure. If the president is coming to town all people with a criminal record that says anything bad about the president gets questioned buy the police, the more serious offenders are questioned by the Secret Service. If an organization is anti the president then they check it out. How is it you equate the safeguarding of our national leader with what McCarthy did? Or is this another lie or omission of facts to prove your point?

Okay, I'm really done now. So when I don't respond, it's simply because I haven't read your comment because I'm not going to.


How insulting. Well the rest of us will enjoy putting you on the list of people like col Gene.
on Apr 26, 2008
Okay, I'm really done now. So when I don't respond, it's simply because I haven't read your comment because I'm not going to.


A shame, because it is leaving you looking stupid since you evidently did not understand the question the first time around.
on Apr 26, 2008
This is liberal bravery we call it cowardice!   
on Apr 27, 2008

The_Politico
LIBERALS L0VE SPENDING MONEY AS LONG AS IT IS NOT THERE OWN MONEYAnd liberals know the difference between "there" and "their".

another typical Liberal trick, find a mistake in sentence structure or spelling and concentrate on that instead of the sentence itself. I smell weakness over there, but I am sure the weakness it coming from over their {you}

on Apr 27, 2008

The_Politico
So much for the most ethical Congress in history,The most ethically challenged Democratic congress in history remains immeasurably more moral than the least ethically challenged republican congress in history.

Such as refusing to even hear subjects that cast aspersions on members of their own party?

Such as covering up 70,000 dollars found in a freezer by a leading Democrat?

Such as demanding wind power, till it ruined Drunken Ted and Bobby Kennedy's view of Chesapeake Bay?

on Apr 27, 2008

Cedarbird
Prove it. Statements of fact should be easily proved. So provide it.Two words:Joseph McCarthyAny questions?

Here we agree, Joe was and is forever a blight on the Parties name

on May 05, 2008
Here we agree, Joe was and is forever a blight on the Parties name


MM, as I pointed out that the democrats were also involved in that witch hunt and as soon as things turned sour the slipped into the shadows and hid. Robert F. Kennedy was Senator McCarthy’s official attorney in this mess yet he came out with clean hands.
12 PagesFirst 9 10 11 12