America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
Liberals set to throw gala party
Published on August 13, 2007 By Moderateman In US Domestic

Karl rove the man that has defeated the Democrats time and time again, finally lost in 2007, when the Republicans lost both house to the democrats, who really knows how this will turn out as the Congress has a 9% approval rating in some polls and as high as 21% in some others.

Maybe Karl threw the 2007 race to give the America public a taste of what life will be like under the Democrats, who knows? surely I don't, neither do you.

the following is from Michele Malkin:

\

The President is talking about Rove’s family “making huge sacrifices. We’re going to be friends for a long time. I would call Karl Rove a dear friend…I thank my friend for making a tremendous sacrifice. Wish you all the very best. I’ll be on the road behind you soon.:

Rove speaks: He’s “grateful to have been a witness to history. It has been a joy and honor. Praises Bush for putting America on a war footing. I’ve seen a reformer…We’ve been at this a long time.”

(Rove is choked up.)

“Right time to start thinking about the next chapter of my family’s life…now is the time. I will deeply miss my work here…looking forward to continuing our friendship of 34 years…I will ask for God’s gifts of eternal strength and..Thank you again for this extraordinary opportunity.”

Hug. Depart.

Rove was much more articulate and emotional than Bush, FWIW.

Fox News Channel’s E.D. Hill notes the curious playing of the “family” card…Rove’s son is going off to college. “I’m not sure how many kids going off to college have time for more ‘family’ time.” Now, there’s on-air banter about which campaign Rove’s headed to: Thompson or Giuliani?

***

Well, isn’t this interesting news to greet us on a Monday morning in the dog days of August:

Karl Rove, President Bush’s longtime political adviser, is resigning as White House deputy chief of staff effective Aug. 31, and returning to Texas, he said in an interview with Paul Gigot, editor of The Wall Street Journal’s editorial page.

Mr. Rove, who has held a senior post in the White House since President Bush took office in January 2001, told Mr. Gigot he first floated the idea of leaving a year ago. But he delayed his departure as, first, Democrats took Congress, and then as the White House tackled debates on immigration and Iraq, he said. He said he decided to leave after White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten told senior aides that if they stayed past Labor Day they would be obliged to remain through the end of the president’s term in January 2009.

“I just think it’s time,” Mr. Rove said in the interview. “There’s always something that can keep you here, and as much as I’d like to be here, I’ve got to do this for the sake of my family.” Mr. Rove and his wife have a home in Ingram, Texas, and a son who attends college in nearby San Antonio.

Gigot’s interview is titled “The Mark of Rove.” Gigot lets Rove defend himself and his legacy, and what I see, alas, is the mark of self-delusion and blindness that has damaged the White House and the Beltway GOP. Rove pats President Bush (and himself) on the back for the disastrous Medicare entitlement expansion and the aborted Social Security reform effort. We get this admission: “His biggest error, Mr. Rove says, was in not working soon enough to replace Republicans tainted by scandal.” And then this:

As for what his own White House mistakes have been, Mr. Rove winces and says, “I’ll put my feet up in September and think about that.”

The Left will harp on Plameout. John Little rounds-up reaction and fresh conspiracy theories from the far Left.

But here’s what I find striking about Rove’s exit interview:

Not a word here about the Harriet Miers debacle, the botching of the Dubai ports battle, or the undeniable stumbles in post-Iraq invasion policies.

And not a word about the spectacular disaster of the illegal alien shamnesty, which will be the everlasting stain Rove leaves behind.

I repeat from the WSJ news article:

“Mr. Rove, who has held a senior post in the White House since President Bush took office in January 2001, told Mr. Gigot he first floated the idea of leaving a year ago.”

GOOD LUCK MR. Rove may you enjoy your retirement and make tons of money on the book that is sure to follow!


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Aug 13, 2007
well geeze I thought the liberals here would be throwing a party now that public enemy number three was leaving. I guess I was wrong.
on Aug 13, 2007
Nah, this doesn't suit them at all. They didn't want him gone, they wanted him branded and shamed. Instead he will always be the big fish that got away.
on Aug 13, 2007
(Citizen)ParaTed2kAugust 13, 2007 15:09:41


Nah, this doesn't suit them at all. They didn't want him gone, they wanted him branded and shamed. Instead he will always be the big fish that got away.


hopefully he will choose one of the leading candidates like Fred Thompson or Rudi and guide them to victory. Now that would really make the left more insane than they already are.
on Aug 13, 2007

Rove, like Alberto Gonzales, can leave or stay and it won't change things one little bit as the liberals will still be unhappy with whomever comes in and replaces them.

I wish this were true:

hopefully he will choose one of the leading candidates like Fred Thompson or Rudi and guide them to victory. Now that would really make the left more insane than they already are.

... but I expect Rove is going to be done with politics for a while.  At least one election cycle worth, if not more.

On the other hand, he could wind up as a talkin' head on some of the network news shows, doing political analysis ala James Carville.  After a while of doing that, he'd probably get back into things himself as he realizes that most mere mortals can't do the job as well as he had been.

on Aug 13, 2007

Rove had nothing to do with the win of the Democrats in 2006. The reason Congress is unable to move the way most Americans want is because of Bush and the GOP that continue to support this looser. The 2008 election will finish what started in 2006 with a Democrat elected President and more of a shift toward the Democrats in both the House and Senate. The changes the public wants will start January 2009.
on Aug 13, 2007
The changes the public wants will start January 2009.


Right. Which is why the Democrat led House and Senate has a high approval rating!

Oh, wait, it doesn't. Col. Gene's speaking out the sphincter again!
on Aug 13, 2007
(Citizen)terpfan1980August 13, 2007 15:43:50


I wish this were true:
hopefully he will choose one of the leading candidates like Fred Thompson or Rudi and guide them to victory. Now that would really make the left more insane than they already are.


this might be a strong possibility. We can only hope.

On the other hand, he could wind up as a talkin' head on some of the network news shows, doing political analysis ala James Carville. After a while of doing that, he'd probably get back into things himself as he realizes that most mere mortals can't do the job as well as he had been.


Geeeze I hope not, maybe he could revive air America hahahahahahah

on Aug 13, 2007
(Citizen)COL GeneAugust 13, 2007 17:32:25


Rove had nothing to do with the win of the Democrats in 2006. The reason Congress is unable to move the way most Americans want is because of Bush and the GOP that continue to support this looser. The 2008 election will finish what started in 2006 with a Democrat elected President and more of a shift toward the Democrats in both the House and Senate. The changes the public wants will start January 2009.


I have it on good Intel that the plan was to let the Dems win in an off election so they could self destruct, it looks like the plan is working, as the demos have done nothing to speak of in Congress except to obstruct, whine, complain and still blame the republicans. The American people have woken up and seen the light watching the Dems fill their pockets with pork, pork and more pork, watched them break laws with 90, 000 in Frozen assets hahahahah and nothing being done about it, watched Murtha threaten another Congressman and get away with it, Watched Reid declare the war is lost while we are still fighting, watched Pelosi make nice with a country that sponsors terrorist and hates America, face it Gene the Dems had a chance and blew it, look for a Republican President and the Republicans to take back the Senate and the house. The people of America rate the entire democratic Congress with an approval rating LOWER that President Bush, something you keep harping on how bad his approval rating are.
on Aug 13, 2007
(Citizen)Gideon MacLeishAugust 13, 2007 17:44:11


The changes the public wants will start January 2009.


Right. Which is why the Democrat led House and Senate has a high approval rating!

Oh, wait, it doesn't. Col. Gene's speaking out the sphincter again!


would you expect any less from a dyed in the wool undercover LIBERAL in disguse as a Moderate Republican? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAA he is about as much republican as I am African American.
on Aug 13, 2007
Reply By: Gideon MacLeish Posted: Monday, August 13, 2007
“The changes the public wants will start January 2009.


Right. Which is why the Democrat led House and Senate has a high approval rating! “


That is because the Democrats are being prevented at every turn from doing the things the public wants by Bush and the GOP support in Congress. So long as Bush will Veto bills passed by Congress and the GOP refuses to override the Bush Veto, the Democrats can not make the changes that the voters want and hoped they would get after the 2006 election. It will take one more election in 2008!
on Aug 13, 2007
(Citizen)COL GeneAugust 13, 2007 18:13:39


Right. Which is why the Democrat led House and Senate has a high approval rating! “


That is because the Democrats are being prevented at every turn from doing the things the public wants by Bush and the GOP support in Congress. So long as Bush will Veto bills passed by Congress and the GOP refuses to override the Bush Veto, the Democrats can not make the changes that the voters want and hoped they would get after the 2006 election. It will take one more election in 2008!


I noticed you did not address a single thing I wrote, but this is typical of you gene when confronted by the truth, change the topic or ignore the comment. Something the democrats excel at.
on Aug 13, 2007
“I noticed you did not address a single thing I wrote, but this is typical of you gene when confronted by the truth, change the topic or ignore the comment. Something the democrats excel at.”

I addressed the issue you just do not like the answer. If Congress had made the changes that most Americans want and voted for in 2006, Congress would have a much different approval rating. What is preventing the Democrats from making the changes people want is Bush and the GOP in Congress that will not follow what the majority want to happen.
on Aug 13, 2007
The American people have woken up and seen the light watching the Dems fill their pockets with pork, pork and more pork, watched them break laws with 90, 000 in Frozen assets hahahahah and nothing being done about it, watched Murtha threaten another Congressman and get away with it, Watched Reid declare the war is lost while we are still fighting, watched Pelosi make nice with a country that sponsors terrorist and hates America, face it Gene the Dems had a chance and blew it, look for a Republican President and the Republicans to take back the Senate and the house. The people of America rate the entire democratic Congress with an approval rating LOWER that President Bush, something you keep harping on how bad his approval rating are.


(Citizen)COL GeneAugust 13, 2007 19:29:05


there gene I reprinted what I said so you can address this, not some other issue you think I said. I can write it in much smaller words if you cannot understand what I just wrote, or maybe I can learn to write in Farsi, so you will feel more at home.
on Aug 13, 2007
ColGene, you're still arguing that the Legistlative Branch does nothing but sit around waiting for word from the White House? You sang that tune while the Republicans ran Congress, and you were wrong then... Now that the Democrats run Congress you are still singing off key.

The Democrats run every commitee now. They control what gets floor time and what doesn't. There aren't enough Republicans in key leadership positions to stop them from anything.

To me the approval ratings really don't mean much, but you and the Democrats have spent so much time pointing out Bush's approval rating that you can't just shrug them off now. Congress's piss poor approval rating has nothing to do with Prs. Bush or the Republicans in the House and Senate. It has everythign to do with the fact that they have yet to even set an agenda or policy, much less worked against the White House to get anything done.

In other words, the biggest waste of money hasn't been the pork or the war, it has been paying the Senators, Representatives and their staffs for them to do absolutely nothing.

You should recognize what it's like to get a paycheck to do nothing, you did it your whole military career.
on Aug 14, 2007
Rove had nothing to do with the win of the Democrats in 2006. The reason Congress is unable to move the way most Americans want is because of Bush and the GOP that continue to support this looser. The 2008 election will finish what started in 2006 with a Democrat elected President and more of a shift toward the Democrats in both the House and Senate. The changes the public wants will start January 2009.


The reason Congress doesn't accomplish anything is their are so obsessed with manufactured scandals and useless investigations into Bush and his cabinet, that they can't get anything done.  I love how you want a completely democrat controlled government while always screaming about Republicans have too much power. 


the Democrats can not make the changes that the voters want and hoped they would get after the 2006 election. It will take one more election in 2008!


Ah yes, gene and his "what Americans want" nonsense again.


2 Pages1 2