America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
The Devourer
Published on June 26, 2007 By Moderateman In Democrat

A women in Charge, Carl Bernstein's biography of Hillary Clinton. This is not a favorable portrait of Hillary.

As a result, it's pretty safe to say the central question facing Democratic voters in the presidential primaries is: which candidate will be most effective at rolling back the Bush years? On issue after issue, the Democratic contenders are doing everything they can to highlight their differences with Bush. As usual the Democrats offer nothing of any value except to say except "I am not Bush" "Bush is bad" "Bush is wrong" well kiddies from the left Bush is not running in case you have not noticed yet. Wake-up and start offering some solution to major problems that make sense besides "raising taxes" "more entitlements"

But when it comes to the issue of secrecy and an administration operating in the shadows, there's an argument to be made that the candidate least likely to turn on the lights is Hillary Clinton. Her lifelong commitment to secrecy is one of the main themes of Bernstein's book.

"Hillary Rodham Clinton has always had a difficult relationship with the truth,"{read she is a big fathead liar} writes Bernstein. "She has often chosen to obfuscate, omit, and avoid. It is an understatement by now that she has been known to apprehend truths about herself and the events of her life that others do not exactly share." Selective memory is what I call it and somehow Hillary always comes out smelling like a rose instead of the fertilizer that makes the roses grow.

Or, as Bernstein summed it up on the Today Show, "This is a woman who led a camouflaged life and continues to."

It's not just that she's a private person. There are plenty of public servants who are zealous about guarding their personal lives and equally zealous about keeping their public lives -- and public policies -- transparent. But, like Bush and Cheney, Clinton seems devoted to secrecy for its own sake.

As Bernstein shows, what was most shocking about her handling of the health care fiasco during her husband's administration wasn't that she kept the plan secret from its critics, but that she kept it secret even from those who would have been champions of the plan had they known anything about it.

This passion for concealment is a pattern that, as Bernstein demonstrates, has been repeated throughout Clinton's life. It was there in the head-scratching decision to hide her college thesis from public view because it was about radical organizer Saul Alinsky. It was there in her refusal for 30 years to admit that she had failed the bar exam the first time she took it. It was there in the way she glossed over in her memoir her summer internship at the law firm of Treuhaft, Walker, and Burnstein -- one of the most renowned left-wing law firms in the nation. It was there in the way she handled the Whitewater and Travelgate investigations, which, as Bernstein told me, "ended up unnecessarily prolonging them."

Bernstein quotes Clinton lawyer Mark Fabiani as saying of Hillary and Whitewater: "She would do anything to get out of the situation. And if that involved not being forthcoming [in releasing documents and other materials] she herself would say, 'I have a reason for not being forthcoming.'" And he reports that then-White House advisor George Stephanopoulos described Hillary's responses to the various scandals of the Clinton presidency as "Jesuitical lying."

"Hillary Clinton and her advisers apparently don't want people to know her real story," Carl Bernstein told me. "That is particularly sad because the authentic picture of her life is so much more compelling than the tired, airbrushed, and sanitized version they keep serving up and refining. The campaign's official response to A Woman in Charge -- even before they had seen the book -- is the kind of thing I would have expected from the Nixon White House or the Bush White House, not a Clinton presidential campaign committed to a new openness and transparency."

On the campaign trail, Clinton talks a lot about her experience in the White House -- clearly we're meant to factor those eight years in when evaluating her fitness to return. But reading the Bernstein book made me feel like she has taken away all the wrong lessons about being in power. Her tendency to hide and obfuscate appears to be a learned behavior.

So the question facing Democrats -- and, indeed, the country -- is whether we want another presidency cloaked in secrecy, deception, and denial.

If I had to chose I would vote for any other Democratic candidate BUT Hillary Clinton who I believe is corrupt, power hungry and will take the country in the wrong direction.

  I used many quotes from several articles I read for information, I have not sourced the articles I got the information from because I did not want to make my article look like some kind of thesis.

 


Comments (Page 1)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Jun 26, 2007

Come on Hillary supporters, where are you???? where are the counter arguments? Nothing to say? or can it be this article is just so right on the money there can be no argument?

on Jun 26, 2007
Not quite a supporter, but let me give you a more cynical approach to this.

As the author said: Selective memory is what I call it and somehow Hillary always comes out smelling like a rose instead of the fertilizer that makes the roses grow.

Now, most people believe that government is hiding things, and that there is a certain amount of corruption, so the question is, which would you rather have in charge, a person who appears the fool and says "I am not a crook", or the person smart enough and slick enough not to get caught?

If everyone lies, wouldn't you want a successful liar in your corner?

IG

on Jun 26, 2007
She will get caught. There's no doubt about that. But if she can push through legislation we don't really want, that's going to be a big problem for me. If she can do it quickly and quietly, I don't want her. Legislation should be loud and clear.
on Jun 26, 2007

Reply By: InfoGeekPosted: Tuesday, June 26, 2007
Not quite a supporter, but let me give you a more cynical approach to this.

As the author said: Selective memory is what I call it and somehow Hillary always comes out smelling like a rose instead of the fertilizer that makes the roses grow.

Now, most people believe that government is hiding things, and that there is a certain amount of corruption, so the question is, which would you rather have in charge, a person who appears the fool and says "I am not a crook", or the person smart enough and slick enough not to get caught?

If everyone lies, wouldn't you want a successful liar in your corner?

IG

NO! I am tired of secrets in Government. Be it Bush and Cheney, or the Democrats. Tired of the lies being told by both sides, tired of agendas that favor no one but themselves, tired to taxes { more than 50% of the money you and I make goes to taxes of one kind or another} Much more.

Just for once I want an honest transparent Government that stays out of the "common folks" houses. Wishful thinking huh?

on Jun 26, 2007

Reply By: JythierPosted: Tuesday, June 26, 2007
She will get caught. There's no doubt about that. But if she can push through legislation we don't really want, that's going to be a big problem for me. If she can do it quickly and quietly, I don't want her. Legislation should be loud and clear.

She keeps getting caught and getting away with lies, deceit and corruption IMO, if She becomes President I vow to Move to Iran, Convert to Islam and become a Muslim Freedom fighter. HA! {that's is what the lefties call terrorists}

on Jun 26, 2007
I think the next thing they're going to do is start quartering soldiers in our houses. Hey, we're at war, so it's constitutional!
on Jun 26, 2007
MM: ~~"She keeps getting caught and getting away with lies, deceit and corruption IMO"~~

I think pretty much every politician out there is corrupt in some way. It's just a matter of finding out who is the "lesser" of the "evils" ...

I am highly considering voting for her, but who knows...maybe that can change if another candidate garners my attention in a bigger way.
on Jun 26, 2007

If everyone lies, wouldn't you want a successful liar in your corner?

I had to laugh at your response and cynicism.  Mostly because I agree with you.

on Jun 26, 2007

Reply By: InBloomPosted: Tuesday, June 26, 2007
MM: ~~"She keeps getting caught and getting away with lies, deceit and corruption IMO"~~

I think pretty much every politician out there is corrupt in some way. It's just a matter of finding out who is the "lesser" of the "evils" ...

I am highly considering voting for her, but who knows...maybe that can change if another candidate garners my attention in a bigger way.

tis ok rose, that's why this country is great because we each can vote who we think will do the best job.

{gag} Oh OH that hurt me to write that. heh heh heh

on Jun 26, 2007

Reply By: JythierPosted: Tuesday, June 26, 2007
I think the next thing they're going to do is start quartering soldiers in our houses. Hey, we're at war, so it's constitutional!

I have a wonderfull extra bedroom I would be proud to quarter a MARINE if needed. No army, navy, air force, coast guard, need apply!

on Jun 26, 2007

Reply By: Dr GuyPosted: Tuesday, June 26, 2007
If everyone lies, wouldn't you want a successful liar in your corner?

I had to laugh at your response and cynicism. Mostly because I agree with you.

Yeh I did too doc, But come on now HILLARY? sheeshhhhh!!! anyone but HILLARY!! { I sound like the anti Bushies} Anyone But Hillary!!

on Jun 26, 2007

Reply By: little-whipPosted: Tuesday, June 26, 2007
if She becomes President I vow to Move to Iran, Convert to Islam and become a Muslim Freedom fighter.


Be careful. Those words may come back to haunt you, my friend.

naaaa, I will keep my promise as soon as the Democrats keep their promise about leaving the country if Bush won a second term. hahahahah

on Jun 26, 2007

Reply By: little-whipPosted: Tuesday, June 26, 2007
Oh, and congrats on the FEATURE!

tank you dahlink! you ever gonna call me onna weekend? hmmm???? I called 3 weekends in a row, your turn if you want to. Only if you want to of course. been six weeks since we phone talked, ok maybe five weeks.

on Jun 26, 2007
naaaa, I will keep my promise as soon as the Democrats keep their promise about leaving the country if Bush won a second term. hahahahah


If they kept their word Leftywood would be Northywood as many vowed to move to Canada.
on Jun 26, 2007
I have not read the book so take that into consideration. From the reviews and interviews I have read Bernstein tried to present a balanced view of Hilary. I don't think that this was a negative book to Hilary. He does point out her weaknesses and misteps but also her strengths. I don't think she is the most dangerous woman in America and I do think she could be a good President. I think she has tried to spin things to make herself look good. She definately doesn't want to be embarrassed. I don't think she is a chronic liar any more than anyone else is.

I haven't decided who my favorite candidate is yet. I like Biden and McCain because they both are willing to take a stand on issues that might cost them the nomination. McCain on torture and immigration. Biden on the war. I think it says a lot about their character that they are NOT determining their stance on poll results. They are willing to stand by the unpopular (in their party's) position because they think it's the right thing to do.

I do have to say that I think it is pertinent for the candidates to talk about the Bush administration. I don't think that anyone could be worse about operating in the shadows than Bush has been. He definately hasn't been an open book. Ask the White House press corps.

From a NY times article
In creating a portrait of the former first lady, Mr. Bernstein does a lot of on-the-one-hand and on-the-other-hand. He underscores Mrs. Clinton’s intelligence, toughness and resilience but also describes less than attractive traits that have more often been ascribed to George W. Bush: religious convictions that “to some bordered on a messiahlike self-perception,” a “demand for absolute loyalty,” a discomfort with being challenged. He writes that many traits seen in private by her friends — humor, spontaneity, enthusiasm — are concealed behind the “protective shell” she wears in public, and he describes “a disconnect between her convictions and words, and her actions.”
3 Pages1 2 3