America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
Make The BLEEDING HEARTS, Bleed.
Published on June 18, 2007 By Moderateman In US Domestic

Finally the United States Government has had enough of cities that have become a haven for the Criminal Illegal Aliens among us!

There was a glimmer of hope on the {sh-}amnesty landscape  in the House, as a bill to cut all Department of Homeland Security Funding to OUTLAW cities that have an Amnesty mindset toward ILLEGAL ALIENS and make them either chose Funding or continuing to break federal law by offering shelter to ILLEGALS.

U.S. Representative Tom Tancredo’s (R-CO) amendment to cut funding from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Bill (H.R. 2638) for cities that employ a sanctuary policy passed the House with strong bipartisan support today; 234 to 189. 

The Amendment would prevent cities like Denver and San Francisco who employ a sanctuary policy for illegal aliens from receiving first responder funds, including law enforcement and terrorism prevention grants, among other programs. In the meantime, sanctuary cities are on notice: Defy immigration law, risk your homeland security funding. Too bad the White House refuses to send that message.

Even a few Democrats supported the bill which had failed several times before when Tancrado introduced it. Could it be the Democrats are finally getting the message American is tired of Illegal Immigrants being above the law, killing our citizens and our children, when they should not even be in AMERICA!

  

 

 

 

 

.


Comments (Page 1)
4 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Jun 18, 2007

yayyyyyyyy for some common sense from the House of Representatives! three cheers.. or three beers, your choice of course.

Time to take these renegade cities in hand and bring them back into mainstream America, especially Sanfran FREAKO, THE CITY of nuts, queers, and fruitcakes, the city that keeps What's her face in Office, you know, she leads the house, the one that thinks she is President and can set foreign policy, Nancy sumpin sumpin,

on Jun 18, 2007

 

Reply By: little-whipPosted: Monday, June 18, 2007
While I don't agree with the notion of 'sanctuary cities'

Does this mean you think there are NOT cities that pay no attention to federal law concerning Illegals?

 

As long as the Feds confiscate the wealth of the citizens of our States via the federal income tax, I don't think they should be able to hold those funds hostage for any reason whatsoever. Remember, a lot of people who live in these cities do NOT agree with these sanctuary laws, why should they lose their protection?

Then the Good folk of those cities should VOTE out the mayor, the chief of police and anyone else NOT doing their job. Put someone in office that will obey the law and get the monies needed to protect the city. San fran freako has been defying the Federal Government long enough with no payback, Barring recruiters from the military from campuses, while allowing insane liberal freaks to run amok, Colorado has been doing the same, having "guest speakers telling children in PUBLIC SCHOOLS, drug use is ok, same sex sexual relations is just fine and encouraging them to do this unprotected. While stopping any kind o9f conservative view point dead in the water. If they want protection from the Feds, Obey the Law. or protect yourself.

 

On a side note,  I am not being pissy, I just lost interest in an explanation and felt you owe me nothing in the way of one.

 

 

 

on Jun 18, 2007
It is a nice touch, but it is still guilding the lilly on this bill.
on Jun 18, 2007
(Citizen)Dr GuyJune 18, 2007 15:43:42


It is a nice touch, but it is still guilding the lilly on this bill.


explain please doc.
on Jun 18, 2007

explain please doc.

Due to the major shortcomings of this bill (not address stopping the influx, allowing what amounts to criminals getting a free pass - amnesty or not whatever you want to call it), putting nuggets in it is not going to change the fact it is a bad bill.

on Jun 18, 2007
(Citizen)Dr GuyJune 18, 2007 15:49:42


explain please doc.

Due to the major shortcomings of this bill (not address stopping the influx, allowing what amounts to criminals getting a free pass - amnesty or not whatever you want to call it), putting nuggets in it is not going to change the fact it is a bad bill.


Am I missing something here? this bill is not the Immigration bill that Bush wants right? It is a totally different bill I believe.
on Jun 18, 2007
Am I missing something here? this bill is not the Immigration bill that Bush wants right? It is a totally different bill I believe.


No, I am. Sorry. I read it as the immigration bill. Ellen Woodsky speed reading course.
on Jun 18, 2007
(Citizen)Dr GuyJune 18, 2007 16:02:19


Am I missing something here? this bill is not the Immigration bill that Bush wants right? It is a totally different bill I believe.


No, I am. Sorry. I read it as the immigration bill. Ellen Woodsky speed reading course.


Smack!!!!! onna back o head!
on Jun 18, 2007
If they want protection from the Feds


At this point, I want protection from THE FEDS! Get some of them out of the Senate and House.  They are scarying me.   
on Jun 18, 2007
yayyyyyyyy for some common sense from the House of Representatives! three cheers.. or three beers, your choice of course.


I think you'd have Ted's *hick* vote.
on Jun 18, 2007
(Citizen)Adventure-DudeJune 18, 2007 16:12:13


If they want protection from the Feds


At this point, I want protection from THE FEDS! Get some of them out of the Senate and House. They are scaring me.


nice job on cutting part out of a sentence to prove a point, you sure you ain't a bleeding heart LIBERAL? cause that is their speciality.

yeh the FEDS scare me too.
on Jun 18, 2007
nice job on cutting part out of a sentence to prove a point, you sure you ain't a bleeding heart LIBERAL?


I was actually meaning to get them liberals out! While some of them are in there they are SCARING ME and I want protection from the Feds (meaning to keep the feds from hurting me and my country).   
on Jun 18, 2007
(Citizen)Adventure-DudeJune 18, 2007 16:32:51


nice job on cutting part out of a sentence to prove a point, you sure you ain't a bleeding heart LIBERAL?


I was actually meaning to get them liberals out! While some of them are in there they are SCARING ME and I want protection from the Feds (meaning to keep the feds from hurting me and my country).


We as a nation are reaping what we have sown, we have elected self serving pigs and should not complain when they turn the country into pigpens.
on Jun 18, 2007
Short memories. Who passed the original amnesty bill that was supposed to cure this country of illegal immigrants and protect our borders? It was Reagan and a Republican majority in the Senate.
on Jun 19, 2007

It was Reagan and a Republican majority in the Senate.

You do love arguing out of both sides of your mouth.  Over on the Republican thead, you just argued the opposite.  Since 1995 was the first time in 40 years that the republicans had a majority in the house - AND that would hardly make it a republican only debacle by your very own standards.

4 Pages1 2 3  Last