Why The Democrats hate George W. Bush so much

Published on March 15, 2006 By Moderateman In Politics

It's really very simple, George is the epitome of everything the far left hates.

George is Pro-American the far left is NOT!

George is for traditional values, the Far left hates traditional values and is looking to turn America into Europe.

George keeps his word, the left has no word to keep.

George believes marriage is between a man and women, the left believes it's between a man and child, two women or two men, soon to come, man and his horse.

George is faithful to his friends, the left has no friends, only sycophants.

Maybe some more comparisons from the members of the right can be added?

Comments (Page 3)

Moderateman

on Mar 16, 2006

Reply By: TitanI9Posted: Thursday, March 16, 2006I like it Modman.... . So many words taken from my mouth.George values commitment as a husband. When a lefty marry, they value the commitment ideal then on to the next irreconcilable deal....

except for teddy Kennedy, when he is done with a relationship, he simply drowns her,

Mary jo kopechne cannot answer for herself.

Reply By: Sarah StoecklPosted: Thursday, March 16, 2006Ok, since this has become a debate about gay marriage (which means I will ignore the content of the actual article) what does everyone think about the GOVERNMENT, not saying anything about churches, getting rid of the whole sanctioning of marriage thing and allow civil unions between consenting adults? Marriages are what happen in church, between people who want to make that commitment in the eyes of God, and civil unions give two adult people equal rights under the supposedly secular laws of the land?

I am all for civil unions, as long as the term is not marriage.

By the name of my blog has turned into "a moderate republican slowly drifting further to the right" i HAVE PEOPLE like the loons from the left to thank for that, and judgmental folk like you too .

Moderateman

on Mar 16, 2006

Reply By: TitanI9Posted: Thursday, March 16, 2006The term "traditional values" is misleading. The Fundamentalist Church of Latter Day Saints has a "tradition" of polygamyYou're way off base here. They don't have a tradition as you imply since the Mormon church denounced polygamy and it's practitioners a long time ago. Those practicing today are only a very small splinter segment of traditionalists.

Why would anyone use a long dead practice to TRY TO MAKE A POINT?

Adventure-Dude

on Mar 16, 2006

What's wrong with having them separate?

Marriage for the heteros and civil unions for the homos? Marriage is defined why are we trying to redefine? What's wrong with civil union?

Moderateman

on Mar 16, 2006

Reply By: Larry KupermanPosted: Thursday, March 16, 2006

A last comment on the lighter side. Moderateman, my friend, I would avoid the phrase "rammed down my throat" when discussing gay marriage. It is, shall I say, distasteful.

did not think of it that way, how about smashed in my face? lolololo

btw good one larry

Moderateman

on Mar 16, 2006

Reply By: Adventure-DudePosted: Thursday, March 16, 2006What's wrong with having them separate? Marriage for the heteros and civil unions for the homos? Marriage is defined why are we trying to redefine? What's wrong with civil union?

my point exactly I can care less how they make it legal or what rights they have, partners should be allowewd the same rights as married couples, as long as the term "MARRY" is left out.

Dr Guy

on Mar 16, 2006

Marriages are what happen in church, between people who want to make that commitment in the eyes of God, and civil unions give two adult people equal rights under the supposedly secular laws of the land?

That is what I have been saying all along.

Adventure-Dude

on Mar 16, 2006

Dr. Guy,

I'm sorry it just cracks me up everytime I see Alf on your blogs.

.
Sometimes I can hear his voice in my head. Should I listen?

Anyway. Two definitions for two different types of joinings. I leave your definition alone you leave my definition alone.

AD

Moderateman

on Mar 16, 2006

#37 by Adventure-Dude
Thursday, March 16, 2006

Two definitions for two different types of joinings. I leave your definition alone you leave my definition alone.

that is all I have ever said, marriage=man woman.

man man woman woman or gender challenged= civil unions.

Adventure-Dude

on Mar 16, 2006

Is the crowd hushed?

PlausibleDeniability

on Mar 16, 2006

MM, I wasn't trying to be judgemental. I respect your opinions, and your right to them, and believe that at times moderation is not called for. I just always have to restrain a little ironic giggle whenever I read posts from "Moderate Man."

As to the continuation of the thread, it sounds like we're all agreed——so-called liberals, conservatives and libertarians alike. Civil Unions=basically ok to everyone. So what are we still fighting about this for?

PlausibleDeniability

on Mar 16, 2006

Here's another note. Christianity's greatest apologist, C.S. Lewis, had very strong opinions about marriages under the State, and marriages under God. He saw them as two seperate entities, one conveying legal "rights," the other all the responsibilities that come from a holy covenant. On this issue his was the ultimate example of seperation of church and state. And while I am not a Christian, or any other religious affiliation, I can respect the concerns of spiritual people to not have a holy ceremony tainted by something they deem profoundly wrong. However, it is profoundly wrong, imo, for the State to make moral judgements based on religious beliefs. Hence, civil unions from the state, which leave religion out of the equation, take care of everyone's concerns, spiritually based or civil liberties based.

Moderateman

on Mar 16, 2006

40 by Sarah Stoeckl
Thursday, March 16, 2006

MM, I wasn't trying to be judgemental. I respect your opinions, and your right to them, and believe that at times moderation is not called for. I just always have to restrain a little ironic giggle whenever I read posts from "Moderate Man."

I did not know you were a regular reader, I thank you for that and for straightening out my misconception of your original post.

I know on some things I am very conservative, on others almost GASPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!! liberal.

Dr Guy

on Mar 16, 2006

I'm sorry it just cracks me up everytime I see Alf on your blogs. .
Sometimes I can hear his voice in my head. Should I listen?

Anyway. Two definitions for two different types of joinings. I leave your definition alone you leave my definition alone.

I love cats!

Not a problem. I dont care if the government wants to define their tax status any way they want. Just dont dictate to my Church what we have to do.

Deal?

Moderateman

on Mar 16, 2006

Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Thursday, March 16, 2006I'm sorry it just cracks me up everytime I see Alf on your blogs. .Sometimes I can hear his voice in my head. Should I listen? Anyway. Two definitions for two different types of joinings. I leave your definition alone you leave my definition alone. I love cats!Not a problem. I dont care if the government wants to define their tax status any way they want. Just dont dictate to my Church what we have to do.

I have a very difficult time imagining a preist or rabbi saying.

"I now present you, husband and husband, or wife and wife..

highbass

on Mar 16, 2006

as oppossed to the losers from the left, if he is such an idiot why does the left have no power at all?

Must be awful for you lefties to lose the senate, the house and the whitehouse to idiots huh?

What does that say about you?

i dunno what it says about me... im not left or right... as for him being elected... first time election are questionable (in my opinion) but second time election there was no substitute for Bush especially because of war on iraq... as for calling him a idiot... its more of how he conveys himself in public then anything else... you can blame Clinton for that because he set a high standard

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!