Anti-Christian Bigots

A Jews Point of View.

Published on October 21, 2005 By Moderateman In Religion

It's about time for the new annual game here in America, finish off destroying Christianity, this time they will continue the assault on Christmas, this has been building for years now and will continue to build till all mention of Christ is eliminated.

There are places where children are being suspended from school for having the nerve to say grace over a a meal.

Bibles are being removed from school libraries.

Florida is putting a stop to bible studies by using a little known zoning law.

An 11 year old in Alabama was ORDERED to remove the cross she was wearing from plain view and told to hide it under her neckline or be suspended.

Americans for the separation of church and state is suing to have "in God we trust" removed from our money, and trying to stop congress from opening sessions with a prayer. They are also trying to remove Christmas as a national holiday, completely remove all chaplin's from the military..remove all religious symbols from our national cemeteries.

On face the nation, Bob Schieffer made the following statement :"we have noticed a link between religion and crime."

The Washington post describes Christians as "largely poor and easily led .

Sharon Cohen has written a article {she is an A.P. reporter} saying Christians are prone to rioting and are terrorist. She also compares christian leaders with the Ayatollahs of Iran, {this woman is nuts!}

The IRS is targeting churches aiming to take away there tax exempt status. {this is against the first amendment}

I believe that we must fight this crap going on, the same way we fight racism and anti-semitism!!

http://accounting.smartpros.com/x45700.xml . This is the IRS link.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=X&oi=scholart&q=articles+by+Sharon+Cohen,+a.p.+reporter . This is a link to ms Cohen's articles.

http://www.aclj.org/News/Read.aspx?ID=239. This is the story about the 11 year old in Alabama.

http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/ftn/main3460.shtml. This is a link to Bob Schieffer.

http://www.au.org/. this link takes you to separation of church and state homepage. read it and weep.

When will we the heart and soul of America stop letting these animals use the courts to get there way?

How much further will we allow the removal of Christianity from America, once it's gone can the Jewish faith be far behind?

Wow no sleep let me write all night to keep my mind occupied.

MM not a christian, but I do love GOD.
"

Comments (Page 7)

Moderateman

on Oct 26, 2005

92 by sunwukong
Wednesday, October 26, 2005

liberal causes are what is in vogue and it's always in vogue to hate jews.

Again, mindless partisan bullshit.

Please point out the so-called "hatred" involved in the previous posts.

the above staement is my statement as a jew and how I feel, I never pointed at you in anyway, but. if the shoe fits? hmm???My feelings are just that, feelings ok?

sunwukong

on Oct 26, 2005

the above staement is my statement as a jew and how I feel, I never pointed at you in anyway,

To you I apologize for calling you on the carpet for such a blanket statement -- it's easy to infer that you were pointing fingers by openly quoting Dr Guy's accusations.

but. if the shoe fits? hmm???

Again, proof of any sort, please.

My feelings are just that, feelings ok?

Sure.

Moderateman

on Oct 27, 2005

Reply By: sunwukongPosted: Wednesday, October 26, 2005the above staement is my statement as a jew and how I feel, I never pointed at you in anyway,To you I apologize for calling you on the carpet for such a blanket statement -- it's easy to infer that you were pointing fingers by openly quoting Dr Guy's accusations.but. if the shoe fits? hmm???Again, proof of any sort, please.

I think the use of BUT in the above staement is self explainatory.

Moderateman

on Oct 27, 2005

I think the use of BUT in the above statement is self explainatory.

Dr Guy

on Oct 27, 2005

I call bullshit. Please point out the anti-semitism in the statements.

In fact, please point out the liberal statements in the post as well.

You used one whack job to tar an entire people. Sounds like a racists to me. Dont get coy. If I used Juan Corona to paint all mexicans, would I not be a racist? Hell Yes!

Dont Pussy foot around. you want to be an Anti-Semite, fine. Dont hide behind nuances like the KKK does.

Dr Guy

on Oct 27, 2005

the Last time the Jews slaughter a bunch of people was during King David?

I pointed out two instances in the near past where at least a minority of the Jewish people supported the actions where non-combatants were killed.

You see that is your hypocrisy. I said The Jews. Not a Jew. Not a couple of Jews. The Jews. You then pointed out a couple of extremists. Now you are bobbing and wearing and saying minority.

You lost. Give it up.

bakerstreet

on Oct 27, 2005

Hmm, I wonder if all those Germans who worked in bomb factories in WW2 were soldiers? If the Palestinian people support Hamas and decide to allow bomb factories to function in their neighborhoods, are they really "innocent"? When Israel is attacked, they fight back. It isn't their fault that civilians in palestine willingly act as human shields.

sunwukong

on Oct 27, 2005

You used one whack job to tar an entire people

And you made a universal declaration that sought to falsely angelize an entire people.

With respect to Goldstein, do you deny there was a very vocal minority that supported his actions and view him as a hero? Do you deny that this group regards Goldstein's actions as a positive action for the Jewish people? At what point (a majority? an assigned leadership group?) would you say the actions can be assigned to "The Jews"?

Do you actually mean to say, "The last time at least the majority of Jews slaughtered a bunch of people was during King David?"

Or did you mean to say, "The last time a Jewish group slaughtered a bunch of people was during King David?"

The first is laughable -- attribute it to any other widely-distributed people, "The last time at least the majority of Acadians slaughtered a bunch of people ..." and it becomes some bizarre basis for paranoia (a world wide Cajun conspiracy to commit murder).

When you say, "The Jews", who are you attributing this label to such that they can perform the action of killing a bunch of people?

1. An individual (e.g., Goldstein) with the support of the extremist settler and religious community -- not a candidate because the majority of Jews don't support his actions?

2. Israeli military units (e.g., IDF at Jenin) -- not a candidate because Israel =!= all Jews and IDF =!= all Israel?

3. ???

You lost. Give it up.

You seem to like these unilateral declarations of victory. You must've been the type of student that wrote, "I leave the remains of this proof as an exercise for the teacher."

sunwukong

on Oct 27, 2005

If the Palestinian people support Hamas and decide to allow bomb factories to function in their neighborhoods, are they really "innocent"?

Alright, what about the Palestinians that don't support Hamas? Most likely they still have bomb factories in their neighbourhoods and can do little except inform. For those that choose not to take that risky route (and it can mean a harsh death at the hands of Hamas or others in the community), are they innocent? Their proximity to the factories means that their homes and families will suffer when retaliation comes. What if they didn't know a factory was nearby?

100

Dr Guy

on Oct 27, 2005

And you made a universal declaration that sought to falsely angelize an entire people.

Wrong again. I was not angelizing anyone. I was making a statement of fact. I never said that Jews commit no crimes. point to it and show me where I did. Please.

you cant, because it is not there. Dont go excusing your behavior now with lame excuses.

101

Dr Guy

on Oct 27, 2005

You seem to like these unilateral declarations of victory. You must've been the type of student that wrote, "I leave the remains of this proof as an exercise for the teacher."

No,but I leave it to people who will discuss and debate what is said and not try to split hairs and put words into other's mouths. Period.

By your examples, you have just called all US Soldiers Baby Killers. Why? Why do you hate the US soldiers so much. What about them inflames you to such vitriol?

See how stupid you sound? Since you are so dense, that was an extreme example, just like yours.

Oh, and Jenin. Better get your facts straight.

102

Moderateman

on Oct 27, 2005

I have much more respect for an out and out Jewhater, just let me know where you stand and I will proceed from there.

103

sunwukong

on Oct 27, 2005

I was making a statement of fact.

I'll start you off with your original quote:

No guilt doc, unlike the blacks in america I ain't about to reach back in time to find more stuff to bitch about.

It's your blog and your right to bitch if you want to. I have no problem. I wish I could do more, but the last I checked, the Last time the Jews slaughter a bunch of people was during King David? I am not sure of the reign (but when all those guys got circumcised....)

So basically not since the conquering of Jerusalem by King David (routing of the Canaanites and all that) or some such conflict at that time (around 870 BCE), have "the Jews slaughtered a bunch of people."

That still leaves open my question on what group(s), in this modern time, can constitute the label "The Jews" with respect to being able to kill a bunch of people.

This is becoming tiresome -- if you truly believe that I am an anti-semitic spreader of hate and misinformation, then I have clearly violated the terms of use for JU. If you really believe this, then you'll call the admins down on me and have me banned.

3. MEMBER CONDUCT
You agree to not use the Service to:

(a) upload, post or otherwise transmit any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, pornographic, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;

104

sunwukong

on Oct 27, 2005

I have much more respect for an out and out Jewhater, just let me know where you stand and I will proceed from there.

Strawman in the making -- if I say, "I have absolutely no racial biases" would you accept it? This is set up be a damned in any case scenario. Nevertheless, I'll take the risk:

As far as I am self-aware, I hold no racial biases.

I am dead set against universal statements of fact or truth, though.

105

Moderateman

on Oct 27, 2005

#106 by sunwukong
Thursday, October 27, 2005

"I have absolutely no racial biases" would you accept it? This is set up be a damned in any case scenario. Nevertheless, I'll take the risk:

As far as I am self-aware, I hold no racial biases.

I will take you at your word.. MM

Like I have said many times if you start inserting disclaimers on everything you write you will get no where fast.

*disclaimer* some will get there faster than others, not all others though just some of the more educated others, but not all educated others either just some, well more than some but not all.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!