America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
The Hillary Clinton Whitehouse
Published on October 7, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics
Today Hillary Clinton Officially took office swearing on a copy of Roe v Wade to uphold the office of the President of the United States, at her side Vice-President Bill Clinton.

Her official cabinet list contains the names of.

Secretary of State: Barbara Streisand

Secretary of Defense: Micheal Moore

Secretary of the Treasury: John Kerry

This is what we have to look forward to if we on the right do not elect another Republican President.

A bunch of Sellout America Liberals.


Comments (Page 6)
8 PagesFirst 4 5 6 7 8 
on Oct 08, 2005
My apologies, I exclusively visit the politics section of JU - never anything else, so I will expand my horizons and read your blog.

My Uncle recently passed from liver failure due to Hep. C. He was 56.
on Oct 08, 2005
Reply By: DeferencePosted: Saturday, October 08, 2005My apologies, I exclusively visit the politics section of JU - never anything else, so I will expand my horizons and read your blog.My Uncle recently passed from liver failure due to Hep. C. He was 56.


sorry for your loss, I am 59 and still here, plan on seeing my 60th, maybe more, some say I am too mean to die. hahahaha
on Oct 08, 2005
Shhh! Blutto's on a roll!


Excellent Animal House reference Dr!
on Oct 08, 2005
Have at it drama queen.

I think you know this to be a false characterization of me, Bakerstreet.


Yeah, Baker mis-characterized.... He meant to say "Have at it QUEEN", but somehow he included the modifier drama needlessly.
on Oct 08, 2005
Excellent Animal House reference Dr!


Ah! A fan of the greatest comedy ever!
on Oct 08, 2005

Yeah, Baker mis-characterized.... He meant to say "Have at it QUEEN", but somehow he included the modifier drama needlessly.


Yeah, your wish; not my desire.

Whatever, terp, bring on some debate and you'll see who is the butch and who is the bitch.

on Oct 08, 2005
Whatever, terp, bring on some debate and you'll see who is the butch and who is the bitch.


SO far that seems to be your cleverest line, and about the most defining. WHy dont you spell out what you believe, instead of sniping at the edges and mis-interpreting everyone else.
on Oct 08, 2005
mm claps hands real loud, hollars CHILDREN!!! lets try to behave.

If I am ok with deference and how we relate now cannot we try to be civil?

DO NOT ME GET UP OUTTA THIS CHAIR!!

hahahahaha
on Oct 08, 2005
yeh some honest debate... bring it on. will Hillary get the nod, who will get nod in the republican party?

I say giuliani or mccain {ew on john}
on Oct 08, 2005
Hillary would be a huge mistake for dems. .

Go Dean, go Kucinisch, go Kerry, go Edwards, go

an actual conservative candidate.
on Oct 08, 2005
McCain would ring the most with me, at the moment for Repub. candidate, he's always been against pork barrel spending...that's fiscal conservativism right there.
on Oct 08, 2005
86 by Deference
Saturday, October 08, 2005


McCain would ring the most with me, at the moment for Rep. candidate, he's always been against pork barrel spending...that's fiscal conservatism right there.


I feel kind of sold out by the gang of 14 thing, with McCain leading the charge.

Giuliani is "too ethnic"

I really think SHRILLERY will get the nod, although I am a registered republican I will vote for the moderate from either party. yep even McCain.
on Oct 08, 2005
85 by Deference
Saturday, October 08, 2005


Hillary would be a huge mistake for dems. .

Go Dean, go Kucinisch, go Kerry, go Edwards, go

an actual conservative candidate.


besides bill richardson, who lives in to small a state I think to pull it
off who else can the left offer that is conservative? My jewish brother Joe Leiberman is Jewish and that leaves him out completely, I would vote for joe in a hot second, not because he is a brother Jew, but a conservative Dem.
on Oct 09, 2005
The question as to who would lead the Republican Party and lead it well is a very good question.

Suggestions?
on Oct 09, 2005
>um nope does not clear why YOU CHOOSE to be insulting, with a cavalier "total waste of blog space" remark.

I think I've explained this as well as I can, drmiler, sorry I can't fill in all the blanks or make you understand.


I'll take your apology now. Seeings how I'm NOT the one who made this statement. MM did.


#60 by Moderateman
Saturday, October 08, 2005



57 by Deference
Saturday, October 08, 2005


you didn't come looking for a fight then "why" did you write the things you did?

That's an honest and sincere question, so I'm going to break it down just for you.

My first comment in post 26, as I explained was due to my inability to see the purpose of the post. I concluded - total waste of space. Moderate man could have really made quite an interesting, insightful, or even funny blog with the concept of the next president elect and provided a cohesive piece which clued the reader in to what the cause of the post was. I felt all of those elements were missing which led me to think that perhaps this was a reference to something the other users knew of. No, it seemed, this was just an excuse to get 'the gang' back together and chat for a second.

I noted this in my response to moderate man who insulted me, obviously feeling a sting from a critical response.

Past my second post in this blog, I've mostly been dealing with responding to insults.

I hope my explanation clears the clouds a bit.


um nope does not clear why YOU CHOOSE to be insulting, with a cavalier "total waste of blog space" remark.

I have never been impolite {at least in the last 6 months} to a dissenting opinion, shades of grey and I always butt heads and never disrespect each other.
8 PagesFirst 4 5 6 7 8