Date: January 2009

The Hillary Clinton Whitehouse

Published on October 7, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics

Today Hillary Clinton Officially took office swearing on a copy of Roe v Wade to uphold the office of the President of the United States, at her side Vice-President Bill Clinton.

Her official cabinet list contains the names of.

Secretary of State: Barbara Streisand

Secretary of Defense: Micheal Moore

Secretary of the Treasury: John Kerry

This is what we have to look forward to if we on the right do not elect another Republican President.

A bunch of Sellout America Liberals.

Comments (Page 2)

bakerstreet

on Oct 07, 2005

I don't buy it. I don't think she's electable. For every smelly hippie that votes for her, five apathetic conservatives will be motivated to vote who usually don't. I don't see her dragging out conservative Democrats, and she'd have to, in droves.

My prediction is that if Hillary runs, it will be the first election in a long time to break the 70% turnout mark, maybe higher. She is loved by some, and hated by many. If Democrats who lean right weren't persuaded to vote for her, she'd not have a chance.

I think you'll see the opposite. I think you'll see a more moderate Democrat next time. I think it will be a lot like the Bush Sr vs. Bill Clinton election. They'll pick someone with a 'down home' attitude, easy going, and no big agenda that seems outside the system. Granted, once they are in we'll see just how liberal they really are, much to our dismay.

Look for a democratic governor next time. If you want to be REALLY paranoid, imagine what would happen in McCain jumped ship... and anyone who wants to seem outraged at the thought isn't going to get much play from me. IMHO, McCain constantly proves he isn't above such a thing.

Moderateman

on Oct 07, 2005

Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005I stuffed 2008 down my pants, therefore it does not excist.Please dont reproduce it then!

already did it has twins so its no 4018and still no dems in the whitehouse.hahahaha

Moderateman

on Oct 07, 2005

Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005I don't buy it. I don't think she's electable. For every smelly hippie that votes for her, five apathetic conservatives will be motivated to vote who usually don't. I don't see her dragging out conservative Democrats, and she'd have to, in droves.

I agree baker.. hillery is not acceptable to anyone with one braincell, but then wierder things have happened.

think you'll see the opposite. I think you'll see a more moderate Democrat next time. I think it will be a lot like the Bush Sr vs. Bill Clinton election. They'll pick someone with a 'down home' attitude, easy going, and no big agenda that seems outside the system. Granted, once they are in we'll see just how liberal they really are, much to our dismay.Look for a democratic governor next time. If you want to be REALLY paranoid, imagine what would happen in McCain jumped ship... and anyone who wants to seem outraged at the thought isn't going to get much play from me. IMHO, McCain constantly proves he isn't above such a thing.

any ideas on who from the left fits that bill that is also a serious candidate?

Look for mc cain or guilliani to run away for the right.

I personally will vote for the MODERATE from either party.

bakerstreet

on Oct 07, 2005

Bill Richardson is someone you hear whispered about, and he is certainly a possibility. I think another name you'll be hearing someday is Jim Doyle.

I have a half written blog on who I think might get the nod in 2008. They have options, there's no doubting it. I think we have a lot more chance of being blindsided by an ultra-Liberal in moderate's clothing than Democrats have to worry about the reverse.

Dr Guy

on Oct 07, 2005

any ideas on who from the left fits that bill that is also a serious candidate?

Bill Richardson.

Dr Guy

on Oct 07, 2005

Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005
Bill Richardson

Damn! Beat me again!

But I do have to disagree with you Baker. If the left was sane and rational, that is what they would do. But read the Daily Kos or DU.org and you will see that the controllers of the democrat party are anything but sane and rational.

bakerstreet

on Oct 07, 2005

I don't think you give them enough credit, doc. I think they went with Kerry in the last election because they felt Bush was going to have a hard time. They know how hard it is to get an entrenched Senator into the white house.

Frankly, if you had asked me how the election would go for Bush, I wouldn't have said he would win by as much as he did. They thought they had a really unpopular president, and it was their chance to slip in a legislator who would normally be hard to elect.

Wasn't that the exact same mistake the Republicans made with Dole? They thought all their muckraking with Clinton during his first term was enough to make people overlook decades of political manuvering in Congress. It isn't. I think the decisions they've made so far have been based upon believing their own propaganda.

I don't think they'll make the same mistake again. I could be wrong, but I think the next time you see the Dems or Republicans nominate a Congressman, it will be when both sides do so. Otherwise, you are running with two strikes against you.

Moderateman

on Oct 07, 2005

Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005Bill Richardson is someone you hear whispered about, and he is certainly a possibility. I think another name you'll be hearing someday is Jim Doyle.I have a half written blog on who I think might get the nod in 2008. They have options, there's no doubting it. I think we have a lot more chance of being blindsided by an ultra-Liberal in moderate's clothing than Democrats have to worry about the reverse.

will look forwaed to reading blog.. thasnx for the heads up.. will check out doyle.

Moderateman

on Oct 07, 2005

Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005Bill Richardson Damn! Beat me again!But I do have to disagree with you Baker. If the left was sane and rational, that is what they would do. But read the Daily Kos or DU.org and you will see that the controllers of the democrat party are anything but sane and rational.

one can only hope the left stays true to form and serves up another east coast LIBERAL.

Moderateman

on Oct 07, 2005

don't think they'll make the same mistake again. I could be wrong, but I think the next time you see the Dems or Republicans nominate a Congressman, it will be when both sides do so. Otherwise, you are running with two strikes against you.

time will tell baker, time will tell.

Deference

on Oct 07, 2005

Another absolute waste of perfectly good blogspace.

Moderateman

on Oct 07, 2005

Reply By: DeferencePosted: Friday, October 07, 2005Another absolute waste of perfectly good blogspace.

geee deference I am humbled by your sarcastic wit, where are you in the list of top bloggers? or top blogspts? oh yeh you do not excist.

bakerstreet

on Oct 07, 2005

I guess if you can't take part in a reasonable conversation, it makes you feel better to pretend you are above it.

Moderateman

on Oct 07, 2005

Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005I guess if you can't take part in a reasonable conversation, it makes you feel better to pretend you are above it.

I can always count on deference much like myrrander to come in my blog and shit in it, then leave in a selfrightous huff.

Deference

on Oct 07, 2005

geee deference I am humbled by your sarcastic wit, where are you in the list of top bloggers? or top blogspts? oh yeh you do not excist.

At least I can spell - or at least take the time and the effort to show some pride in what I write to run spellcheck.

"Moderateman", I don't need the opinion of JU users to know I'm far ahead of you in any capacity. I simply shared my (very reasoned - I might add, Bakerstreet) opinion.

I just show up to JU today and here I see an out of-the-blue post with relevance to... what current event?

If this was posted as political commentary it seems dated at best, if this was meant as satire, it isn't clever but if it was meant as an excuse for die hard bushites to sit around and reminisce old barbs about 'the left', then it seems you've just about accomplished that - an achievement with little value and in my modest opinion - another absolute waste of blog space.

If there was something within the post that was particularly compelling or had some sort of objective endpoint to it I would have let it alone or been glad to take part in the conversation, but when reading it, I'm wondering, "What's the point?" Which leads me to conclude...

...another ABSOLUTE WASTE OF BLOG-SPACE.

Oh yeah, top blogger? I read little whip's very interesting, informative blog that had a point on manipulating the JoeUser point system.

I would assert that it is your myraid garrulous Link
posts that bring up your posting numbers as opposed to any particular majority opinion branding you as a 'top blogger'.

Keep hittin' the tarbaby!

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!