Convenient or intentional?
What’s up with all the blogs here on Joe user that only give information that supports the argument put forth by the author?
One blog shouts Innocent man killed in England, telling the story, BUT leaving out one important FACT, that the man was ordered to stop by the police.
Disobeying a lawful order given by law enforcement after they identify themselves is a crime in and of itself.
No one questioned why the man jumped a turnstile and ran from the police after ORDERED to stop.
Another blog shouts Karl Rove ousted Plame, leaving out two important facts, one that plame was not undercover and two that Rove has not even been charged with a crime.
I know we all love putting our own perspective on things, but to leave out facts that support the opposing view is just plain bad writing and misleading.
We all get annoyed when we see one side or the other put “spin” on something, yet we do not hesitate spinning something ourselves.
I find this hypocritical to say the least.