America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
Don't Tread on me!
Published on February 14, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics
Lets start off by dispelling this MYTH that liberals are “open Minded”.

They are not even approaching open-mindedness, the only time a liberal is “open minded” is when YOU are agreeing or in total compliance with their views.

Simply test a liberal with a differing point and see how fast their tiny little minds slam shut.

If YOU do not agree with them or march in lock step to how they see the world, watch how fast the slander flies.

You will be labeled hard headed, stupid, out of touch, or just plain WRONG.

They love to sit on their soap boxes and preach equality, and freedom for all, but that’s just a ploy, you’re only equal to them if you think and behave like them, and the only freedom they offer is the freedom FROM CHOICE, it’s their way or nothing.

Sooner or later {I hope later} they are going to have to come to the reality America sees them for the shams they are.

I have tried to be kinder with liberals, to NO avail. They see kindness as some kind of weakness, which opens the floodgates of condemnation and scorn.

Remember I have offered peace or war, your choice. I will not stand to be chastised, disrespected or dictated to how I must behave as long as I break no laws.

Tread at your own peril {poetic license}.

Remember one of the very first flags to be flown in America has a venomous snake on it saying, DON’T TREAD ON ME.

Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Feb 15, 2005
1- My blog, my rules
2- my views are not liberal they are "moderate" hence the name moderateman.
3- try to post a reply just once without useing ad hominem... it's getting old and overused by you.


1 - Um, not 'your' blog. Unless you are Mr StarDock UbiSoft & you wrote the terms of use for this site.


As long as he follows Joeuser's terms of service, I think you'll find it is *his* blog!
on Feb 15, 2005
No surprise, but I agree with the Modman.

Cons are traditionally the accepted "closed-minded" stiffnecks. After coming here for a few months, however, I've seen that many Libs are truly worse than they accuse us of being. You often can't tell them anything, even if you present facts and figures to back up your point. That's not rational.
Perhaps in the past it was true that the Cons were closed-minded and uptight, but the pendulum has swung the other way in recent years. Must be all the drugs they used in the 60s.
on Feb 15, 2005
After coming here for a few months, however, I've seen that many Libs are truly worse than they accuse us of being.


Yeah, and oddly enough, they claim credit for civil rights legislation that bans, among other thing, discrimination based on religious belief.

Things that make you go hmmm...

take care, folks.
on Feb 15, 2005
Um, yes it is according the AUP.


This may be a simple misunderstanding that appears to have TWO correct views. (How's that for open minded? )

FYI, I access ModMan's posts via www.politicalmachine.com. It's a video game site with a 'forum' page, not a blog site.

And I definitely didn't know that my posts appeared elsewhere when I submit them. I can't say I'm crazy about that. But thanks for the wider info.
on Feb 15, 2005
This may be a simple misunderstanding that appears to have TWO correct views. (How's that for open minded? )


I did not realize that all the sites were not blog sites or better ahd a blog on them. Ok, you are correct, for partial understanding, and I was wrong for partial understanding. Which makes both of us right.

I gotta stop or any more open minded and my brains are going to fall ou!
on Feb 15, 2005
Reply By: stevendedalusPosted: Tuesday, February 15, 2005- my views are not liberal they are "moderate" hence the name moderateman.Your rightist drivel is far from moderate but definitely "twisted."


ohhhh I am soooooo hurt you think what i write is drivel... boo hoo..
on Feb 15, 2005
Reply By: NJforeverPosted: Tuesday, February 15, 2005True, there are some liberals out there that will respond as you say, but there are also a number of conservatives that would call you a treasonous, unpatriotic, terrorist supporter, the minute you criticize the administration, the president or his policies.I think Eisenhower said it best:"I have no patience with extreme Rightists who call everyone who disagrees with them a Communist, nor with the Leftists who shout that the rest of us are heartless moneygrubbers."


nice quote i will attempt to put that into action. thank you nj
on Feb 15, 2005
Reply By: MyrranderPosted: Tuesday, February 15, 2005your blog is getting to be like a bad car accidenti gotta stop rubbernecking later, wormwood


blah blah blah,,, boo hoo boo hoo,,, waaaaaa waaa you have some nerve to talk about someone else having a blog as a car accident? too funny and a real good example of "valid projection"
on Feb 15, 2005
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Tuesday, February 15, 20051 - Um, not 'your' blog. Unless you are Mr StarDock UbiSoft & you wrote the terms of use for this site.Um, yes it is according the AUP. He can write anything he wants as long as he does not directly attack anotehr user by name.The site is not his, the blog is.


I just practiced aborting this Progressive usa fellow... if ya listen carefully ya can hear me flush his post down the toilet..
on Feb 15, 2005
Reply By: RightwingerPosted: Tuesday, February 15, 2005No surprise, but I agree with the Modman. Cons are traditionally the accepted "closed-minded" stiffnecks. After coming here for a few months, however, I've seen that many Libs are truly worse than they accuse us of being. You often can't tell them anything, even if you present facts and figures to back up your point. That's not rational. Perhaps in the past it was true that the Cons were closed-minded and uptight, but the pendulum has swung the other way in recent years. Must be all the drugs they used in the 60s.


yikes.... now your gonna get put on the most hated list by the bleeding whiners crowd..
on Feb 15, 2005
Reply By: Gideon MacLeishPosted: Tuesday, February 15, 2005After coming here for a few months, however, I've seen that many Libs are truly worse than they accuse us of being.Yeah, and oddly enough, they claim credit for civil rights legislation that bans, among other thing, discrimination based on religious belief.Things that make you go hmmm...take care, folks.


thanx gid.... one post and so many leftwingers {not nj} crying in there soup... but to them. they never say/do/think/ anything wrong. bwahahahahah
on Feb 15, 2005
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Tuesday, February 15, 2005This may be a simple misunderstanding that appears to have TWO correct views. (How's that for open minded? )I did not realize that all the sites were not blog sites or better ahd a blog on them. Ok, you are correct, for partial understanding, and I was wrong for partial understanding. Which makes both of us right.I gotta stop or any more open minded and my brains are going to fall ou!


open minded is good doc.... keeps ya from falling on the LEFT side of yer head... tee hee hee
on Feb 16, 2005
1- My blog, my rules
2- my views are not liberal they are "moderate" hence the name moderateman.
3- try to post a reply just once without useing ad hominem... it's getting old and overused by you.


Hey, ModMan, why'd you delete my response? Ha ha! Can't stand the heat, so you pretend I didn't respond.

Here I'll post it again, so you can DELETE it again! Ha ha ha!!

1 - OK, that one's settled: Blog v. forum. Split decision. Point taken.
2 - Pro choice, pro-gun control, etc, are widely viewed as 'liberal' positions -- and you've claime they are your views. So why do you insist on rebuking yourself publicly like this?
3 - My use of the word 'ad hominem' is not nearly as tiresome as you practice of ad hominem. And there's nothing 'moderate' about ad hominem attacks.
on Feb 16, 2005
1- My blog, my rules
2- my views are not liberal they are "moderate" hence the name moderateman.
3- try to post a reply just once without useing ad hominem... it's getting old and overused by you.


Hey, ModMan, why'd you delete my response? Ha ha! Can't stand the heat, so you pretend I didn't respond.

Here I'll post it again, so you can DELETE it again! Ha ha ha!!

1 - OK, that one's settled: Blog v. forum. Split decision. Point taken.
2 - Pro choice, pro-gun control, etc, are widely viewed as 'liberal' positions -- and you've claime they are your views. So why do you insist on rebuking yourself publicly like this?
3 - My use of the word 'ad hominem' is not nearly as tiresome as you practice of ad hominem. And there's nothing 'moderate' about ad hominem attacks.


You obviously don't read well do you?


I just practiced aborting this Progressive usa fellow... if ya listen carefully ya can hear me flush his post down the toilet..


That's from reply #24
on Feb 16, 2005
Thanks, doc. That just confirmed my point: He can't handle rebuttal.

If he holds all these liberal positions, as he's claimed, why does he hate himself so much?
3 Pages1 2 3