The Democrats piss me off again

once more........... with feeling

Published on February 6, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics

As the Iraqis are fight for their lives and very existence, they have come up with a new tool for the world to see what craven cowards the terrorist is.

They simply film them upon capture and incarceration.

Since the terrorist use this tool to instill fear, showing the beheading of captives, the Iraqis decided to fight fire with fire.

Now on film used by the terrorist showing how courageous they are. This new edited film is interspaced with the same terrorist cowering and cringing, apoligetic, pathetic little men that they are.

Already the Democrats are crying that showing these men flies in the face of the Geneva conventions. {Too bad, so sad} AT the same time never crying the terrorist do the same thing.

Why do the democrats always cry about things one sided? Is it to show their care and concern? I think not.

Watch and see. Somehow this will turn out to be President Bushes fault or Rumsfelds fault, somehow someway the Democrats will twist, lie, bend to make this Iraqi thing all this administrations fault.

Comments (Page 4)

Moderateman

on Feb 07, 2005

Reply By: NJforeverPosted: Monday, February 07, 2005

nj? read the original post.... its about terrorist being taped in custody,, they are not being tortured, harmed, beheaded, mistreated,
its shows them for their true colors, cowardly, contrite , apoligetic, get it now?

Dr Guy

on Feb 07, 2005

While I see nothing wrong with showing a video tape of captured terrorists, I did not see anything in the original article about torture or the condoning of it either, so I think the equation that this is wrong because it is torture is off the mark.

I also dont see where the tape will stop the terrorists. I think the intended audience is the terrorist sympathisers. It shows them not as brave martyrs, but the sniveling cowards they truly are.

Moderateman

on Feb 07, 2005

Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Monday, February 07, 2005While I see nothing wrong with showing a video tape of captured terrorists, I did not see anything in the original article about torture or the condoning of it either, so I think the equation that this is wrong because it is torture is off the mark.I also dont see where the tape will stop the terrorists. I think the intended audience is the terrorist sympathisers. It shows them not as brave martyrs, but the sniveling cowards they truly are.

bingo!!!! short sweet and to the point doc.. insightful

Daiwa

on Feb 07, 2005

If simply showing their faces is somehow a violation of the Geneva Convention, then all of our Post Offices have a big problem.

Cheers,
Daiwa

sandy2

on Feb 07, 2005

Daiwa, moderateman, please show me where liberals have said that anything is wrong about what is being done (again, I am not quite sure what is going on, but I couldn't find anything about it). I think this was a set up/

couchman

on Feb 07, 2005

Call me crazy..and I'm sure the left-wing pansies will....but for the sake of argument...let's treat terrorists as a plan old criminal matter...best handled by law enforcement...now judging by the nightly news...any channel will do...whats the one thing thats consistent with the arrest of a criminal?

It's the plastering of their images, videos of their interviews, etc across the screens and pages from coast to coast...so by the useful idiots of the left deffinition of considering terrorists as nothing more than criminals let alone as simply misguided....if we released video tape of them...either with a recorded statement or not...wouldnt it fall along the lines that the left so loudly cries for...

Regardless...the geneva convention..no matter how much the left around the world wants it to...does not apply and never has regarding terrorists....to make it apply would require yet another convention to clearly define the rules regarding their treatment....and since even the UN cant seem to define terrorism...what makes anyone believe a geneva convention would have any better success?

One final thought...the showing of the captured terrorists linked to the beheadings does have a back end result of showing to the world, arab and western alike that these scum (and they are) are nothing more than cowards when captured begging for forgiveness....this has a long term pyschological effect on the mindset in that part of the world..same thing that happened after Saddam was captured looking like a homeless evil Santa.....it cripled the image of the individual willing to die with a gun in his hand trying to kill a few more "infidels" before dying....personally...I'd knee cap all the terrorists we captured and drop them off on the top of Mt. Everest...if they make it down..alive crawling...they get life in jail.otherwise they die and I could care less...but thats just my opinion.

Couchman

messybuu

on Feb 07, 2005

I don't really know what he meant, but what I think he meant was if it's okay for Iraqi soldiers to videotape said treatment of terrorists, it must be okay for terrorists to do the same to Iraqi soldiers, not that the insurgents haven't hurt civilians

And that still involves ignoring the difference between beheading Iraqi soldiers (which isn't the only people they have beheaded) and arresting these criminals.
When you think about it, one can suggest that raping and murdering a policewoman and filming isn't wrong because of the television show, Cops.

Well, I'm definitely seeing it by at least two of the liberals here.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!