The far left dictionary of blogging

Published on January 28, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics

Here is a sample of far left definitions when attacking someone:

1. You have poor grammar and spelling.
Real definition is, I cannot poke holes in your argument so let me deflect it and pick on your education. Or you have no education therefore you have no opinion of value.

2. Arguing with you is hopeless. Real definition is, since you will not see things MY way, I will pick up my ball and go home, so there!

3. You point out the obvious, real definition is hey your not leaving me room to argue, or if you are going to do that your not playing fair.

4.I am only pointing out the obvious to you, real definition is, this is how I see it and you are to stupid to agree.

5. I just do not get your point of view; real definition is I can see what you’re typing but if I agree my leftwing compatriots will jump me on.

This is just a small sample, but I am sure my fellow right thinkers will come up with a few more.

On a happier note I will not be around today as I am going fishing in the Sacramento river for sturgeon, see ya tommorow!

Comments (Page 3)

Moderateman

on Jan 29, 2005

Reply By: MyrranderPosted: Saturday, January 29, 2005*smirk*Learn basic grammar and spelling and perhaps you won't have that problem

ahhhhhhhh my sweet boy.... could you do some in home tutoring???? I will surely pay you tuesday for any lessons today..

Moderateman

on Jan 29, 2005

Mod, you are that 10 percent of the American electorate that moves wherever the popular winds might blow them. In the 40s you would have been an FDR Democrat. You amuse me.

ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh WRONG!!!! but then again as a liberal your used to being wrong...I am here to amuse, glad you find me amusing..

Dr Guy

on Jan 29, 2005

ahhhhhhhh my sweet boy.... could you do some in home tutoring???? I will surely pay you tuesday for any lessons today..

MM, why do you respond to him? He only has sarcasm and grammar as his arguements. He doe snot post intelligent thoughts as he gave them all away when he was a teen. Hit the hemp too hard!

dharmagrl

on Jan 29, 2005

MM, why do you respond to him? He only has sarcasm and grammar as his arguements. He doe snot post intelligent thoughts as he gave them all away when he was a teen. Hit the hemp too hard!

Now that's not true. Myrr has posted some very interesting non-political articles.

Is this all we can write about these days? The right saying the left sucks, that they're a bunch of whiny babies who can't hold an argument; that they're 'loony luddites'? It's the same subject being hashed and rehashed again, and it's getting tiresome. The reponse to that statement is probably going to be 'well, don't read the articles if they offend you'....but when the forums are flooded with the same subject it's kind of hard to ignore. And I haven't been reading; that's why I've stayed away from JU for a while.

Dr Guy

on Jan 29, 2005

No Dharma, he is bipolar, and I dont read him. you never know if you are going to get the rational one or the loony one. So when he posts the loony ones, I was just saying dont respond. When he is sane, do so.

Just look at his responses and then decide who has control of his keyboard. I dont want to play guesing games so I ignore them all.

Moderateman

on Jan 30, 2005

Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Saturday, January 29, 2005ahhhhhhhh my sweet boy.... could you do some in home tutoring???? I will surely pay you tuesday for any lessons today..MM, why do you respond to him? He only has sarcasm and grammar as his arguements. He doe snot post intelligent thoughts as he gave them all away when he was a teen. Hit the hemp too hard!

ummmmmmm cause I LIKE him...and do respect his views,, even if I disagree with Most of them..

Moderateman

on Jan 30, 2005

Reply By: dharmagrlPosted: Saturday, January 29, 2005MM, why do you respond to him? He only has sarcasm and grammar as his arguements. He doe snot post intelligent thoughts as he gave them all away when he was a teen. Hit the hemp too hard!Now that's not true. Myrr has posted some very interesting non-political articles.

See above dharma and will will notice I agreed with you about myrr

Angloesque

on Jan 30, 2005

Reply By: Moderateman Posted: Saturday, January 29, 2005
Reply By: M-PostPosted: Saturday, January 29, 2005
I do kinda find it funny that he uses an arguement that could be used for about 90% of the people who debate online, then labels the left with it. Fact and point all those points happen on both the left and right.

why yes it can be SAID about 90% of everyone, BUT it is not, it is being said about leftwingers.

Wow, you really...did nothing about that argument. Way to not make a point.

M-Post, F&B, and Thatoneguy were right. I'm about as middle of the road as it gets in terms of politics, and everyone uses all these and other stupid detours when they can't figure out how to argue. And, based on this response, you do, too, though yours is disguised as #6, the "Let me restate what I said over and over again until you get tired and go away because I'm irrational" argument.

-A.

Moderateman

on Jan 30, 2005

Reply By: AngloesquePosted: Sunday, January 30, 2005

Wow, you really...did nothing about that argument. Way to not make a point.

sometimes when it is not even worth making a point about i do not.. if thats not clear enough . let me say this about that, I voted for making a point before I voted not too. If it is still not clear to you, let me use one of Ted kennedys more lucid speeches..

friggghhsssss brahsg gish me nuffer drinkie damn zit.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!