America has problems, but America is NOT THE PROBLEM!~
Heres is your chance take it please
Published on January 26, 2005 By Moderateman In Politics
For all the whining crybabies protesting the war and bemoaning the treatment of the poor terrorist here is a great idea.

All you have to do is get a new bill together saying NO MORE FUNDING OF WAR>> THATS all

then sign your names to it, get on television and get together a coalition of the weak and cowardly to have petitions signed.

Its very simple really all you have to do is come out and tell america "we will not have part in the greater war on terror"

But of course then you have to live with all your neighbors knowing who you are.

The politicions knowing there re-election is in risk of failing WILL NOT HAVE THE BALLZ to do this.

If your so sure this war is a bad war, wrong war, wrong time, wrong reasons, step up to the national plate and take your swings, out front in view of everyone.

But since you value your jobs and eating at the public troth YOUR not going to do this, your just going to cry, and whine in the background, take sneak shots at the President.



Comments (Page 2)
5 Pages1 2 3 4  Last
on Jan 27, 2005
You just need to go back to the original post for the name calling. Weak, cowardly, whining crybabies


I calls em as I sees em....weak,cowardly,whiney, also spineless, knock kneed, and dandruff filled brains.


I am backkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk left leaning losers beware!!!!!!!!!!
on Jan 27, 2005
Reply By: sandy2Posted: Thursday, January 27, 2005Umm.. mod, the war against Iraq is NOT a war against terror.


ummmmmmm maybe it was not war on terror when WE STARTED BUT IIT IS NOW!!!
on Jan 27, 2005
I am backkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk left leaning losers beware!!!!!!!!!!


And I thought we were making progress

I don't really support this war but cut all funding? That ain't gonna help anyone. I don't see how more people dieing will help end a war. Well, I do, but I would like a little less bloody alternative.
on Jan 27, 2005
Reply #18 By: NJforever - 1/27/2005 8:42:32 PM
I am backkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk left leaning losers beware!!!!!!!!!!


And I thought we were making progress


you and I are.... no need to fight between the 2 of us....we can agree or disagree or agree to disagree, like big boys and not throw rocks either. k?
on Jan 27, 2005

Reply #18 By: NJforever - 1/27/2005 8:42:32 PM
I am backkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk left leaning losers beware!!!!!!!!!!


And I thought we were making progress

I don't really support this war but cut all funding? That ain't gonna help anyone. I don't see how more people dieing will help end a war. Well, I do, but I would like a little less bloody alternative.


as someone that waded in blood up to my ankles in wartime I too hate war,,, but lets try to remember we were attacked.. k?
on Jan 27, 2005
you and I are.... no need to fight between the 2 of us....we can agree or disagree or agree to disagree, like big boys and not throw rocks either. k?


as someone that waded in blood up to my ankles in wartime I too hate war,,, but lets try to remember we were attacked.. k?


I think we can agree here.
on Jan 27, 2005
and on furthure review I did not name one politician nor name the left either,,, why does anyone assume that i was shooting at the left and left pols? um could it be i hit the nail on the head?
on Jan 27, 2005
and on furthure review I did not name one politician nor name the left either,,, why does anyone assume that i was shooting at the left and left pols? um could it be i hit the nail on the head?


No... but it could be the war protesters are the left.... which we are...
on Jan 27, 2005
ummmmmmm maybe it was not war on terror when WE STARTED BUT IIT IS NOW!!!


brilliant strategy, put our military where the terrorists can get to them in an area ripe for recruitment because we left the people to the looters, the kidnappers and couldn't even get basic utilities to them for weeks.
on Jan 28, 2005
You want us to stop talking about the war and Dubyah. Show me that he has a plan in Iraq to end it.


Prs. Bush has told us when he will bring the troops home. He said he would 1) When the job is done and 2) When the government of Iraq asks him to. That is about as much as he can (or should) tell us, without telling the enemy what they need to do to win the war. You don't win wars by telling the enemy your strategies beforehand.

War is not fought on a day planner, palm pilot, or calendar, it is based on a series of objectives and should only end when either the objectives are met, or either side has been broken down to the point they can no longer continue the fight. If the pentagon or the president did have a timetable in mind, It would be completely assanine to tell the enemy what that might be. All that does is signal to the enemy how much longer they have to push it before we just up and quit.

In war, secrets are lives, quit insisting that our government put our troops in even more danger than they already are, just to satisfy our own shortsightedness.
on Jan 28, 2005
Greggbert: 'If you're against this war, then that must mean you're against all wars.'
Dr. Guy: 'I dont recall anyone saying that.'
Moderateman's initial post: ' All you have to do is get a new bill together saying NO MORE FUNDING OF WAR>> THATS all.'
QED. I think.

Moderateman: 'as someone that waded in blood up to my ankles in wartime I too hate war,,, but lets try to remember we were attacked.. k?'
Er, not by Iraq you weren't.
on Jan 28, 2005
Greggbert: 'If you're against this war, then that must mean you're against all wars.'
Dr. Guy: 'I dont recall anyone saying that.'
Moderateman's initial post: ' All you have to do is get a new bill together saying NO MORE FUNDING OF WAR>> THATS all.'
QED. I think.

Moderateman: 'as someone that waded in blood up to my ankles in wartime I too hate war,,, but lets try to remember we were attacked.. k?'
Er, not by Iraq you weren't.
on Jan 28, 2005
Moderateman: 'as someone that waded in blood up to my ankles in wartime I too hate war,,, but lets try to remember we were attacked.. k?'
Er, not by Iraq you weren't.


Tell that to the US and British pilots patroling the "No Fly Zones", which Iraq agreed to respect as part of the Safwan Accords (the ceasefire agreement between the Coalition and Iraq). Also the many infractions of the ceasefire agreement by Iraq gave the U.S. more than enough legal justification for a return to hostilities with the Hussein Regime.

So, yes, Iraq did attack the US (unless you consider an attack on our jets something other than an attack against the U.S.)
on Jan 28, 2005

You want us to stop talking about the war and Dubyah. Show me that he has a plan in Iraq to end it. He hasn't up to now, just wishful thinking. He thought he could come into Iraq with insufficient troops because they would not have to act as police in the post war. They thought everyone would forget they have no food, power as long as they had freedom and gotten rid of Saddam. Another way to get us to stop talking about the war is to find one reason originally presented that is even valid anymore. Put up or shut up.

WOW!  I did not know you were such a military expert!  Did you get that at West Point or Annapolis?  Geez must be hard getting pull over shirts on.  Why dont you send your advice to Rumsfeld!  He could use someone that knows everything.

on Jan 28, 2005

And clearly from the beginning of this grammar error ridden rant there was name calling.

You fail to grasp the difference between calling an action stupid, and calling people stupid.  He did not call you or me any names, just the actions of some.

5 Pages1 2 3 4  Last