Just an FYI interesting update on this story. Cpl. Matt Sanchez turns out to be a.k.a. gay-porn star and 'male escort' Rod Majors:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/max-blumenthal/cpacs-gay-porn-star-hono_b_42842.html

Just an FYI interesting update on this story. Cpl. Matt Sanchez turns out to be a.k.a. gay-porn star and 'male escort' Rod Majors: Link_b_42842.html

And just what does this have to do with the thread? Butthead!

The thread is about Cpl Matt Sanchez. My post is about Cpl Matt Sanchez.

Is that so hard to understand?


You may not find it relevant, but I find it extremely relevant, ironic, and funny. You'd prefer not to know, as ignorance is easier than reality, but that is just typical of right-wing authoritarian personalities, so I don't hold it against you.

So you think they spit on him because he was a gay porn star instead of a Military man?

Ok, how many gay porn stars have been spat upon? How many military men? Do all gays kill babies? Or is that just your stereotype?

Dr Guy, you obtuseness never ceases to amaze.

There is no stereotyping here, not by me. I reported a fact. About one guy. Again, this is a real person and he really was a gay porn star. Not that there's anything wrong with that. I make no generalizations...other than a bit of disdain for conservatives.

Whether he was actually spit upon or called names, and why that may have happened I obviously have made no statement on, opinion or fact. The irony and relevant hypocrisy is in the championing by the Right of a person who, if they had known his history, they would normally have demonized. That the very same people so angry at this name-calling, they are the ones most guilty of vicious name-calling when it comes to gays.



A hint, if you have to start all your replies with "So you think..." then you are most likely in your own fantasy land. Don't tell me what I think, and don't make asinine assumptions about my opinions from the facts I relay.

You reported a non-sequitar. My questions remain. Why are you homophobic? Are you homophobic? Does the persuasion of the individual play a part into what happened to him? If not, then your post was off topic and stupid. If it does, why does it?

I may be obtuse, but your phobia is showing through. Just for the record, are you a liberal? After all, why would you be trying to discredit the victim of a very dastardly act. I guess I just dont get why his sexual persuasion has anything to do with being spat upon and called such ugly names unless that is the reason for it.

Now who is obtuse?



Here's a hint for you. If you lie down with dogs, expect to get up with fleas. Questions are just that. You take them to be accusations, which indicates a guilty conscious. You read more into it than was there, but then the fact you posted it indicates a lot more there than you are willing to admit. Best to inspect your own prejudices before finding ones in innocent questions.

The thread is about Cpl Matt Sanchez. My post is about Cpl Matt Sanchez. Is that so hard to understand?

No it's not hard to understand. What "is" hard to understand is just what him being a gay-porn star has to do with him being called a baby-killer and being spit on? Most especially since your link leads to a blog site. Surely you're not using that as a verifiable source?

Why are you a moron? Did your Mom drop you as a baby, or were you just undernourished? Have you stopped beating your wife? Do kids run from you as you walk down the street because they don't want to be molested again, or do you just frighten them in general? So you think kicking puppies is OK?

Not accusations. Just questions. And as reasonable questions following from your statements as your questions were to mine.

I see. So you are a homophobe, and are ashamed of it. Good that you are ashamed. But it would be better if you were ashamed that you cannot rationally discuss or debate topics without resulting to name calling. Which indicates a decided lack of intelligence.

When you start name calling, you have as much stated "I am wrong". But then the rest of us knew that when you first posted your homophobia.

When you start name calling, you have as much stated "I am wrong". But then the rest of us knew that when you first posted your homophobia.

Gotta point there doc! I've been guilty of that in the past. Now I just do it to the col.

Ah, that is like shooting fish in a barrell!

Even though you both are massive tools (yes, I'll name call--but you should at least have the self-reflection to see that it is you who began the name calling along with your preposterous accusations), even though the two of you working together could not think the way out of a paper sack with a breadcrumb trail...I still find it a bit sad that you can't just enjoy the sheer hilarity, the serendipitous beauty of this story.

It really is a shame that your hate for liberals could prevent you from enjoying this near miracle of convergence. Real world comedy and mild tragedy doesn't get better than this. Anne Coulter and Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly all chumming it up with this guy while simultaneously being the most outspoken homophobes in the media today. It is freaking hilarious and you guys just can't get it. Damn shame.

First, anyone except a mind numbed robot (hence your name I guess) can see that no one was calling names until you did. Second, we are not working in concert, but then psychopaths might think so. I am not he, he is not me. We live in different states and only interact here. Finally, your responses have been on the order of "Yea? So's yours!" and "Your mama too!". To which I stopped responding on that level when I was 8 years old. Perhaps you have yet to reach that age?

In any event, your arguments are very lame, and your homophobia very blatant. And for that I only wish you will mature in the future. If indeed you are 8 years old, and not an adult that cant mature.

Why are you a moron? Did your Mom drop you as a baby, or were you just undernourished? Have you stopped beating your wife? Do kids run from you as you walk down the street because they don't want to be molested again, or do you just frighten them in general? So you think kicking puppies is OK? Not accusations. Just questions. And as reasonable questions following from your statements as your questions were to mine.

"Who" began the name calling? The above quote is "yours", not mine. By that very fact of you calling names means that you had lost the battle "before" you even started. It's widely know that name calling is a certain sign of defeat. It usually means that you have no point left to argue.

I ask you to point out where I called you "any" names! You can't, can you? And since you can't, why don't you just go away.

Even though you both are massive tools (yes, I'll name call--but you should at least have the self-reflection to see that it is you who began the name calling along with your preposterous accusations), even though the two of you working together could not think the way out of a paper sack with a breadcrumb trail...I still find it a bit sad that you can't just enjoy the sheer hilarity, the serendipitous beauty of this story.

According to your post, with link to a lengthy article, President A. Lincoln is quoted as stating something which he did in fact not say in any historical text. That for me, brings into question the rest of the evidence in the propaganda piece which your link clearly is.

http://www.factcheck.org/article415.html