Democrats Ready to Welcome Lieberman back

JOE will get the last laugh

Published on October 30, 2006 By Moderateman In Democrat

After turning their backs on Joe Lieberman and selling him out because he is a free thinker and would not toe the party line, the polls show he is going to kill Ned Lamont.

Now the backstabbing Democrats are already starting to suck up to Joe.

Joe never deserved the treatment he received at the hands of the stinking Democrats, 36 years of faithful service to the Democrats and his reward was, sell him out because he did NOT agree with the lunatics of the left a whole 10% of the time.

While Joe remains faithful to the democrats and will be counted as a "sure vote" for them, the Democrats do NOT DESERVE JOE.

Joe IS ONE OF three Democrats I respect, but I would love to see him sworn in as an Independent and then declare he is switching parties and become a Republican, the republicans can use a sound thinker like Joe, someone with integrity and ethics that no one can deny.

Joe Lieberman is too good a man to stay with the Democrats, they do not deserve him!

Comments (Page 2)

Moderateman

on Oct 30, 2006

Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Monday, October 30, 2006
Anyone who thinks the big issue in this election is Iraq really isn't fit to vote. Congress at this point can't really do anything about Iraq; they don't have the constitutional mandate. The Dems have stated openly that they don't intend to do anything substantial to effect change in Iraq.

I would hope to think that people will vote about their own regional issues.

Moderateman

on Oct 30, 2006

Reply By: Mike's Daily LogPosted: Monday, October 30, 2006
They'll have the ability to cut off funding for the war

VETO... nuff said

Mikes Daily Log

on Oct 30, 2006

VETO... nuff said

You can't veto something that hasn't been approved.

Anyone who thinks the big issue in this election is Iraq really isn't fit to vote.

Anyone who doesn't think Iraq is a big issue is not only not fit to vote; they're not fit to live in the United States. The Iraq war is part of the "war on terror." Our security depends to a great extent on our success in Iraq. If it falls to the insurgents, there's a good chance they'll side with Iran and we'll have made the situation worse by going in there. All the lives and money will have been spent in vain.

Moderateman

on Oct 30, 2006

Reply #18
VETO... nuff said

You can't veto something that hasn't been approved.

ok, then if they try to pull funding for the war they can kiss 2008 goodbye.

bakerstreet

on Oct 30, 2006

Mike's been brainwashed. They can't cut funding for "the troops", it would be political suicide. It's going to be so, so wonderful to see all these starry eyed Dems watch their hopefuls do NOTHING.

Dr Guy

on Oct 30, 2006

Mike's been brainwashed. They can't cut funding for "the troops", it would be political suicide. It's going to be so, so wonderful to see all these starry eyed Dems watch their hopefuls do NOTHING.

I dont think Mike is advocating that, just suggesting it as a democrat option. And you are right. Let them try. It will be the last time they win an election.

bakerstreet

on Oct 30, 2006

No, doc, I'm just tired of the whole shtick. The world will not end if Iraq falls into chaos. In reality the world will still be a better place without Hussein leading Iraq in a consolidated, targeted fashion.

The idea that this was some glorious planned action to bring Democracy to the middle east is a farce. Anyone at this point who looks at the historical record of the last few years and reads the opinions and interviews of the people who were in the administration and in Iraq at the time can see that. We had no grand plan for a secure Iraq whatsoever.

That wasn't the point anyway. The point was a world without Hussein in it. Iraq cannot become the next Iran, because it doesn't have the kind of solidarity the Iranian people have. There would be untold horrors within Iraq as the Shia and the Kurds liquidated the Sunni baathists, but the situation for us and Kuwait and the rest of the world would still be far improved.

We just have to stop believing our own propaganda. We went to unseat Hussein, and we did. Now, if it works out for them, fine. If they are dead set on having a civil war, let them. Where would we be if France or someone had prevented OUR civil war...

Sean Conners aka SConn1

on Oct 30, 2006

After turning their backs on Joe Lieberman and selling him out because he is a free thinker and would not toe the party line

many democratic people supported lieberman in the primary. they included bill clinton and harold ford.

when the primary was over, and lamont won, was the democratic party supposed to support him then over their own candidate? if they supported lieberman at that point, ya'll would have been crying that the democrats have no party unity or loyalty.

the people of conneticut didn't want joe lieberman as their democratic candidate. your issue is with them, not the national party.

the republicans however, have not supported their candidate at all. they spent nothing on schlessinger up there.

butif ya think joe is gonna flip republican, you are fooling yourself.

wish he would start his own party. I think they would garner a lot of the support in the middle. It will be good to see him back in the senate next year, regardless of his party affiliation.

remember guy, i made the call a while back that a centrist 3rd party could be on the horizon...it's a longshot, but i for one would like to see the shake-up. it would be good for our republic, and democracy as a whole imho.

Sean Conners aka SConn1

on Oct 30, 2006

No, doc, I'm just tired of the whole shtick. The world will not end if Iraq falls into chaos.

we agree here too baker. wow,,,anyone spot 4 horsemen anywhere?

the same lines were doled out during vietnam. and none of it happened. in fact asia has moved more towards western capatalism than any other region in the world in the last 30 years. and where they are still not democratic by any means, they are slowly but surely moving there.

i'm not a big dick nixon fan, but his opening the door to china was one of the best things for america both economically and security wise.

Moderateman

on Oct 30, 2006

Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Monday, October 30, 2006
Mike's been brainwashed. They can't cut funding for "the troops", it would be political suicide. It's going to be so, so wonderful to see all these starry eyed Dems watch their hopefuls do NOTHING.

see above your original post, I said the same exact thing....gmta!

Moderateman

on Oct 30, 2006

quote]Reply By: Sean Conners, a.k.a. SConn1Posted: Monday, October 30, 2006

butif ya think joe is gonna flip republican, you are fooling yourself.

It's just a wish, Joe been an outstanding Democrat for 366 years.

the people of conneticut didn't want joe lieberman as their democratic candidate. your issue is with them, not the national party. [

not "the people of conn." the leftwing anti-war DEMOCRATS did not want joe. He will have the last laugh though. The 'PEOPLE" OF CONN ARE GOING TO RE-ELECT HIM.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!