without a word about the two murderers I put here

what murderers? i know of no charges filed even.

slandering people with your biased opinions hardly makes them guilty...but you only wanted to slander. your charges really don't require any response as they are unfounded and without evidence.


the difference between what i posted and what you posted was that you are slandering people who have never been convicted, let alone indicted or anything. most of the people i cited were not only suspected, but convicted. huge difference. in your post, no one has even been able to prove a crime was even committed. in my post, a crime happened and convictions followed.


keep slandering out of desperation if you must tho...have fun:)

(Citizen)Sean Conners, a.k.a. SConn1October 16, 2006 16:49:55

I can give condit a by, but please, the whole world knowsd ted drunken kennedy got away with murder.

and since you put it that way, in many of your people from the right that you cite.... no charges were pressed either!!!!!

Just keep your head in the sand and when you grow up and finally become a success you too will switch and become a republican.

Just keep your head in the sand and when you grow up and finally become a success you too will switch and become a republican.

LMFAO!!!

i was a republican when i held office almost 2 decades ago...when i was young and naive

and i think my life has been pretty successful....11 years of marriage, 2 kids, 1 on the way, and an income which allows me to own a home, drive a lexus and put some money away. several years ago i got to a point where i could take my parents on vacation to pay em back for all the great trips they took me on growing up. i've gotten to a point where i can be generous with causes i deem worthy, so i can give back to this land that has given me opportunity..lots of love and i don't "want" for anything...i'd call that a success...am i wrong,,,do you have a different definition?

just admit that neither of these 2 were convicted of anything and your post is a slander against people who were never even charged with anything instead of being a lame lil dolt trying to play "gotcha games" with me.

what murderers? i know of no charges filed even.

Then "you" don't read much do you? Charges were most definetly filed for both Bobby's AND JFK's murder. See MM's #3 reply. Because "that" is what he was talking about. Maybe ths time "you" are the dead wrong puppy! Try reading a little slower this time.

And if you're refering to Ted...no, no charges were filed. But an awful lot of "hinky" shit was covered up and "that" is a fact. Stuff that he "should" have been charged with suddenly disappeared.

[





BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

i was referring to ted,,,as that is what this post is all about. damn you are seein red...lol

btw,,,so was fraudman,,,let's review....

he posts...

you respond with a list of republicans doing more wrong without a word about the two murderers I put here, what is more wrong a single murder or a whole bunch of crappy behavior?

the "2 murderers in his mind are ted kennedy and gary condit..go back and read the orig post and see where you see jfk et al...

i respond...quote]what murderers? i know of no charges filed even.

you chime in talkin bout JFK and the rest of your nonsense...

Then "you" don't read much do you? Charges were most definetly filed for both Bobby's AND JFK's murder. See MM's #3 reply. Because "that" is what he was talking about. Maybe ths time "you" are the dead wrong puppy! Try reading a little slower this time.

and as anyone can plainly see,,,i am correct, and maybe you need to slow down your reading and stop seein red. hating me doesn't change the facts. and on the facts you are 100% wrong.

now let's see if you are man enough to admit it.

you and fraudman are really making asses out of yourselves trying to "get me" some way, some how....

sorry quack...game over...please play again!

(Citizen)Sean Conners, a.k.a. SConn1October 17, 2006 12:40:13

sorry quack...game over...please play again!

quack? rolf! what other manly terms can you come up with? BOY?

quack? rolf! what other manly terms can you come up with? BOY?


plenty...but the only thing i notice that actually matters above is your inability to admit how wrong you were there....try being a man for a change dr nonsense.

or do you prefer just continuing to dig your hole...maybe it will end up in china!

(Citizen)Sean Conners, a.k.a. SConn1October 17, 2006 13:03:31

quack? rolf! what other manly terms can you come up with? BOY? plenty...but the only thing i notice that actually matters above is your inability to admit how wrong you were there....try being a man for a change dr nonsense. or do you prefer just continuing to dig your hole...maybe it will end up in china!

I have freely admitted to being wrong more than once here. I have no problem with it. But I am not wrong.

i'm sorry,,,where was i in error here?

let's review (again)...

you called ted a "murderer" on several occasions.

you asked the question,,,is ted a murderer?

i said i didn't know, but what i do know is that no charges were even filed. many on the right expressed similair sentiments. they didn't know either.

you reverse your position (flip flop!) and claim you don't know either.

you then attack me even tho i have the same position as the one you flip flopped to.

i attack back with facts...which causes your meltdown and grasping at straws to "get me " at something...anything...

you personally insult me,,then my mother.

you then backpedal off of that in your second "i know you are , but what am i" stance.

you continuously call me and others "left wing loonies" and so forth, even tho i have shown in many ways i am not.

bottom line...you are so far beyond wrong here, that you'd need to catch a bus to get back to wrong.

(Citizen)Sean Conners, a.k.a. SConn1October 17, 2006 13:54:40

ok been fun, I have had enough of tormenting you, behave now or by by Ok?

BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! i was referring to ted,,,as that is what this post is all about. damn you are seeing red...lol btw,,,so was fraudman,,,let's review.... he posts...you respond with a list of republicans doing more wrong without a word about the two murderers I put here, what is more wrong a single murder or a whole bunch of crappy behavior? the "2 murderers in his mind are ted kennedy and gary condit..go back and read the orig post and see where you see jfk et al... i respond...quote]what murderers? i know of no charges filed even. you chime in talking bout JFK and the rest of your nonsense...

I LOVE how you only use "part" of MM's reply. Care to try again, "Bozo"?
I think I have just "proven" what I said, and you showed that you're an a**hole!

#3 by Moderateman Sat, October 14, 2006 2:41 PM LocamamaOctober 14, 2006 14:27:00 The Kennedy thing I really don't know about. It was before my time. I do not defend him but for some reason the people of Massachusetts keep electing him. Drunken ted keeps getting elected for the same two reasons he got away with murder. His Brothers that were killed, JFK while President of the United states and RFK while campaigning for the Presidency. They murdered the two good ones and let the scum sucker Ted live.

Now, does the above answer satisfy your question? Or should I write it in crayon? See no matter "what" you think of me (not that I really care) I usually back up what I'm saying with evidence. Now whether or not the evidence is to your liking....bothers me not one whit!