Bill Clinton, He is the one responsible for September 11th.

NO matter how you twist so called "facts"

Published on September 27, 2006 By Moderateman In War on Terror

The first twin tower attack 1993, Bill Clinton was President. Action taken? nothing.

Blowing up our embassy in Kenya 1998, Bill Clinton was President. Action taken? Nothing.

Blowing up our Embassy in Tanzania 1998, Bill Clinton was President. Action taken? Nothing.

Blowing up a United States warship the U.S.S. COLE, the year 2000, month Oct. Bill Clinton was President. Action taken? He blew up a pharmaceutical warehouse with a cruise missile. Other action 6taken? Nothing.

The Kobart towers, Bill Clinton was President. ACTION TAKEN? Nothing.

The slaughter of American troops, The October 3, 1993 US raid on Somalia, in which 18 soldiers and two Black Hawk helicopters were lost, is often remembered as a tragic fiasco. Bill Clinton was President, Action taken? Tuck his tail between his legs and ran away. That's the famous Democrat war-cry. "quick run away and hide"

All the attacks on America, all leading to Sept 11th 2001, the complete and utter lack of any action by President Clinton did nothing but EMBOLDEN TERRORISTS. The thought and rightly so, America was a paper tiger, no guts for war. This lack of action has been cited by Usama Bin Laden as one of the biggest reasons for the Sept. 11th attack on America.

No matter what facts you Democrats try to come up with, the cold hard truth is Clinton FAILED AMERICA, CLINTON FAILED 3000 PEOPLE IN THE TWIN TOWER ATTACKS. If he would have killed Bin Laden like he should have, and lord knows he had at least somewhere between 3 and 12 opportunities to do so, again he did nothing.

Comments (Page 3)

eieio

on Oct 01, 2006

Hmm ... all these quotes are about what intelligence sources said.

Meaning the CIA.

Honest asumptions, deliberate misinformation or defiance of the last two presidents?.. still makes you wonder who has been calling the shots at the CIA for the last 10 -15 years

drmiler

on Oct 01, 2006

I really recommend you check that final link out (this one: Link) as it is not a diatribe or poorly designed lunatics site. It is a well documented exploration of the statements President Bush made during that speech.

Lets look at this in a more realistic way. First off this was written "3 years" ago. Much intel has been found and verified since then. Then there's this:

In this column, I will examine the publicly available evidence relating to this and other statements in the State of the Union concerning Saddam's WMDs. Obviously, I do not have access to the classified information the President doubtless relied upon. But much of the relevant information he drew from appears to have been declassified, and made available for inquiring minds.

In which he very plainly admits to "NOT" having access to all the classified intel that the President does. So since he doesn't have access we can assume that the conclusions he has drawn are "NOT" based on all the facts. And having made these conclusions in this manner one could also (and rightly so) assume that his conclusions are merely his opinion. So if you want to believe what this guy says is fact.....go right ahead! But do not expect all of the rest of us to swallow this bilge without complaint.

Moderateman

on Oct 01, 2006

But, this is obviously pointless. Faced with the brutal facts above, Moderateman could only resort to sitting in the corner, holding his knees, rocking back and forth chanting "everything I said is true, everything I said is true". Deny away, dude, deny away.

oh please do not imagine I have not seen enough of the world to understand that shit happens with every president. BTW I voted for bill twice, was a democrat in those days, stayed a democrat till 2003 when I saw the GARBAGE the democratic party put out for president.

I wrote this article to show how easy it would be to blame bill for all the evils of todays world. just like some like to point out that if a man farts at a party offending a sheik from Qutar it's somehow all Bushes fault.

how ya like them apples?

btw I noticed you put all your apples in one small part of my article, and ignored the rest that does not support your flimsy excuses.

Reply By: rabidrobotPosted: Saturday, September 30, 2003

I am not claiming non-U.S. citizens have, or even should have, all the rights granted to actual U.S. citizens by the U.S. Constitution. And it would take a real leap to read that into anything I have said thus far. But, one might do well to recall the words of our Founding Fathers, who said in the Declaration of Independance:

"We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their creator, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness."

yes while granting blackmen and black women the honor of being 5/8th a human being.

Moderateman

on Oct 01, 2006

Reply By: rabidrobotPosted: Saturday, September 30, 2006
Moderateman:
Bill had nothing to do with the arrest and trials of said terrorist asholes.

So, by your logic, George had nothing to do with the capture of Saddam. That's an interesting viewpoint, for sure. Perhaps you can defend it a bit more.

the difference is Bush as commander in chief gets credit for any and all military actions, the bad and the good.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!